| 1 |
Welcome |
Martha S. Heney, Webmaster
WorldWideWallach.com |
| 2 |
Allergies |
Doc Ed, The Longevity Institute |
| 3 |
Allergies2
|
Doc Ed, The Longevity Institute |
| 4 |
Allergies3
|
Kingmaker |
| 5 |
Allergies4
|
Martha S Heney, Kingmaker |
| 6 |
Arthritis/Joint/Muscle/Pain
Relief/General Health |
Brenda Patrick, Registered Nurse |
| 7 |
Deafness |
Dr. Joel Wallach, Dead Doctors Don't
Lie |
| 8 |
Re: Deafness - Folic Acid
may prevent deafness |
Youngevity |
| 9 |
Tips on Taking Products -
Osteo FX |
Brenda Patrick, RN |
| 10 |
WATER OR COKE? |
an English friend |
| 11 |
Tea 'healthier' drink
than water |
BBC Health |
| 12 |
Margarine or Butter? |
a friend in England |
| 13 |
OMEGA 3 Long chain
fatty acids - EPA/DHA,
LIST OF THINGS IMPROVED |
Dr. Linus Pauling & Doc Ed |
| 14 |
OMEGA 3 Long chain - EPA/DHA
and BONE HEALTH |
American Longevity |
| 15 |
OMEGA 3 - EPA/DHA
and HEART health |
American Longevity |
| 16 |
Re: OMEGA 3 Long chain - EPA/DHA
and HEART health |
United Kingdom |
| 17 |
OMEGA 3 Long chain - EPA/DHA
and ALLERGIES |
Kingmaker |
| 18 |
ADD/ADHD and OMEGA 3
- EPA/DHA |
Robert Loney |
| 19 |
OMEGA 3 - EPA/DHA and
EYES |
Steve - Youngevity |
| 20 |
OMEGA 3 Long chain fatty acids - EPA/DHA
-Europe knows! |
NY Times |
| 21 |
OMEGA 3 - EPA/DHA and
INFLAMMATION |
Steve - Youngevity |
| 22 |
Green Tea Could
Provide Alzheimer's Breakthrough |
American Longevity |
| 23 |
New Study Reaffirms Possible Brain
Benefits from Curcumin (Turmeric) |
UCLA |
| 24 |
Lung/emphysema & the
miracle of tomato juice! |
American Longevity |
| 25 |
Antibiotic abuse -
Acidolphilus friendly bacteria |
unknown |
| 26 |
Prescription Drug Abuse |
UK - BBC |
| 27 |
Bird Flu |
Chrissie - UK |
| 28 |
Infectious disease and
pneumonia prevention and treatment with essential oils and
aromatic medicine. |
Marilyn |
| 29 |
Recognizing a STROKE |
Chrissie - UK |
| 30 |
Too Little Salt Could Be
Bad For You, Claims New Study. |
Steve, American Longevity |
| 31 |
Calcium comparison |
unknown |
| 32 |
Knee problems could
be low Selenium. |
American Longevity |
| 33 |
Knee arthritis |
Steve Wallach |
| 34 |
Vertigo/dizziness |
Andrew |
| 35 |
LISTEN to your body!
- true wisdom |
Martha |
| 36 |
Recalled over-the-counter DANGEROUS
medications |
FDA via a friend |
| 37 |
Colon health thru
Omega3 and Anti-oxidants |
Steve - Youngevity |
| 38 |
Pneumonia 'needs less treatment' - shorter
term antibiotics |
BBC |
| 39 |
Colon Inflammation |
Martha |
| 40 |
Texas forces all
adolescent girls to have vaccination for cervical cancer virus! |
Dr. Robert J. Rowan, MD |
| 41 |
CIRCULATION |
BBC HEALTH |
| 42 |
Hopes for Alzheimer's
treatment |
Cardiff University |
| 43 |
Pillows can harbour
harmful fungi |
BBC News |
| 44 |
Pharmaceutical Truth,
the greed we endure |
Dept. of Commerce |
| 45 |
CURRY CURES ARTHRITIS |
BBC |
| 46 |
MRI/Catscan may cause
cancer |
BBC Health |
| 47 |
Alzheimer mice memories
restored |
BBC Health |
| 48 |
Eye problems could be
caused by certain herbs and supplements |
Medical Net |
| 49 |
Rosacea cure |
Dr. Robert J. Rowan, MD |
| 50 |
The best way to remove deadly
chemicals from your body |
Dr. Robert J. Rowan, MD |
| 51 |
Cocoa Polyphenols Support Healthy
Blood Sugar Levels According to New Study |
Steve Wallach |
| 52 |
Beef diet 'damages
sons' sperm' |
BBC News |
| 53 |
Heavy mobile use
'damages sperm' |
BBC News |
| 54 |
Low-fat dairy
infertility warning |
BBC News |
| 55 |
Overly Anxious And Driven People
Prone To Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
British Medical Journal |
| 56 |
The Dangers of Meat |
PBS |
| 57 |
Too much of
this healthy fat increases your risk of cancer |
Dr. Robert J. Rowan, MD |
| 58 |
Fat hormone 'boosts colon
cancer' |
BBC News |
| 59 |
SWEET BUT POISON--Aspartame--stop
using it! |
Josephine |
| 60 |
The Mass Poisoning
of Humanity
An Exploration Of Human Stupidity |
By Mike Adams
NewsTarget.com |
| 61 |
MSG - Slowly Poisoning America |
Author Unknown |
| 62 |
Hidden Sources Of MSG
In Foods |
By Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD |
| 63 |
Better Omega 3 To Omega 6
Ratio Could Reduce Depression And Boost Mood |
Steve Wallach, CEO
Youngevity |
| 64 |
Selenium pills 'may
combat HIV' |
BBC |
| 65 |
Med diet 'cuts lung
disease risk' |
BBC |
| 66 |
Mammograms
cause breast cancer (and other cancer facts you
probably never knew) |
NEWSTARGET |
| 67 |
Aspirin 'prevents bowel
cancer' |
BBC |
| 68 |
Hot water kills dust mites |
Yahoo Health |
| 69 |
Court Begins Hearings on Vaccine
Link to Autism |
Fox News |
| 70 |
CANCER
UPDATE FROM JOHN HOPKINS HOSPITAL |
Johns Hopkins |
| 71 |
Caution: Some soft
drinks may seriously harm your health
Expert links additive to cell damage |
BBC |
| 72 |
Report: Soda May Seriously Harm Your
Health |
BBC |
| 73 |
Feeling lethargic, moody, tired, fat? It could be
your thyroid |
Health.com |
| 74 |
Other Ways to Beat Eczema |
Dr. Robert J. Rowan, MD |
| 75 |
Low cholesterol 'link'
to cancer |
BBC |
| 76 |
"Dr." Barrett of Quackwatch/Quackbuster
leaves town |
Steve Wallach |
| 77 |
New research on PARASITES:
SLEEPING SICKNESS and CHAGAS'
DISEASE |
BBC Health |
| 78 |
Black Walnut Herb Anti-fungal Parasite
Cleanse |
Dr. Hulda Clark |
| 79 |
Metabolic syndrome |
Dr Trisha Macnair |
| 80 |
High Fructose Corn Syrup Used in Soda
Linked to Diabetes |
American Chemical Society |
| 81 |
Morgellons Disease - new epidemic |
Morgellons Society |
| 82 |
Hormone linked to autistic traits |
BBC News |
| 83 |
Autism symptoms
reversed in lab |
BBC Health |
| 84 |
Does vitamin C cure cancer or not?
Here's the final answer... |
Robert Jay Rowen, MD |
| 85 |
How to double niacin's ability to treat high
cholesterol |
Robert Jay Rowen, MD |

| 1 |
Welcome everyone! Please post any information that
you think will help someone else, based on your own experiences.
They should only deal with useage of nutrition and nutritional supplements.
You
never know, your words might save another very important life or
ease another's suffering!
And there is no better service you could
provide to the whole human race than that. God bless you.

|
| 2 |
To correct the excessive omega-6 to omega-3 ratio in
the diet, we should avoid omega-6 EFAs rich fats and oils and
supplement the diet with omega-3 EFAs rich fats and oils.
Omega-3 EFAs are available in flax seeds, in cold ocean fish
(sardine, salmon, mackerel, and herring), and in fish oil
supplements.
Here we have to make a distinction between Alpha
Linolenic Acid (ALA), Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA.
ALA is a short chain omega-3 EFA found
in flax seed, and in flax seed oil. EPA and DHA are long chain
omega-3 EFAs.
ALA has little biochemical function except to
contribute to cell membrane fluidity, and to be the raw material
to make EPA and DHA.
The conversion of ALA into EPA and DHA is a slow process. In
best conditions 5 to 7 percent of the ingested ALA is converted
into longer chain omega-3 EFAs only.
People that can not
convert enough ALA need food and supplements containing EPA and
DHA.

|
| 3 |
TO RESTORE OUR HEALTH: "the long and the short
of it is that the only real way to restore our health is to
increase our consumption of food and/or supplements that already
contain
the omega-3 long chain essential fatty acids EPA and DHA.

|
| 4 |
PEANUTS vs. SHRIMP: It is worth mentioning that an
allergic reaction to shrimp is always much less severe than the
allergic reaction to peanuts. The reason for this difference is
very simple.
Aside from the allergens it comes with, peanuts
contain omega-6 EFAs exclusively, the EFAs that boost immmune
reaction, while shrimp are rich in long chain omega-3 EFAs that
are, as we have seen,
the brakes fo the immune system. (Doc Ed,
The Longevity Institute)

|
| 5 |
EFA – Essential Fatty Acids - ALLERGY the way
Kingmaker understands it, simplified…. (no guarantees)… just
the struggle on a complex issue.
More needs to be said about EFAs and allergies. I can't buy
normal EFAs even though I sell them through American Longevity. I
need to find out first if a person is an allergy type before I let
them buy EFA from me. I would suggest a different EFA (from NSI)
if they are allergic types, since EFA is necessary to make all the
other minerals work the best they can, so they do need them.
Omega 3 is the only one wanted by ‘allergy types’. Omega 6
incites immune response, often causing allergy because of
over-response, while 3s suppress it. Omega 6s come from food all
over America, like French Fries, vegetable oil and salad dressing,
but 3s don't come in at all. Even all 3s aren't good for allergy
types. Flax Seed Oil, which is a 3, was not the best for me, being
only a short-chain building block which my body was unable to use
to build long chain since I have a damaged immune system, like all
allergy sufferers.
With any autoimmune disease, Flax Seed Oil is not good enough
in spite of it being an Omega 3, which we need so much. EPA and
DHA, (the 'long-chain best of all EFA ("end-results")')
that we do need can only be found in cold water oily fish, namely
salmon, anchovy, sardine, herring and mackerel. I wonder how much
of that is in the American diet? I must laugh. Very little, as Doc
Ed says. We must supplement. We simply must. And mine has to be
specific Omega 3-EPA/DHA only. Not the typical product on the
market, Omega 3-6-9. This, I have discovered, is important,
although so few know it. But research it for yourself, please!
Some of my allergy is already cured, I believe, but I
understand that it may take up to 2 years before I will be totally
allergy free. Still, what a wonderful piece of knowledge. And I
can now eat shrimp! Thank you, Doc Ed. Kingmaker recommends NSI
Mega EFA Omega-3EPA & DHA ($13.99) to solve allergy problems.
Just click on the link below to purchase.
NSI
Mega EFA Omega-3 EPA & DHA - 120 Softgels

|
| 6 |
"PIGGY'S PRESS RELEASE"
**** The Royal Pig Pak ******
Piggy's Perfect Pig Pak
Piggy's PainFree Pig Pak - Priceless Pain Relief
and.... The Complete Answer to Health for All !!!!!
Contains:
1 quart Ultimate Tangy Tangerine (a 1 month supply)
1 quart Majestic Earth Osteo-fx (a 1 month supply)
1 quart Majestic Earth Liquid Gluco-Gel
1 ultimate EFA 60 Softgels
Estimated time to normal health is 90 days...may vary case by
case.

|
| 7 |
DEAFNESS: In a tin deficiency, the early symptoms
are male pattern baldness. (I see a lot of tin deficiency in this
room), and if you let it go on for any length of time, you get
deafness. (Dead Doctors Don't Lie)

|
| 8 |
Folic Acid May Prevent Age-Related Hearing Loss
Folic Acid Supplements may prevent age-related hearing loss in
older men and women, says a new double-blind, randomized,
placebo-controlled trial from the Netherlands. The Study,
published in the new issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine,
followed 728 men and women between the ages of 50 and 70 who were
randomly assigned to receive either a Folic Acid supplement of 800
micrograms per day or a placebo for three years. Lead Author Jane
Durga and her colleagues from Wageningen University Hospital
Maastrict, reported that the Folic Acid-Supplemented group
exhibited lower age-related hearing loss in the low frequency
region.

|
| 9 |
Tips on taking Osteofx:
Refrigerate product once opened ( taste much better cold).
Shake bottle before each dose.
Carefully/slowly pour 1 level kitchen tablespoon and take directly
off spoon.
How much to take: 1 tablespoon in morning 1 tablespoon in evening
at dinner time or at bedtime.
If you enjoy eating plain yogurt or drinking "Kefir" a
yogurt probiotic beverage, it is delicious to mix 1 tablespoon
osteofx into 1 cup of Kefir/or 1 cup yogurt and eat/drink. It
taste like a pina colada/coconut yogurt shake.
Calcium, when taken at bedtime, relaxes the muscles, and makes
one sleep sounder.
Spacing out the doses twice a day provides a more steady stream of
nutrients in the body, as opposed to taking everything once a day.
A person with a chronic condition or serious pain/insomnia can
even space the doses out every 6-8 hours (3-4 times a day) to
further maximize absorption at a cellular level.
Hope this is helpful.
Sincerely,
Brenda Patrick, RN

|
| 10 |
This is really an eye opener.... Water or Coke? We
all know that water is important but I've never seen it written
down like this before.
WATER
1. 75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated.
2. In 37% of Americans, the thirst mechanism is so weak that it is
often mistaken for hunger.
3. Even MILD dehydration will slow down one's metabolism as much
as 3%.
4. One glass of water will shut down midnight hunger pangs for
almost 100% of the dieters studied in a University of Washington
study.
5. Lack of water, the #1 trigger of daytime fatigue.
6. Preliminary research indicates that 8-10 glasses of water a day
could significantly ease back and joint pain for up to 80% of
sufferers.
7. A mere 2% drop in body water can trigger fuzzy short-term
memory, trouble with basic math, and difficulty focusing on the
computer screen or on a printed page.
8. Drinking 5 glasses of water daily decreases the risk of colon
cancer by 45%, plus it can slash therisk of breast cancer by 79%,
and one is 50% lesslikely to develop bladder cancer. And now for
the properties of
COKE:
1. In many states (in the USA) the highway patrol carries two
gallons of coke in the truck to remove blood from the highway
after a car accident.
2. You can put a T-bone steak in a bowl of coke and it will be
gone in two days.
3. To clean a toilet: Pour a can of Coca-Cola intothe toilet bowl
and let the "real thing" sit for one hour, then flush
clean. The citric acid in Coke removes stains from vitreous China.
4. To remove rust spots from chrome car bumpers: Rub the bumper
with a rumpled-up piece of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil dipped in
Coca-Cola.
5. To clean corrosion from car battery terminals: Pour a can of
Coca-Cola over the terminals to bubble away the corrosion.
6. To loosen a rusted bolt: Applying a cloth soaked in Coca-Cola
to the rusted bolt for several minutes.
7. To bake a moist ham: Empty a can of Coca-Cola into the baking
pan, wrap the ham in aluminum foil, and bake. Thirty minutes
before the ham is finished, remove the foil, allowing the
drippings to mix with the Coke for a sumptuous brown gravy.
8. To remove grease from clothes: Empty a can of coke into a load
of greasy clothes, add detergent, and run through a regular cycle.
The Coca-Cola will help loosen grease stains.
9. It will also clean road haze from your windshield.
For Your Info:
1. The active ingredient in Coke is phosphoric acid. Its pH is
2.8. It will dissolve a nail in about 4days. Phosphoric acid also
leaches calcium from bones and is a major contributor to the
rising increase in osteoporosis.
2. To carry Coca-Cola syrup (the concentrate) the commercial truck
must use the Hazardous material place cards reserved for Highly
corrosive materials.
3. The distributors of coke have been using it to clean the
engines of their trucks for about 20 years!
Now the question is, would you like a coke or a glass of water?
Have A Great Day and Share It With Others!

|
| 11 |
Tea 'healthier' drink than water Drinking three or
more cups of tea a day is as good for you as drinking plenty of
water and may even have extra health benefits, say researchers.
The work in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition dispels the
common belief that tea dehydrates. Tea not only rehydrates as well
as water does, but it can also protect against heart disease and
some cancers, UK nutritionists found. Experts believe flavonoids
are the key ingredient in tea that promote health. Healthy cuppa
These polyphenol antioxidants are found in many foods and plants,
including tea leaves, and have been shown to help prevent cell
damage. Tea replaces fluids and contains antioxidants so its got
two things going for it Lead author Dr Ruxton Public health
nutritionist Dr Carrie Ruxton, and colleagues at Kings College
London, looked at published studies on the health effects of tea
consumption. They found clear evidence that drinking three to four
cups of tea a day can cut the chances of having a heart attack.
Some studies suggested tea consumption protected against cancer,
although this effect was less clear-cut. Other health benefits
seen included protection against tooth plaque and potentially
tooth decay, plus bone strengthening. Dr Ruxton said:
"Drinking tea is actually better for you than drinking water.
Water is essentially replacing fluid. Tea replaces fluids and
contains antioxidants so its got two things going for it."
Rehydrating She said it was an urban myth that tea is dehydrating.
"Studies on caffeine have found very high doses dehydrate and
everyone assumes that caffeine-containing beverages dehydrate. But
even if you had a really, really strong cup of tea or coffee,
which is quite hard to make, you would still have a net gain of
fluid. "Also, a cup of tea contains fluoride, which is good
for the teeth," she added. There was no evidence that tea
consumption was harmful to health. However, research suggests that
tea can impair the body's ability to absorb iron from food,
meaning people at risk of anaemia should avoid drinking tea around
mealtimes. Tea is not dehydrating. It is a healthy drink Claire
Williamson of the British Nutrition Foundation Dr Ruxton's team
found average tea consumption was just under three cups per day.
She said the increasing popularity of soft drinks meant many
people were not drinking as much tea as before. "Tea drinking
is most common in older people, the 40 plus age range. In older
people, tea sometimes made up about 70% of fluid intake so it is a
really important contributor," she said. Claire Williamson of
the British Nutrition Foundation said: "Studies in the
laboratory have shown potential health benefits. "The
evidence in humans is not as strong and more studies need to be
done. But there are definite potential health benefits from the
polyphenols in terms of reducing the risk of diseases such as
heart disease and cancers. "In terms of fluid intake, we
recommend 1.5-2 litres per day and that can include tea. Tea is
not dehydrating. It is a healthy drink." The Tea Council
provided funding for the work. Dr Ruxton stressed that the work
was independent. Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/5281046.stm
Published: 2006/08/24 09:51:47 GMT © BBC MMVI

|
| 12 |
DO YOU KNOW... the difference between margarine and
butter? Read on to the end...it gets very interesting:
1. Both have the same amount of calories.
2. Butter is slightly higher in saturated fats at 8 grams compared
to 5 grams.
3. Eating margarine can increase heart disease in women by 53%
over eating the same amount of butter, according to a recent
Harvard Medical Study.
4. Eating butter increases the absorption of many other nutrients
in other foods.
5. Butter has many nutritional benefits where margarine has a few
only because they are added!
6. Butter tastes much better than margarine and it enhances the
flavors of other foods.
7. Butter has been around for centuries where margarine has been
around for less than 100 years. And now for Margarine :
8. Very high in trans fatty acids... Triple risk of coronary heart
disease.
9. Increases total cholesterol and LDL (this is the bad
cholesterol)
10. Lowers HDL cholesterol, (the good cholesterol)...
11. Increases the risk of cancers by up to fivefold...
12. Lowers quality of breast milk...
13. Decreases immune response...
14. Decreases insulin response.
AND, HERE IS THE PART THAT IS VERY INTERESTING! (the most
disturbing facts....):
1. Margarine is but only ONE MOLECULE away from being PLASTIC .
2. And, margarine is initially BLACK , but it is DYED YELLOW to
look like butter .
These facts alone were enough to have me avoiding margarine for
life and anything else that is hydrogenated (this means hydrogen
is added, changing the molecular structure of the substance). You
can try this yourself: purchase a tub of margarine and leave it in
your garage or shaded area. Within a couple of days you will note
a couple of things: no flies, not even those pesky fruit flies
will go near it (that should tell you something) .. it does not
rot or smell differently because it has no nutritional value,
nothing will grow on it...even those teeny weenie microorganisms
will not find a home to grow.
Why? Because it is nearly plastic. Would you melt your
Tupperware and spread that on your toast? Yuk!

|
| 13 |
List of things improved by EPA/DHA:
1. ALLERGY (to anything)
2. AUTOIMMUNE diseases:
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Immune-Mediated
or Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Systemic
Lupus Erythematosus, Psoriasis, Scleroderma, Thyroid Diseases,
Depression, Attention Deficit, Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD),
Alzheimer Disease
3. BLOOD CLOTTING problems
4. HEART DISEASE - thrombosis, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction
(MI)
5. rheumatoid arthritis
6. Vision development in infants
7. diabetes
8. tender joints and morning stiffness
9. some psychiatric disorders
10. asthma
11. hay fever
12. dry eye syndrome
13. Cancer
14. Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease
15. A nephropathy kidney disorder
16. Major depression and bipolar disorder
17.Schizophrenia
For more detailed information, read the words of Dr. Linus Pauling:
http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/othernuts/omega3fa/index.html
and Doc Ed at the Longevity Institute:
http://www.longevinst.org/nlt/newsletter13ext4.htm

|
| 14 |
Omega -3s "Crucial" To Bone Health in
Later Years.
Getting the right balance of Omega-3s and Omega-6s in the
diet may ward off much of the bone loss seen with post-menopausal
osteoporosis, say US scientists. Much of the research on
omega-3 fatty acids, found in oily fish, has focused on their
benefits for the heart and mental health.
But a recent study adds to mounting evidence of their role in
bone health. "Our lab and others have shown that omega-3
fatty acids help promote bone formation," said Bruce
Watkins, professor and director of Purdue University's Center for
Enhancing Foods to Protect Health.

|
| 15 |
Omega-3s Lower Lipids, Reduce Cardiac Mortality.
Consumption of EFA's (Omega-3 essential fatty acids)
reduces the risk of cardiac mortality in intervention trials
better than statin drugs, according to a research review published
in the Archives of Internal Medicine (165, 7: 725-30,2005).
Researchers at University Hospital in Basel, Switzerland,
reviewed results of randomized controlled trials that compared a
lipid lowering intervention with placebo or usual diet with
respect to mortality. Compared with control groups, the risk
ratios for cardiac mortality decreased 22 percent for statins and
32 percent for Omega-3 fatty acids.

|
| 16 |
The UK Body Backs Health Claim for Omega-3s:
Fish Oil supplements and foods fortified with
marine-sourced omega-3 fats on the UK market have gained the
scientific go-ahead to promote the heart-health benefits of their
products.
The news lends further backing to an Omega-3 health claim in
future regulation, currently under discussion by MEPs. The
US FDA has also approved a health claim for Omega-3 fatty acids in
foods and supplements. The FDA-approved health claim was submitted
by Dr. Joel Wallach and American Longevity and had positive
comments submitted to the FDA by Kraft Foods and the Oregon Health
Sciences Institute.

|
| 17 |
EFA – Essential Fatty Acids - ALLERGY the way
Kingmaker understands it, simplified…. (no guarantees)… just
the struggle on a complex issue.
More needs to be said about EFAs and allergies. I can't buy
normal EFAs even though I sell them through American Longevity. I
need to find out first if a person is an allergy type before I let
them buy EFA from me. I would suggest a different EFA (from NSI)
if they are allergic types, since EFA is necessary to make all the
other minerals work the best they can, so they do need them.
Omega 3 is the only one wanted by ‘allergy types’. Omega 6
incites immune response, often causing allergy because of
over-response, while 3s suppress it. Omega 6s come from food all
over America, like French Fries, vegetable oil and salad dressing,
but 3s don't come in at all. Even all 3s aren't good for allergy
types. Flax Seed Oil, which is a 3, was not the best for me, being
only a short-chain building block which my body was unable to use
to build long chain since I have a damaged immune system, like all
allergy sufferers.
With any autoimmune disease, Flax Seed Oil is not good enough
in spite of it being an Omega 3, which we need so much. EPA and
DHA, (the 'long-chain best of all EFA ("end-results")')
that we do need can only be found in cold water oily fish, namely
salmon, anchovy, sardine, herring and mackerel. I wonder how much
of that is in the American diet? I must laugh. Very little, as Doc
Ed says. We must supplement. We simply must. And mine has to be
specific Omega 3-EPA/DHA only. Not the typical product on the
market, Omega 3-6-9. This, I have discovered, is important,
although so few know it. But research it for yourself, please!
Some of my allergy is already cured, I believe, but I
understand that it may take up to 2 years before I will be totally
allergy free. Still, what a wonderful piece of knowledge. And I
can now eat shrimp! Thank you, Doc Ed. Kingmaker recommends NSI
Mega EFA Omega-3EPA & DHA ($13.99) to solve allergy problems.
Just click on the link below to purchase.
NSI
Mega EFA Omega-3 EPA & DHA - 120 Softgels

|
| 18 |
More support for omega-3 calming
ADHD kids
6/22/2006-
Supplements of omega-3 and omega-6 improved the
attention span and hyperactivity scores of young Australians, and
was rated better than the common medication Ritalin. The study
adds to a growing number of studies looking at the effect of fish
oils on the behaviour and learning of kids, and reports in the UK
suggest the British government may even be considering omega-3 and
omega-6 food supplements in schools.
___________________________________ Full
Article:
http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/news/printNewsBis.asp?id=68599

|
| 19 |
EFAs May Protect Your Eyes Higher intake of Omega-3
essential fatty acids (EFAs) benefits eye health, according to two
studies published in the latest Archives of Ophthalmology. In the
first study, researchers from the University of Sydney reviewed
longitudinal associations between dietary fat and incident
age-related maculopathy (ARM) from participants in the Australian
Blue Mountains Eye Study (1992-1999). A total of 3,654 persons
participated. Persons with the highest vs. lowest quintiles of
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fat intake had a 60 percent lower risk of
incident of early ARM. Consuming fish at least once a week dropped
the risk by 40 percent, while thrice (three times) weekly
consumption netted a 75 percent reduction. The second study used
data from the U.S. Twin Study of Age Related Macular Degeneration
(AMD) to assess the impact of Omega-3 intake, fish consumption and
cigarette smoking on incidence of AMD. Researchers from the
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School,
Boston, reviewed data on 222 twins with AMD and 459 twins with no
AMD or only early signs. Current smokers had almost twice the risk
of AMD while past smokers had a 1.7 fold increased risk. Increased
intake of fish and higher intake of omega-3 EFAs were both
inversely associated with AMD.

|
| 20 |
In Europe It’s Fish Oil After
Heart Attacks, but Not in U.S.
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL Published: October 3, 2006 ROME
—
Every patient in the cardiac care unit at the San Filippo
Neri Hospital who survives a heart attack goes home with a
prescription for purified fish oil, or omega-3 fatty acids.
“It is clearly recommended in international
guidelines,” said Dr. Massimo Santini, the hospital’s chief of
cardiology, who added that it would be considered tantamount to
malpractice in Italy to omit the drug.
In a large number of studies, prescription fish oil has been
shown to improve survival after heart attacks and to reduce fatal
heart rhythms. The American College of Cardiology recently
strengthened its position on the medical benefit of fish oil,
although some critics say that studies have not defined the
magnitude of the effect.
But in the United States, heart attack victims are not
generally given omega-3 fatty acids, even as they are routinely
offered more expensive and invasive treatments, like pills to
lower cholesterol or implantable defibrillators. Prescription fish
oil, sold under the brand name Omacor, is not even approved by the
Food and Drug Administration for use in heart patients.
“Most cardiologists here are not giving omega-3’s
even though the data supports it — there’s a real
disconnect,” said Dr. Terry Jacobson, a preventive cardiologist
at Emory University in Atlanta. “They have been very slow to
incorporate the therapy.”
The fact that heart patients receive such different treatments
in sophisticated hospitals around the world highlights the central
role that drug companies play in disseminating medical
information, experts said.
Because prescription fish oil is not licensed to prevent heart
disease in the United States, drug companies may not legally
promote it for that purpose at conferences, in doctors’ offices,
to patients or even on the Internet.
“If people paid more attention to guidelines, more people
would be on the drug,” Dr. Jacobson said. “But pharmaceutical
companies can’t drive this change. The fact that it’s not
licensed for this has definitely kept doctors away.”
For example, on Solvay Pharmaceutical’s Web site for Omacor,
www.solvay-omacor.com, the first question a user sees is, “Are
you a U.S. citizen?”
If the answer is yes, the user is sent to a page where heart
attacks are not mentioned. (In the United States, Omacor is
licensed only to treat the small number of people with extremely
high blood triglyceride levels.)
So community doctors do not learn how to use the drug. Lack of
F.D.A. approval also means that insurers will not pay for
treatment with Omacor. Approval from the agency for the use of the
drug in heart disease is not expected soon.
A study published last month in The Journal of the American
Board of Family Medicine found that only 17 percent of family
doctors were likely to prescribe fish oil to their patients,
including patients who had suffered a heart attack. There was a
great need, the authors concluded, to “improve awareness of this
important advice.”
The fact that fish oil is also sold as a nutritional supplement
has made it harder for some doctors to regard it as a powerful
drug, experts said.
“Using this medicine is very popular here in Italy, I think
partly because so many cardiologists in this country participated
in the studies and were aware of the results,” said Dr. Maria
Franzosi, a researcher at the Mario Negri Institute in Milan.
“In other countries, uptake may be harder because doctors think
of it as just a dietary intervention.”
In the largest study of fish oil — conducted more than a
decade ago — Italian researchers from the Gissi Group (Gruppo
Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto), gave
11,000 patients one gram of prescription fish oil a day after
heart attacks. After three years, the study found that the number
of deaths was reduced by 20 percent and that the number of sudden
deaths by 40 percent, compared with a control group.
Later studies have continued to yield positive results,
although some scientists say there are still gaps in knowledge.
This summer, a critical review of existing research in BMJ, The
British Medical Journal, “cast doubt over the size of the effect
of these medications” for the general population, said Dr. Roger
Harrison, an author of the paper, “but still suggested that they
might benefit some people as a treatment.”
Dr. Harrison said he believed that people should generally
increase their intake of omega-3 acids, best done by eating more
fish.
Still, he acknowledged that it was difficult to eat foods
containing a gram of omega-3 acids each day. “If you ask me do I
take omega-3 supplements every day, then, embarrassingly, the
answer is yes,” said Dr. Harrison, a professor at Bolton Primary
Care Trust of the University of Manchester in England.
“I, too, am caught up in this hectic world where I have
little time to shop and prepare the healthy foods I know I should
be eating,” he said.
It seems natural for Italy to be at the forefront of the fish
oil trend and home to the largest clinical trials. Scientists have
long noted that Mediterranean diets are salubrious for the heart
and theorized that the high content of broiled and baked fish
might be partly responsible.
But the landmark Gissi-Prevenzione trial of fish oil had
methodological weaknesses: the patients treated with prescription
fish oil pills were compared with untreated patients, rather than
with patients given a dummy pill. This meant that, despite
impressive results, the trial did not meet the F.D.A.’s
standards for approval. Yet by 2004, regulators in almost all
European countries, including Spain, France and Britain, had
approved Omacor for use in heart attack patients.
Marylou Rowe, a spokeswoman for Reliant Pharmaceuticals, which
owns the license for the drug in the United States, said that
further trials of Omacor would be needed for it to be licensed for
heart attack patients in the United States. But she refused to
discuss a timetable.
The American College of Cardiology now advises patients with
coronary artery disease to increase their consumption of omega-3
acids to one gram a day, but it does not specify if this should be
achieved by eating fish or by taking capsules. But
over-the-counter preparations of fish oil have much less rigorous
quality control and are often blends of the two fish oils know to
be beneficial in heart disease with other less useful fatty acids.
For that reason, Dr. Jacobson of Emory gives the prescription
drug, “off label,” to cardiac patients, even though the F.D.A.
has not approved it for that use. “Then I know exactly what
they’re getting, and there is no mercury,” he said.
He said he tells patients who cannot afford the prescription
version that they can take the over-the-counter supplements,
although there is uncertainty about the dose and they probably
need three to four pills a day.
In Europe, meanwhile, research on prescription fish oil, which
is now thought to act by stabilizing cell membranes, has gained
momentum. The Gissi Group is conducting two huge trials using fish
oil in patients with abnormal heart rhythms and in patients with
heart failure.

|
| 21 |
Omega-3 and Antioxidant Combo Could Ease
Inflammation A combination of Omega-3 fatty acids and the
flavonoid quercitrin (quercetin) may work to reduce inflammation.
Omega-3 fatty acids have previously been linked to a reduction in
markers of inflammation, particularly in relation to
Cardiovascular Disease. For gut health however some studies have
reported that omega-3 supplementation may not be beneficial since
this can impair the colonic antioxidant system. This could
be remedied, say researchers behind the new study, by including an
antioxidant compound, such as the flavonoid quercitrin along with
the omega-3s. The new study is published online in the
Journal "Clinical Nutrition" (doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.
2005.12.009). Adding quercitrin to omega-3s may have an
added advantage of improving stability of the oils which are
susceptible to degradation from oxygen, heat and light. Quercitrin
can be found in Ancient Legacy's Vita Food tablets, SupraLife's
Cell Shield and Youngevity's Anti-Aging Daily Premium Pak. However
studies indicate that other antioxidants may have the same effect.
Antioxidants can be found in most Youngevity products.

|
| 22 |
Scientists investigating the effects of green tea
antioxidant EGCG on mice's brains believe their positive results
may signal its use as a preventive or treatment of Alzheimer's
disease in humans. EGCG is the most potent antioxidant
polyphenol in Green Tea and has been repeatedly studied in labs
for its purported anti-cancer properties. "The
findings suggest that a concentrated component of Green Tea can
decrease brain beta-amyloid plaque formation", said senior
study author Dr. Juan Tan.

|
| 23 |
Curcumin (Turmeric), found extensively in curries,
could boost the body's ability to clear the build up of plaques in
the brain that are linked to Alzheimer's disease, suggest results
from a small laboratory study from the US. Alzheimer's disease is
the most common form of dementia and currently affects over 13
million people worldwide. The direct and indirect cost of
Alzheimer's disease care is over $100 billion dollars. "Curcumin
improved ingestion of amyloid beta by immune cells in 50% of
patients with the disease. These initial findings demonstrate that
curcumin may help boost the immune system in Alzheimer's disease
patients," said Dr. Milan Fiala from the David Geffen School
of Medicine at UCLA.

|
| 24 |
Tomato Juice Prevents Emphysema In Animal Model
Consuming tomato juice "completely" prevented emphysema
in mice exposed to tobacco smoke, report researchers from Japan.
The results suggest smokers and non-smokers exposed to secondhand
smoke could benefit from daily intake of tomato juice (although
you should always avoid tobacco smoke altogether). "Smoke
induced emphysema was completely prevented by concomitant
ingestion of Lycopene from tomato juice", wrote lead author
Satoshi Kasagi in the American Journal of Physiology - Lung
Molecular Physiology. (Published online October 2005)

|
| 25 |
Antibiotic Overuse is common in children with
frequent sinus and ear infections because Doctors routinely
prescribe antibiotics for these conditions.
Antibiotic overuse weakens immune systems by killing off
friendly intestinal flora (Lactobacillus Acidolphilus). “When
good bacteria or friendly flora are destroyed, Candidias (Candida
Albicans) Yeast overgrowth occurs.” Interestingly, kids
with allergies have been found to be deficient in the friendly
flora (Lactobacillus Acidophilus). According to this study
of allergic children, every child in the study was found to be
deficient in this organism.
Did you know? Over sixty percent of all pediatric
doctor’s office visits are for earaches and sinus infections.
Antibiotics are the usual choice of treatment in the US, which I
believe is the biggest contributing factor to antibiotic overuse.
However, antibiotics upset the natural balance in the colon
causing an overgrowth of Yeast (Candida Albicans). In turn,
the overgrowth of yeast and their toxins get absorbed into the
bloodstream causing various allergic reactions. The immune
system has to go into overdrive to remove the toxins and gets
tired, in which the immune system is now compromised.
Repeated rounds of antibiotics, essentially antibiotic overuse,
made my son worse over the course of five years instead of better,
because his immune system was gradually becoming weaker. As
soon as he was done with a ten day round of the antibiotics the
following week he would be ill again. He became antibiotic
resistant and Amoxicillin no longer worked. Antibiotics at a
price of $200.00 or more with $30.00 co-pays became the norm.
I was so frustrated because I did everything the doctors told me
to do and he was worse not better. This is because the
toxins given off by Candida Albicans overgrowth get absorbed into
the blood stream causing various allergic reactions, which weakens
and wears down the immune system.
SOLUTION: Break the cycle of antibiotic overuse and get
the digestive tract & the immune system healthy again the
natural way by restoring the good bacteria that occur naturally in
the intestine. The good bacteria are called friendly Flora
or Acidophilus Lactobacillus, the stuff (live & active
cultures) in yogurt. Only you would have to eat buckets of
yogurt to replenish a healthy supply in your colon.
By taking Lactobacillus Acidophilus in capsule or powder form
you can reverse antibiotic overuse and boost the immune system.
The best L. acidophilus provides 1 to 1.5 billion live cells per
dose.
RESTORE FRIENDLY FLORA NATURALLY with Acidolphilus.
This in turn improves digestion.
IMPROVED DIGESTION = BETTER NUTRITION = HEALTHY IMMUNE SYSTEM.
Dr. Rubin states, “that virtually every state of health is
affected by the GI tract…It all starts in the small and large
intestines… Modern civilizations internal health is threatened
by antibiotic overuse, fluoridated/chlorinated water, unsafe
vaccinations, and etc.”
Note: Friendly flora is also destroyed by too much sugar/carb
intake, alcohol, certain drugs, pollution, environmental toxins,
bacteria laden food, food sensitivities/ allergies, food
additives, and etc. Read the label, you want 1.5 billion
live cells per dose.

|
| 26 |
Prescription drug abuse is rising. The abuse
of prescription drugs in some parts of the world now rivals the
use of all other illegal drugs, the UN's drugs watchdog has said.
The issue is a major problem for the US, Canada and Mexico, the
International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) said in its annual
report. Drug crops replacement schemes had not been
"very effective", it added, and alternative measures
were needed. The smuggling of drugs by mail also increased
in 2005.
Internet pharmacies:
The abuse of prescription drugs, especially painkillers
and inhalants, was identified as a major issue for the three North
American countries by the Vienna-based agency. It expressed
particular concern about the situation in the US, where it said
numerous measures taken by the government had failed to stem the
rise. It is much more complex than initially anticipated to
halt the illicit cultivation of [drug] crops - Hamid Ghodse
President, INCB. Users were from "all age groups,
including schoolchildren", the report said, adding that
nearly 8% of all Americans aged 12 and above were using illicit
drugs. "The sale of controlled drugs from illegally operating
internet pharmacies" was part of the problem, the report
said.
INCB President Hamid Ghodse said he feared the trend
could develop in other parts of the world as well.
Schemes rethink:
The report also said programmes to replace illegal drug
crops with legal crops, particularly opium poppies and coca leaves
grown by farmers in developing nations, had not been working well.
The schemes should be rethought and extended beyond rural
communities to cities "mired in the drug problem", Mr
Ghodse said. However, the report acknowledged that most countries
implementing replacement schemes had seen a drop in growth of
illicit crops.
In Laos, the total area under opium poppy cultivation dropped
by 75% from 1998 to 2004, while in Colombia, the total area under
illicit cocoa bush cultivation decreased by more than 50% from
2000 to 2004. The report said Afghanistan remained the top illicit
opium producer, accounting for 87% of the world's supply in 2005.
The report also urged governments around the world to screen all
routes of incoming and outgoing international mail. It also
recommended limiting the number of entry points for parcels to
control consignments more effectively. The report also highlighted
the rapid increase in the use of the highly addictive synthetic
drug methamphetamine, also known as crystal meth. Story from BBC
NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/europe/4760122.stm
Published: 2006/03/01 00:05:16 GMT

|
| 27 |
Would you like some good news about bird flu for a
change? Scientists in the UK recently tested a standardised
extract of black elderberry called Sambucol. In a laboratory
experiment, Sambucol effectively neutralised the H5N1 bird flu
virus. This is positive, but it's a little too early to call it
promising. If H5N1 mutates into a virus capable of spreading from
human to human, and if Sambucol is effective in neutralising that
mutation, THEN we might really have something. In the meantime,
Sambucol is available right now for use against the seasonal flu.
In the e-Alert "The natural remedy that can halve the
duration of flu" (21/1/04), I told you about Dr. Madeleine
Mumcuoglu, a virologist who created Sambucol by isolating
compounds in black elderberry that disable the protein that
viruses use to infect healthy cells. In two human trials conducted
in Israel and Norway, subjects with the flu who took Sambucol
significantly reduced their recovery period compared to subjects
who were given a placebo. On average, Sambucol subjects in both
studies reduced their recovery time to about three days. Average
recovery time in the placebo groups was between six and seven
days. In another laboratory study conducted in 2001, Sambucol was
shown to increase the production of inflammatory cytokines - the
proteins that regulate the immune system. Researchers believe this
response may help activate the immune response. More research will
be required to fully demonstrate Sambucol's effectiveness in
neutralising flu virus - especially H5N1. In the meantime, you can
find Sambucol through sources on the Internet.

|
| 28 |
Infectious disease and pneumonia prevention and
treatment with essential oils and aromatic medicine.
Essential oils an effective alternative:
Essential oils can offer an effective and yet safer and gentler
alternative to antibiotics. With the rise of antibiotic resistant
bacteria and new and stronger viruses (H5N1), which we call
“super germs,” health practitioners in many countries have
turned to essential oils for treatment of their patients. While
many drugs have only one, two or three active ingredients, an
essential oil may have several hundred compounds, Rose damascene
has over 350 identified compounds along with many others that have
yet to be identified. The complexity of the natural essential oil
compounds is what renders their active ingredients safe when used
according to aromatheraputic guidelines and what prevents the
super germs from becoming resistant.
While essential oils have proven themselves through scientific
examination to be effective in infectious diseases, one of their
finest uses may be found in their ability to slow or render
inactive pathogens and thus prevent a full blown infectious
condition. We will look first at how we can use essential oils to
protect ourselves and our families.
Prevention, what steps you can take to prevent becoming
infected.
Our first line of defense is to prevent contamination at point
of contact with the flu or other infectious germs. According to
the statement by Laurie Garrett, coming in contact with items
touched by those infected with the flu such as doorknobs, shopping
carts, or shaking hands will spread the flu virus. We have several
ways in which to protect ourselves from picking up germs:
The first being to wash your hands frequently with
disinfectant soap and water. Do not use commercial antibacterial
soaps as they only kill the weak germs and thus are helping to
create the strong resistant germs. To your liquid hand soap you
can add 20 to 30 drops of Deep Cleanser to make it antibacterial,
antiviral, and antifungal. Use this often when you are out in
public places or in contact with anyone who has symptoms of cold
or flu. Carry a smaller size of this soap in your purse or in your
pocket so you can use it in public restrooms. Keep in mind this is
a place where you are very likely to come in contact with germs.
In addition to the above hand cleanser, you can make an
antibacterial, antiviral disinfectant spray that can be used on
toilet seats, doorknobs, shopping carts and other areas where you
touch items that other people have touched. To make the spray add
20 to 30 drops of Deep Cleanser to 4 oz of distilled water in a
blue glass bottle with a fine sprayer. Shake well and spray onto
items you want to disinfect. You may want to make up a 2 oz size
to carry with you or for travel. Use 10 to 15 drops of Deep
Cleanser to 2 oz of distilled water in 2 oz size blue spray
bottle, shake well. It is important to start with distilled water
if possible, as most waters have various contaminates.
To make a disinfectant hand lotion (unscented if
possible) you can add a mixture of 10 drops Eucalyptus globulus,
10 drops Tea Tree and 5 drops Peppermint to 4 oz of hand lotion.
This is a good anti-infection hand lotion and is cooling and
pleasant smelling and can be used in place of the waterless
antibacterial hand cleaners that are sold in stores.
Use Deep Cleanser in your washing machine and dishwasher
to prevent germs from being passed between family members. To your
washing machine add 10 to 12 drops when you start the water. To
the dishwasher put 5 to 6 drops in with the soap before starting.
Use Eucalyptus globules as an addition to your household
cleansers to disinfect garbage pails, clean floors and other
household cleaning projects. For a mop bucket you can add 10 to 12
drops when adding the water. For other cleaning projects add 10 to
12 drops per gallon of water used.
To kill germs that are in the air, Lemon oil diffused
has been proven to be the most effective for airborne pathogens.
Diffuse into the air with a good diffuser (electric) for 15
minutes 2 or 3 times a day. You could also alternate or substitute
To Be Well for Lemon if you desire. Make sure to keep your Lemon
oil in a cool place away from heat. Do not leave the lid off for
extended periods of time. If your Lemon oil oxidizes it will not
be as effective as you expect.
During periods of colds and flu, protect yourself and your
family by building your immune system. Use 1st Defense on
your feet or To Be Well for children when you are getting dressed
in the morning and again when you are preparing for bed. 3 to 4
drops of 1st Defense on the bottoms of each foot for adults and 1
drop (1 year olds) 2 drops (2 year olds) or 3 drops (3 years old
to age 10) of To Be Well on each foot for children, the elderly or
those with liver conditions.
At the first sign of throat infection or sore throat,
use Dr. Penoel’s Tea Tree Lick. Place one drop of Tea Tree on
your little finger lick it off, swish around to mix with saliva
and swallow. Can repeat as necessary every 5 minutes up to 5
times. Most people get results by 3 to 4 times and usually the
sore throat does not return. For children 3 years and younger
apply to the throat and gland area topically, dilute 3 to 4 drops
in a teaspoon of grapeseed oil.
What to do if you or someone you know comes down with the
flu:
The first consideration with a viral infection
particularly one as lethal as H5N1 is to realize the rapid rate at
which it multiplies and takes over the body. The best treatment
will be what I call the “French Intensive” method of applying
essential oils as recommended by Dr. Penoel. That is to apply
essential oils frequently and intensively until you see results.
As this particular flu seems to target the lungs and cause death
through a kind of pneumonia we will look at that area first.
You will need a good nubulizer type of diffuser for
inhalation therapy that can deliver a medicinal dose of essential
oils into the air in very close proximity to the person infected
(approximately 1 to 2 feet being careful not to get in the eyes).
At the first indication of the flu begin diffusing 10 drops
Ravensara, 5 drops Lemon and 5 drops Lavender mixed together in
the diffuser. Diffuse until oil is gone or up to 15 minutes.
Repeat this application 3 to 4 times a day. Ravensara oil is
specific for pneumonia, Lemon kills germs and Lavender helps to
heal the lung tissue.
Alternate the above application with 15 to 20 drops of Breath
of Life to a quart of water in a cold water vaporizer. Use between
applications of the nubulizer diffuser. May also vaporize Breath
of Life at night while the person is sleeping.
Ravensara can also be applied to the soles of the feet 3 to 6
drops on each foot for adults can reapply every hour until you see
results then 4 times a day until symptoms are gone. 1 drop on
children 1 year or less (Ravensara is safe at this application
amount for newborns), 2 drops for 2 year olds and 3 drops for
children 3 to 10 years old. For children apply 3 to 4 times a day.
As I stated before, Ravensara is very effective and has an
affinity for pneumonia type conditions and has been very effective
with application through the feet.
Breath of Life can be diluted 6 to 10 drops in a tablespoon of
grapeseed oil and used as a rub on the chest and back over the
lung area and then apply a warm towel or other warmth holding
fabric to the area. For children under the age of 6 use 3 to 6
drops in a tablespoon of grapeseed. Children under 3 years of age
use 1 drop of Ravensara and 1 drop of Eucalyptus radiata to 1
tablespoon of grapeseed oil and use in place of the Breath of
Life.
1st Defense applied to the soles of the feet to boost the
immune response, for adults applying 3 to 4 drops on the sole of
each foot every hour during the time you are awake for up to 8 to
10 applications when you first begin to come down with the flu.
May use this application directly after the Ravensara foot
application.
For children use To Be Well instead of 1st Defense applied to
the soles of the feet to boost immune response. 1 drop on sole of
each foot ages 1year, 2 drops ages 2 years and 3 drops ages 3 to
10 years, every hour for up to 5 hours then every 4 hours if they
are still awake. This application can follow directly after the
application of Ravensara to the feet. Children under the age of 6
months use 1 drop Ravensara instead of To Be Well. This
recommendation is slightly different than what we had for
prevention as it is to be used more intensely which delivers more
essential oil to the blood stream.
Eucalyptus radiata can be added to water and used as a sponge
bath to help control fever. You can add 10 to 12 drops of
Eucalyptus radiata to a quart jar of room temperature to slightly
cool but not cold distilled water, shake it up well and pour into
a bowl. Soak a wash cloth and wipe down the body of the person
with the fever to reduce their temperature. The content of 1.8
cineole will help the body not to exceed a safe temperature. Make
sure to monitor the person as Eucalyptus can cool a person very
quickly and make them chill.
If the patient is in serious condition or is not responding
quickly enough they may need to take essential oils internally.
For adults you can make up capsules of essential oils diluted in
olive oil and for children you can dilute the essential oil and
then add it to applesauce. The following essential oils are on the
GRAS list as generally regarded as safe for consumption. Still
keep in mind that phenols found in essential oils can irritate
mucus membranes. Do not swallow these oils without containing them
inside a capsule to protect the tissue of the esophagus.
For adults who do not have a history of liver problems (phenols
are hard on the liver), you may take the large 00 gelatin capsules
sold at health food stores, remove the top and fill the large
bottom section ¾ full of olive oil. Next add 1 drop of Thyme ct.
thymol, 1 drop of cinnamon, and 1 drop of clove. Replace the cap
and take 1 to 2 capsules 3 times a day. If you do not experience
stomach irritation you can increase your drops to 2 of each of the
recommended essential oils. If you experience stomach irritation,
dilute your essential oils (1 drop of each) into 1 teaspoon of
olive oil and then fill your capsules with the more diluted oil.
Do not make up more capsules than you can use in 2 to 3 days as
they may deteriorate or dissolve.
For children 3 years and older you may mix 1 drop of Tea Tree,
1 drop of Ravensara and 1 drop of Eucalyptus radiata into 1
teaspoon of olive oil. From this diluted mixture you can add 1
drop of oil mix to a tablespoon of applesauce and give to the
child 3 times a day. Children, under age 3, do not give them
essential oils internally but use on the feet. The children’s
oils are non-toxic as recommended.
Along with the above protocol, you may need to address
depression and anxiety caused when people experience severe
traumatic situations and loss. To help sleep and physical
relaxation you can apply To Be At Peace to a tissue and slip
inside the pillow case of the person when the are in bed. It can
also be diffused when you are not diffusing something else.
Geranium is a good balancing and anti-depressive essential oil
and could also be diffused or applied to a tissue. The same with
Lavender, which is known to be a natural relaxer.
To conclude: There are a couple of more
recommendations I have for combating the flu. First and foremost,
you should eliminate fast foods, sugar, and highly processed foods
from your diet as they deplete the immune system and the body.
Secondly, you should be supplementing your diet with all the
essential 90 nutrients that your body requires to function
properly. There are also two other products that I would recommend
and that is the Super KB for its ability to help regulate the
build up of water in the body, and the Immu-911, which can help to
build the function of the immune system.
Disclaimer: This material is for educational
purposes only to make people aware of the coming threat of the
Avian Flu, and other flu virus’. It does not constitute a
medical recommendation. It you believe you are sick or about to
become sick you should consult a profession health care provider.
Preferably one who is familiar with nutrition and aromatherapy.

|
| 29 |
I hope none of us ever need to use this information
but if so, it could be a Life Saver. RECOGNIZING A STROKE During a
BBQ a friend stumbled and took a little fall - she assured
everyone that she was fine (they offered to call paramedics) and
had just tripped over a brick because of her new shoes. They got
her cleaned up and got her a new plate of food. While she appeared
a bit shaken up, Ingrid went about enjoying herself the rest of
the evening. Ingrid's husband called later telling everyone that
his wife had been taken to the hospital (at 6:00pm, Ingrid passed
away.) She had suffered a stroke at the BBQ - had they known how
to identify the signs of a stroke perhaps Ingrid would be with us
today. It only takes a minute to read this- ----- A neurologist
says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he can
totally reverse the effects of a stroke...totally. He said the
trick was getting a stroke recognized, diagnosed and getting to
the patient within 3 hours which is tough. Thank God for the sense
to remember the "3" steps. Read and Learn! Sometimes
symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify. Unfortunately, the
lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer
brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of
a stroke. Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by
asking three simple questions: 1. *Ask the individual to SMILE. 2.
*Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS. 3. *Ask the person to SPEAK A
SIMPLE SENTENCE (Coherently) (i.e. It is sunny out today) If he or
she has trouble with any of these tasks, call 999 immediately and
describe the symptoms to the ambulance. After discovering that a
group of non-medical volunteers could identify facial weakness,
arm weakness and speech problems, researchers urged the general
public to learn the three questions. They presented their
conclusions at the American Stroke Association's annual meeting
last February. Widespread use of this test could result in prompt
diagnosis and treatment of the stroke and prevent brain damage.

|
| 30 |
A new study researching the effects of salt intake
suggests that people who reported eating less salt than is
recommended by UK and US government guidelines were 37 percent
more likely to die from cardiovascular causes than those who ate
more. Dr. Hillel Cohen and colleagues from the Albert Einstein
College of Medicine in New York, including Dr. Michael Alderman,
President of the International Society of Hypertension, completed
the follow-up study with data from the National Health &
Nutrition Examination Surveys in the US. "This was an
observational study, and not a clinical trial, so we can't really
conclude from our findings that low sodium intakes are harmful.
But our study certainly doesn't support the idea of a universal
prescription for lower salt intake," said Dr. Cohen. He also
said that the study shows that even after adjusting for total
calorie intake, age, and smoking status, people who had less than
the recommended daily salt intake were significantly more likely
to have died from cardiovascular causes than people who ate more
salt.

|
| 31 |
A calcium ``salt'' contains calcium along with
another substance, such as carbonate or gluconate. Some calcium
salts have more calcium (elemental calcium) than others. For
example, the amount of calcium in calcium carbonate is greater
than that in calcium gluconate. To give you an idea of how
different calcium supplements vary in calcium content, the
following chart explains how many tablets of each type of
supplement will provide 1000 milligrams of elemental calcium. When
you look for a calcium supplement, be sure the number of
milligrams on the label refers to the amount of elemental calcium,
and not to the strength of each tablet.
| Calcium supplement |
Strength of each tablet (in milligrams) |
Amount of elemental calcium per tablet (in
milligrams) |
Number of tablets to provide 1000
milligrams of calcium |
| Calcium carbonate |
625 |
250 |
4 |
|
650 |
260 |
4 |
|
750 |
300 |
4 |
|
835 |
334 |
3 |
|
1250 |
500 |
2 |
|
1500 |
600 |
2 |
| Calcium citrate |
950 |
200 |
5 |
| Calcium gluconate |
500 |
45 |
22 |
|
650 |
58 |
17 |
|
1000 |
90 |
11 |
| Calcium lactate |
325 |
42 |
24 |
|
650 |
84 |
12 |
| Calcium phosphate, dibasic |
500 |
115 |
9 |
| Calcium phosphate, tribasic |
800 |
304 |
4 |
|
1600 |
608 |
2 |
|
| 32 |
Low Selenium Linked To Higher Risk of Osteoarthritis
Insufficient levels of Selenium may raise the risk of knee
osteoarthritis, US researchers reported this week. A team from the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill found that for every
additional tenth of a part per million of selenium in volunteer's
bodies, there was a 15-20 percent decrease in the risk of knee
osteoarthritis.
"Our results suggest that we might be able to
prevent or delay osteoarthritis of the knees and possibly other
joints in some people if they are not getting enough
selenium", said study leader Dr. Joanne Jordan. The findings
were reported in San Diego, California at the annual meeting of
the American College of Rheumatology.

|
| 33 |
New Help for Arthritis Sufferers, Suggests Study A
naturally occurring compound supplement - methylsulfonylmethane -
(MSM) - could offer arthritis sufferers short-term relief from
knee pain. A new study, entitled "Efficacy of
Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) in Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Pilot
Clinical Trial," suggested that the popular dietary
supplement, which contains sulfur, could help
reduce the number of
knee replacements carried out each year.
Sulfur is well known to
be beneficial for the body's connective tissues, and MSM is a
popular supplement. The authors of the new study, Linda Kim,
Leslie Axelrod, Nick Buratovich, and Robert Waters all from the
Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine in Arizona and Paul
Howard of the Arthritis Health Center in Arizona, presented their
findings at the recent 20th Annual Meeting
of the American
Association of Naturopathic Physicians.

|
| 34 |
Dr Joel Wallach had this disease renamed after him -
Wallach's vertigo. His theory is that calcium deficiency causes
overgrowth of the bone matrix leading to pressure on a nerve
coming through the skull. He suggests 2000mg calcium with 1000mg
magnesium daily in divided doses.

|
| 35 |
Please understand that the key to
good health is COMMON SENSE!
If the dosage is one of
something, please don't take two because 'it must be twice
as good'. This simply isn't true!
Pay attention to the ingredients and their
amounts on everything you take. You don't want to overdose on Vit.
A or manganese. Vit. A gross overdose has been known to cause
brain tumors. Manganese overdose could contribute to Parkinson's.
Too much magnesium will give you diarrhea, for instance. So don't
take another product as well if you are getting enough of
something in one product. Pay attention! Consult "How
much you need". KNOW your nutrients!
If you feel awful, it might be because you
are taking TOO MUCH of everything rather than too little! Back off
everything and start again, one at a time, slowly and listen to
the results your body gives!
LISTEN TO YOUR BODY is the most important wisdom
of all! It is smarter than you are and it tells you when you need
something or when it has too much. Pay attention to what it is
telling you when it craves this or rejects that. You would be as
amazed as I am when you compare what it craves this week with the
symptom of the deficiency you are suffering this week! It is
uncannily accurate when you aren't!
Everyone should start with half the dosage on
the bottle and see if that helps before increasing to the stated
dose (meant for a 240 lb. man!).
LESS IS BETTER than 'more' for your body.
America has a real mental problem with that. Your body takes a
hint from very little and gets to work immediately. Just give it a
chance. Don't be one of the many who are killing themselves simply
from gross EXCESS!
For instance, don't ask yourself "Can
I eat more on a second helping?" Instead ask half way
through "Is this enough to sustain me for now? Until the next
meal?" You will be surprised the first time you try this
attitude. And your body will thank you! A meal is not a contest.
The same concept is true with our products. If
you take something like Tangy Tangerine today, with all the
requirements of all supplements (except calcium), then don't also
take an energy drink like Rebound or EQ Factor or Sports Tech that
has the same things in it (just about). One or the other! Or add
the energy drink when needed, AFTER you have done something to
deplete what you have taken, like mowing the grass or playing a
basketball game USE COMMON SENSE!
And understand that YOUNGEVITY is a company that
has combined many companies, so it has much duplication of types
of products. Choose one! For instance, don't take Glucogel, Joint
Plus and Flex Flow on the same day. Those are the same joint
category in 3 different companies that merged. Flex Flow is
SupraLife, Joint Plus is Ancient Legacy, and Glucogel is either
Ultimate (if caps) or Majestic Earth (if liquid). You only need
one... Consult "Categories"
and choose one (or 2 if theraputic amount required). But
KNOW what is required and KNOW what you are taking!
So PLEASE pay attention, and PLEASE use COMMON
SENSE! That's the only way to good health.
Advised with love and caring, Kingmaker

|
| 36 |
PLEASE PASS THIS ON. THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF!
----- Warning - medication - drug being recalled
This was sent out, I had it checked by the Manager of the
chemist at Garden City Clinic and apparently this is correct.
All drugs containing PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE are being recalled.
You may want to try calling the 800 number listed on most drug
boxes and inquire about a REFUND.
Please read this CAREFULLY. Also, please pass this on. STOP
TAKING anything containing this ingredient. It has been linked to
increased hemorrhagic stroke (bleeding in brain) among women ages
18-49 in the three days after starting use of medication.
Problems were not found in men, but the FDA recommended that
everyone (even children) seek alternative Medicine.
The following medications contain Phenylpropanolamine:
Acutrim Diet Gum Appetite Suppressant
Acutrim Plus Dietary Supplements
Acutrim Maximum Strength Appetite Control
Alka-Seltzer Plus Children's Cold Medicine Effervescent
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold medicine (cherry or orange)
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold Medicine Original
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Cough Medicine Effervescent
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Flu Medicine
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Sinus Effervescent
Alka Seltzer Plus Night-Time Cold Medicine
BC Allergy Sinus Cold Powder
BC Sinus Cold Powder
Comtrex Flu Therapy & Fever Relief
Day & Night Contac 12-Hour Cold Capsules
Contac 12 Hour Caplets
Coricidin D Cold, Flu & Sinus
Dexatrim Caffeine Free
Dexatrim Extended Duration
Dexatrim Gelcaps
Dexatrim Vitamin C/Caffeine Free
Dimetapp Cold & Allergy Chewable Tablets
Dimetapp Cold & Cough Liqui-Gels
Dimetapp DM Cold & Cough Elixir
Dimetapp Elixir Dimetapp 4 Hour Liquid Gels
Dimetapp 4 Hour Tablets
Dimetapp 12 Hour Extentabs Tablets
Naldecon DX Pediatric Drops
Permathene Mega-16
Robitussin CF
Tavist-D 12 Hour Relief of Sinus & Nasal Congestion
Triaminic DM Cough Relief
Triaminic Expectorant Chest & Head
Triaminic Syrup Co ld & Allergy
Triaminic Triaminicol Cold & Cough
I just found out and called the 800# on the container for
Triaminic and they informed me that they are voluntarily recalling
the following medicines because of a certain ingredient that is
causing strokes and seizures in children:
Orange 3D Cold & Allergy Cherry (Pink)
3D Cold & Cough Berry
3D Cough Relief Yellow
3D Expectorant
They are asking you to call them at 800-548-3708 with the lot
number on the box so they can send you postage for you to send it
back to them, and they will also issue you a refund. If you know
of anyone else with small children - DO PASS ALONG TO ALL ON YOUR
MAILING LIST so people are informed. They can then pass it along
to their families.
To confirm these findings please take time to check the
following: http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/ppa/
<http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/ppa/>
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO YOUR CHILDREN IN CASE THEY GIVE IT TO
THEIR CHILDREN OR TO FRIENDS WHO HAVE CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN

|
| 37 |
Omega-3 and Antioxidant Combo Could Ease
Inflammation
A combination of Omega-3 fatty acids and the flavonoid
quercitrin (quercetin) may work to reduce inflammation. Omega-3
fatty acids have previously been linked to a reduction in markers
of inflammation, particularly in relation to Cardiovascular
Disease.
For gut health however some studies have reported that omega-3
supplementation may not be beneficial since this can impair the
colonic antioxidant system. This could be remedied, say
researchers behind the new study, by including an antioxidant
compound, such as the flavonoid quercitrin along with the
omega-3s.
The new study is published online in the Journal "Clinical
Nutrition" (doi: 10.1016/j.clnu. 2005.12.009). Adding
quercitrin to omega-3s may have an added advantage of improving
stability of the oils which are susceptible to degradation from
oxygen, heat and light.
Quercitrin can be found in Ancient Legacy's Vita Food tablets,
SupraLife's Cell Shield and Youngevity's Anti-Aging Daily Premium
Pak. However studies indicate that other antioxidants may have the
same effect. Antioxidants can be found in most Youngevity
products.
(Remember SELENIUM is the grandaddy of anti-oxidants!) (Martha
- WallachWisdom.org)

|
| 38 |
Pneumonia 'needs less treatment'
Shorter courses of antibiotics can be used to treat pneumonia
Doctors can safely treat community acquired pneumonia with fewer
antibiotics, say Dutch researchers. Current guidance
recommends antibiotic treatment for seven to 10 days but little
evidence supports this strategy. A study published in
the British Medical Journal found that three days of antibiotic
treatment were just as good as an eight-day course.
Experts said shorter drug courses may be effective in other
infections and would help fight antibiotic resistance. Community
acquired pneumonia is one of the most important reasons for the
prescribing of antibiotics in hospitals, and reducing treatment
duration could result in a big drop in use of the drugs.
"For a lot of antibiotics we don't really know what the
optimum treatment is" Dr John Paul, consultant
microbiologist. Researchers compared the effectiveness
of discontinuing treatment with amoxicillin after three days or
eight days in 119 adults admitted to nine hospitals in the
Netherlands with mild to moderate-severe community acquired
pneumonia. In patients treated for three days and eight
days, the clinical success rate at day 10 was 93%. By day
28, the effectiveness of three-day treatment was 90% compared with
88% for eight day treatment. Both groups had similar
improvement in symptoms, x-ray results, and length of hospital
stay.
However, the researchers did not look at people who had severe
pneumonia. Antibiotic resistance Dr Jan Prins, lead
researcher at the Department of Internal Medicine at the Academic
Medical Centre in Amsterdam, said there were no studies which had
looked at this issue. "What we found was it was
completely the same for three or eight days for the vast majority
of patients with pneumonia.
"There was a study published last year which showed there
is a correlation between antibiotic used in the community and
resistance so if we can reduce consumption while still getting
results that is important. " In an accompanying
commentary, Dr John Paul, consultant microbiologist at the Royal
Sussex County Hospital in Brighton, said the study suggested
current guidelines recommending treatment for seven to 10 days
should be revised.
Wisdom "For a lot of antibiotics we don't really know what
the optimum treatment is. "It's amazing that a simple
thing like community acquired pneumonia hasn't been properly
addressed but this study done with statistical rigour has shown
that treatment for seven to 10 days is not necessary."
"The perceived wisdom is that its a bad thing to expose
people to antibiotics unnecessarily. "The guidelines
should be looked at by the British Thoracic Society," he said
and added that in the mean time individual physicians were free to
use shorter courses of antibiotics if they felt comfortable doing
so.
Professor Richard Wise, chair of the government's
specialist advisory committee on antimicrobial resistance, said:
"Community-acquired pneumonia is an important and common
disease for which antibiotics are currently indicated.
"Anything that reduced exposure of patients to antibiotics
reduces the possibility of emergence of resistance is to be
welcomed."

|
| 39 |
For inflammation of the colon, I have found that the
following helps me a lot:
-Omega 3 LONG CHAIN essential fatty acids (EPA and DHA)
-Aloe vera capsules
-Acidophilus
-Selenium
Try it. You may also find the help that I did.

|
| 40 |
Don't let this governor steal your medical
freedom...
I am mad as Hell. And you should be too. The drug company Merck
has bought control of the Texas governor's mansion. And your state
could be next. Last week, the governor of Texas signed an
executive order mandating the vaccination of all preteen girls
with Merck's new vaccine for cervical cancer.
Gardasil is a vaccine against human papilloma virus (HPV),
which can cause cervical cancer. This virus is spread only through
sexual contact. Not through coughing, sneezing, or stepping on a
nail. And regular PAP smear tests can detect it before it becomes
cancer (and there's an easy treatment for a positive PAP test,
which I'll explain in a moment). So at best, the vaccine isn't
necessary.
At it's worst, though, the vaccine is very dangerous. If you
get pregnant within one month after vaccination, there's a higher
risk of birth defects. And that's just the beginning. This
vaccine, like most vaccines, has aluminum in it. I've shown you in
the past how aluminum causes many health problems, including
Alzheimer's disease and heart problems.
The study conducted on Gardasil proved this point very clearly.
The researchers split 21,000 subjects into two different groups.
One received the vaccine. The other received a placebo.
Surprisingly, both groups had a few participants who suffered from
arthritis after the shots. And the overwhelming majority of both
groups had adverse effects, such as local reactions (rashes,
etc.).
Sounds like it couldn't be the vaccine, could it, since the
placebo shot recipients had similar problems? Ah, the devil's in
the details. Turns out both the vaccine and the placebo had one
thing in common - they both contained aluminum! And both groups
discovered that aluminum is indeed a poison.
While I hate vaccines for this very reason, I hate the drug
company's manipulation of the government even worse. It's one
thing to offer these poisons on the open market, where you have
the freedom to decide if you want to take it or not. It's another
thing completely to mandate these poisons.
This would be bad enough if the drug were proven beyond a
shadow of a doubt to be good for you. But I don't know of any such
drug. And Gardasil is far from proven. The vaccine has no known
period of protection (requiring boosters every few years - and
more aluminum). Furthermore, the studied population was only
followed for 18 months. There's no data on long-term
repercussions. Even the FDA admits, "Gardasil has not been
evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or
genotoxicity." Why? The researchers didn't look for it, and
the FDA didn't require it for initial approval.
How was Merck able to pull this off in Texas? First, the Texas
governor received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee
during his re-election campaign. One of Merck's three lobbyists in
Texas is Mike Toomey, the governor's former chief of staff. His
current chief of staff's mother-in-law is state Rep. Dianne White
Delisi. She is a state director for an organization called Women
in Government. Merck provides funding for this organization, which
is busy working on compulsory Gardasil vaccination for school
entry. Are you connecting the dots?
I am astounded that government and the public would buy into
another product with limited testing (and huge known aluminum
risks) from Merck - a company that wantonly kept a killer drug (Vioxx)
on the market. Do you really trust this company to look after your
well being? I sure don't. This whole thing stinks to me. I hope
it's putrid to you. The billions this political coupe will reap
Merck will help the company offset the huge financial losses
coming from the Vioxx lawsuits.
Can you do anything about it? First, if you have children or
grandchildren in the target population, take all measures to
protect them. Sign a religious waiver for all school required
vaccines. If you are in Texas, storm Governor Perry's office with
mail about this brazen surrender to Big Pharma. Demand your
legislators to hold him accountable. Bring it up at school PTA
meetings.
If you don't live in Texas, do the same in your state. Merck
wields enormous power nationwide and your state could be next. The
Merck Gardasil steamroller is moving fast and may already be
unstoppable. A similar bill is working its way through the
Virginia congress. And 18 other states are already considering
such a bill.
Consider boycotting anything made by Merck. In future elections
demand an accounting of all campaign contributions from Big Pharma
for a candidate to receive your vote. Express your outrage in
letters to the editor.
And what about cervical cancer? Women not sexually active or
who are monogamous have a very low risk of cervical cancer (unless
their partner is promiscuous). PAP smears are one of the few
screening tests that pass muster with me. They are a must for
women with multiple exposures. If your sexual values (morals) are
high, and you practice safe sex, and you get yearly PAPs, the
benefit, if any, from this vaccine is greatly diminished or non
existent.
If you have a positive PAP screen, cheap vitamin A is one of
the best treatments for any type of skin or papilloma virus. I've
seen many abnormal (but non-cancerous) PAPs reverse with 100,000
units daily along with 15 mg of folic acid.
Yours for better health and medical freedom,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
For continuing information on Big Pharma corruption, sign up
for the outstanding ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION (AHRP)
alerts at www.ahrp.org and www.ahrp.blogspot.com

|
| 41 |
Vitamins 'benefit divers' health'
Vitamin doses can reduce ill-effects of scuba diving on divers'
circulation, a study suggests. The scientists from Croatia and
Norway gave vitamins C and E, which work as antioxidants,
to divers, the Journal of Physiology reported. The vitamins
stopped ill-effects of the dive on the cells lining blood vessels,
which can lead to high blood pressure and other associated diving
problems. But diving experts said the vitamins would have a
limited impact.
The intervention showed a positive effect
Ante Obad, lead researcher The researchers, from the University
of Split School of Medicine in Croatia and the Norwegian
University of Science and Technology carried out the study on
seven professional divers before a 30-minute, 30-metre dive. They
performed two dives 24 hours apart, with doses of vitamins C and E
administered two hours before the second one.
Six of the divers took part in a second trial eight months
later, in which some were given antioxidants while others received
a dummy pill. The team found that antioxidant treatment prevented
endothelial dysfunction, which stops the cells lining blood
vessels working properly, causing high blood pressure.
High blood pressure is relatively common in divers and can lead
to conditions such as pulmonary oedema - fluid on the lungs which
can be found in divers.
Decompression
It is thought endothelial dysfunction is caused by gas bubbles
getting into the circulatory system during and after decompression
from dives.
Lead researcher Ante Obad said: "The intervention showed a
positive effect. Although generally safe, diving may be associated
with serious, and sometimes fatal consequences, which are usually
related to decompression sickness. "This raises the
possibility that pre-dive intake of antioxidant vitamins may
prevent some of the negative effects of diving."
But a spokesman for the London Diving Chamber, which offers
medical advice and treatment to divers, said the use of
antioxidants such as vitamins C and E would have a limited effect.
"Antioxidants basically remove excess by-products form
the blood system. But the impact on diving-related illnesses
would be pretty insignificant. "Divers do not routinely take
them."
Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/health/6314901.stm
Published: 2007/02/05 00:02:00 GMT © BBC MMVII

|
| 42 |
Hopes for Alzheimer's treatment Scientists at
Cardiff University have developed a potential treatment for
Alzheimer's disease. Researchers said they had created an antibody
which could block the production of brain chemicals linked to the
debilitating disease. Dr Emma Kidd, who led the research team,
said the results of the tests were "highly encouraging".
There is no known cure for Alzheimer's, which causes irreversible
loss of brain function and memory. The disease affects one in 20
people aged over 65 and a fifth of all people aged over 80 in the
UK. The results of the study show that it is possible to decrease
production of a protein called amyloid, which is believed to be
the main cause of the disease. Brain functions Deposits of amyloid
build up in the brain, preventing it from functioning properly.
The antibody will reduce this build-up, improving the patient's
memory and quality of life, the researchers claim. Dr Kidd said:
"Our results are highly encouraging at this stage. "We
believe that our approach could lead in time to a new therapy for
this distressing and debilitating disease as it should prevent or
reduce the irreversible deterioration of a patient's memory and
other brain functions. "This would also reduce the burden on
carers, usually family members, who look after patients in the
earlier stages of the disease." Funding Dr Kidd added that it
was possible the antibody could be used as a preventative
treatment for people with a family history of Alzheimer's. The
work was carried out at the university's Welsh School of Pharmacy
and was funded by the Alzheimer's Society. A final treatment could
take several years to develop and the team are now seeking more
money for the next stage of the work. Professor Clive Ballard,
from the Alzheimer's Society, said he was "thrilled" to
have funded the work. He added: "We hope people will
understand how important it is to invest more in research into all
types of dementia, so that we eventually may have a selection of
new treatments to change the lives of people with dementia and
their carers." The research will be published on Friday in
the Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/wales/6201195.stm
Published: 2006/12/22 00:28:05 GMT © BBC MMVI

|
| 43 |
Pillows can harbour harmful fungi A small thought to
help you sleep when you next get your head down - a study shows
the average pillow is home to a host of potentially-harmful fungi.
A University of Manchester team found up to 16 types of fungi in
pillows they analysed, the Allergy journal reported. Researchers
said feather pillows had fewer species than synthetic versions,
particularly in the case of a fungus which exacerbates asthma.
Experts advise disinfecting pillows but say fungi occur in most
environments. The researchers took samples from 10 pillows - five
feather and five synthetic - which had been used for between 18
months and 20 years. The fungal spores found in the pillows fed
off human skins scales and dust mite faeces. Fungal contamination
of bedding was first uncovered by studies carried out in the
1930s, but few studies have been done since then. I think it is
still advisable to disinfect pillows and buy feather ones to help
reduce the exposure in the home Dr Geoffrey Scott, of the Fungal
Research Trust Researchers found that all 10 pillows had a
"substantial fungal load" with between four to 16
different species being identified on each, Allergy reported on
its website. The microscopic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus was
particularly evident in synthetic pillows. This fungus commonly
invades the lungs and sinuses and can worsen asthma. It is also
known to cause infection in leukaemia and bone marrow transplant
patients. The team also found pillows which contained fungi as
diverse as bread and vine moulds. Some also had fungi which would
usually be found on damp walls. Lead researcher Professor Ashley
Woodcock said the findings showed there was a "miniature
ecosystem" operating inside pillows. Sleeping He added:
"Since people spend a third of their life sleeping and
breathing close to a potentially large and varied source of fungi,
these findings certainly have important implications for patients
with respiratory disease - especially asthma and sinusitis."
Dr Geoffrey Scott, chairman of the Fungal Research Trust, which
funded the study, said the findings were interesting. "I
think particularly for asthma patients this is relevant. These
fungi are found in the environment, so we are exposed to them
everywhere. "But I think it is still advisable to disinfect
pillows and buy feather ones to help reduce the exposure in the
home." A spokesperson for the charity Asthma UK said:
"We are aware that patients at the severe end of the spectrum
of asthma are more likely to be hypersensitive to fungi than
others with asthma. "If you think that fungi could be a
trigger for you, you should consult your GP or asthma nurse for
advice." Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/health/4339306.stm
Published: 2005/10/14 23:58:46 GMT © BBC MMVI

|
| 44 |
COSTCO! read this whole article...especially the
end!
Today, WalMart announced it is starting a new policy in Tampa
where all generic drugs will be sold for $4.00 per prescription.
COSTCO! read this... Let's hear it for Costco!! (This is just
mind-boggling!) Make sure you read all the way past the list of
the drugs. The woman that signed below is a Budget Analyst out of
federal Wash ington , DC offices.
Did you ever wonder how much it costs a drug company for the
active ingredient in prescription medications? Some people think
it must cost a lot, since many drugs sell for more than $2.00 per
tablet. We did a search of offshore chemical synthesizers that
supply the active ingredients found in drugs approved by the FDA.
As we have revealed in past issues of Life Extension, a
significant percentage of drugs sold in the United States contain
active ingredients made in other countries. In our independent
investigation of how much profit drug companies really make, we
obtained the actual price of active ingredients used in some of
the most popular drugs sold in America
The data below speaks for itself.
Celebrex: 100 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $130.27 Cost of
general active ingredients: $ 0.60 Percent markup: 21,712%
Claritin: 1 0 mg Consumer Price (100 tablets): $215.17 Cost of
general active ingredients: $0.71 Percent markup: 30,306% Keflex:
250 mg Consumer Price (100 tablets): $157.39 Cost of general
active ingredients: $1.88 Percent markup: 8,372%
Lipitor: 20 mg Consumer Price (100 tablets): $272.37 Cost of
general active ingredients: $5.80 Percent markup: 4,696%
Norvasc: 10 mg Cost of general active ingredients: $0.14
Percent markup: 134,493%
Paxil: 20 mg Consume r price (100 tablets): $220.27 Cost of
general active ingredients: $7.60 Percent markup: 2,898%
Prevacid: 30 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $44.77 Cost of
general active ingredients: $1.01 Percent markup: 34,136%
Prilosec: 20 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $360.97 Cost of
general active ingredients $0.52 Percent markup: 69,417%
Prozac: 20 mg Consumer price (100 tablets) : $247.47 Cost of
general active ingredients: $0.11 Percent markup: 224,973%
Tenormin: 50 mg Consumer price (100 t ablets): $104.47 Cost of
general active ingredients: $0.13 Percent markup: 80,362%
Vasotec: 10 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $102.37 Cost of
general active ingredients: $0.20 Percent markup: 51,185%
Xanax: 1 mg Consumer price (100 tablets) : $136.79 Cost of
general active ingredients: $0.024 Percent markup: 569,958%
Zestril: 20 mg Consumer price (100 tablets) $89.89 Cost of
general active ingredients $3.20 Percent markup: 2,809
Zithromax: 600 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $1,482.19 Cost
of general active ingredients: $18.78 Percent markup: 7,892%
Zocor: /B 40 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $350.27 Cost of
general active ingredients: $8.63 Percent markup: 4,059%
Zoloft: 50 mg Consumer price: $206.87 Cost of general active
ingredients: $1.75 Percent markup: 11,821%
Since the cost of prescription drugs is so outrageous, I
thought everyone should know about this. Please read the following
and pass it on. It pays to shop around. This helps to solve the
mystery as to why they can afford to put a Walgreen's on every
corner
On Monday night, Steve Wilson, an investigative reporter for
Channel 7 News in Detroit , did a story on generic drug price
gouging by pharmacies. He found in his investigation, that some of
these generic drugs were marked up as much as 3,000% or more. Yes,
that's not a typo.....three thousand percent! So o ften, we blame
the drug companies for the high cost of drugs, and usually
rightfully so.
But in this case, the fault clearly lies with the pharmacies
themselves. For example, if you had to buy a prescription drug,
and bought the name brand, you might pay $100 for 100 pills. The
pharmacist might tell you that if you get the generic equivalent,
they would only cost $80, making you think you are
"saving" $20. What the pharmacist is not telling you is
that those 100 generic pills may have only cost him $10!
At the end of the report, one of the anchors asked Mr. Wilson
whether or not there were any pharmacies that did not adhere to
this practice, and he said that Costco consistently charged little
over their cost for the generic drugs. I went to the Costco site,
where you can look up any drug, and get its online price. It says
that the in-store prices are consistent with the online prices. I
was appalled.
Just to give you one example from my own experience, I had to
use the drug, Compazine, which helps prevent nausea in chemo
patients. I used the generic equivalent, which cost $54.99 for 60
pills at CVS. I checked the price at Costco, and I could have
bought 100 pills for $19.89. For 145 of my pain pills, I paid
$72.57. I could have got 150 at Costco for $28.08. I would like to
mention, that although Costco is a "membership" type
store, you do NOT have to be a member to buy prescriptions there,
as it is a federally regulated substance. You just tell them at
the door that you wish to use the pharmacy, and they will let you
in. (this is true) I went there this past Thursday and asked them.
I am asking each of you to please help me by copying this
letter, and passing it into your own e-mail, and send it to
everyone you know with an e-mail address.
Sharon L. Davis Budget Analyst U.S Department of Commerce Room
6839 Office Ph: 202-482-4458 Office Fax: 202-482-5480 E-mail
Address: sdavis@doc.gov

|
| 45 |
Curry spice 'help for arthritis' Turmeric adds
flavour and colour to curries and other foods Extract of a spice
used in curry could help prevent rheumatoid arthritis and
osteoporosis, US research suggests. Turmeric has been used for
centuries in Asian medicine to treat inflammatory disorders and
its extract can be found in western dietary supplements. Now lab
work by University of Arizona researchers, in Arthritis &
Rheumatism, shows just how the spice's curcuminoid extracts have a
therapeutic effect. Experts say new drugs may be found, but eating
more spices is unlikely to work. The researchers said clinical
trials were needed before turmeric supplements could be
recommended for medicinal use. Turmeric extract Earlier work by
the University of Arizona team showed turmeric could prevent joint
inflammation in rats. In their latest study, they set out to find
exactly what ingredient in turmeric was having the
anti-inflammatory effect. They prepared extracts from the rhizome,
or root of the turmeric plant, and compared them against the
commercially available products that contain turmeric extracts.
Results of tests in animal models of arthritis are not always
reproduced in human rheumatoid arthritis. Dr Ann Barton,
Manchester University A version of turmeric extract that was free
of essential oils was found to most closely match the composition
of the commercial supplements. And it was this extract, containing
curcumin, that was most effective at blocking the onset of
rheumatoid arthritis in the rats. The extract appears to work by
prevent a protein that controls when genes are switched on or off
from being activated in the joint. Once the protein known as NF-KB
is activated, it binds to genes and increases the production of
inflammatory proteins, which attack the joints. Dr Janet Funk and
her colleagues believe their findings also suggest turmeric
extract could treat other inflammatory disorders, including
asthma, multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease. The
extract also blocked a pathway in the body linked to bone loss,
suggesting it could treat osteoporosis as well. Future work
Professor Robert Moots, professor of rheumatology at Liverpool
University and spokesman for the Arthritis Research Campaign, said
people with arthritis will have to wait to see if the study
results in new treatments. "It will come as no surprise if
naturally occurring compounds have a drug-like effect," he
said. "I do not think there is any evidence that countries
that eat a lot of turmeric have a lower frequency of rheumatoid
arthritis. So simply eating more spices is not likely to be
effective clinically. "What is more likely is these results
will lead to the targeted development of new compounds." Dr
Anne Barton, senior lecturer and honorary consultant
rheumatologist at the University of Manchester said: "The
findings are interesting but should be interpreted with some
caution at this stage. "Results of tests in animal models of
arthritis are not always reproduced in human rheumatoid arthritis.
"As the authors point out though, there are a number of
successful drug therapies that have been developed from
plants."

|
| 46 |
UK probes benefits of body scans Do scanners do more
harm than good? The UK has said it will look at the benefits and
risks of CT body scans, amid fears about the effects of exposing
patients to radiation. The Department of Health has asked
the Committee on the Medical Aspects of Radiation to assess the
subject. An increasing number of healthy people are using CT
scans, which give an inside-out view of the body, as a way of
detecting early signs of disease. However, some CT scans
emit radiation beyond normal X-ray levels. CT scanning refers to a
procedure that is also known as computerised or computed
tomography, whereby a three-dimensional view of the body is
constructed from a series of cross-sectional x-ray images.
Fear factor A Department of Health (DoH) spokeswoman said that the
government asked the committee "to look at the benefits and
risks of using CT scanning in preventative healthcare".
"DoH regulates medical exposures to ionising radiation,
such as x-rays or CT scans, to ensure that the long-term benefits
to the individual outweigh possible risks associated with
radiation," she explained. The subject of body
scanning in order to find early signs of disease has divided
medical opinion, with some doctors saying it saves lives and
others saying it is an expensive waste of money. Despite the
controversy, more and more people are turning to health screening
and body scanning as a way of checking up on their bodies, in the
hope of catching illnesses such as cancer in the early
stages. Health company Bupa, one of a number of firms
that offers the tests, says it expects demand to keep increasing.
In a report last year, the British Medical Association
warned that scans could cause unnecessary anxiety.

|
| 47 |
Alzheimer mice memories restored The memory of mice
suffering from Alzheimer's disease has been restored, a study
shows. US scientists increased the activity of an enzyme called
Uch-L1 which is involved in memory function. They then tested the
mice and found that they had regained the ability to form new
memories. Writing in the journal Cell, the team said the work was
in its early stages, but could help the development of therapies
for the debilitating disease. We injected the mice with this
enzyme, and we found we were restoring their memories Dr Ottavio
Arancio The scientists used transgenic mice that had Alzheimer's
disease. Like humans with the condition, the mice had plaques of
protein amyloid beta in their brain and damaged synapses (the site
where brain cells communicate with each other), and they also
suffered from memory loss. The researchers injected the mice with
a substance which boosted levels of the enzyme Uch-L1. They then
tested the mice's memory by putting them into a cage where they
were exposed to a very mild shock from the cage floor. Mice with
normal memories stay still when they are placed in the cage for a
second time, to avoid the shock, whereas mice with Alzheimer's do
not because they cannot remember their first visit. The
researchers found that when they placed the mice with boosted
Uch-L1 levels into the cage, they stayed still like the normal
mice. Dr Ottavio Arancio, an author on the paper from Columbia
University's Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease
and Aging, said: "We injected the mice with this enzyme, and
we found we were restoring their memories." He said further
investigation revealed the enzyme also seemed to repair the
synapse function of the mice. Possible therapies Michael Shelanski,
another author on the paper from Columbia University, said:
"While amyloid beta is certainly a key player in Alzheimer's
disease - and efforts to reduce it remain a worthy goal - our
results show that, even in the presence of the plaque, damage to
memory can be reversed." The authors propose that the enzyme
could be targeted to look for new therapies for Alzheimer's
disease; however they cautioned that the research is in its early
stages. Dr Shelanski said: "While this discovery is very
promising, its proven effectiveness is limited to animal models
and it will take some time before it could lead to therapies in
humans. "We continue to work towards that crucial goal."
In an accompanying commentary, Peter Lansbury, a neurobiologist
from Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, said:
"Understanding the molecular mechanism of memory is one of
the most compelling and complex challenges for the next generation
of scientists. "[The researchers] identify a protein that may
be involved in both normal memory function and the type of memory
loss characteristic of early Alzheimer's disease." Harriet
Millward, deputy chief executive of the Alzheimer's Research
Trust, said: "This is a very encouraging piece of research
that could potentially open up a new front in the battle against
Alzheimer's disease. "It is fair to say though, that at this
stage a cure is still a long way off. More research is needed to
see if this result could eventually be extrapolated from mice to
men." Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/5279432.stm
Published: 2006/08/25 23:00:42 GMT © BBC MMVI

|
| 48 |
Herbal medicines and
nutritional supplements can cause significant ocular side effects
About: Herbal medicines and nutritional supplements can cause
significant ocular side effects Date: 13 October 2004 Source:
News-Medical Medical News Summary (summary of medical news story
as reported by News-Medical): Concern is being raised over the
fact that up to 42% of people use herbal medicines or nutritional
supplements and their doctors don’t know what adverse reactions
they can cause. Some side effects are dry eye, retinal hemorrhage
and transient visual loss. Permanent damage can occur if the
product causing the symptom continues to be used. Some products
associated with ocular side effects are: ginkgo biloba, Echinacea
purpurea, chamomile, licorice, canthaxanthine, Datura, niacin and
Vitamin A. URL: http://www.news-medical.net/?id=5569

|
| 49 |
How to stop rosacea with an inexpensive
supplement
Today, I've got great news for rosacea sufferers. We now know that
a cheap mineral can reduce the symptoms of this irritating skin
condition.
Rosacea is a dermatitis that affects people over the age of 50.
It's characterized by redness, scaling and inflammation in the
central part of the face. I've found that many cases of rosacea
will clear simply by addressing a lack of stomach acidity. If you
have little stomach acid, digestion in incomplete and skin
problems can result. Simply taking digestive acid such as betaine
hydrochloride may provide relief.
But a lack of stomach acid also leads to mineral deficiency, since
acid is required to absorb minerals. Researchers proved this in a
small (19 patients), but randomized and controlled study. They
followed 11 women and eight men, who had suffered with the disease
for an average of 4.4 years.
The researchers gave one group 100 mg of zinc sulfate three times
daily for three months. Another group received a placebo. Then
they gave the placebo group the zinc sulfate and the other group
the placebo for the same amount of time. This crossover is the
best way to conduct a study. The results showed that zinc indeed
reduced activity. And not just a little bit - the effect was
significant. And the activity began to rise when the researchers
gave the placebo.
The only significant side effect of the zinc was mild gastric
discomfort in 12% of the participants. Otherwise, each of the
volunteers found significant relief from their rosacea symptoms
when they took the zinc.
If you have rosacea, this is a safe, simple, and inexpensive way
to treat it. Zinc is dirt cheap, especially as zinc sulfate. High
doses of zinc can suppress copper absorption, so I would be sure
to add copper (two mg per day).
Too much zinc also can cause other problems, such as a metallic,
bitter taste in your mouth, stomach pain, nausea, vomiting,
cramps, and diarrhea mixed with blood. This would be quite rare at
the doses used. But once you see improvement, it's still wise to
cut the zinc to the lowest dose necessary to maintain improvement.
Also consider digestive acid as betaine hydrochloride, which might
help with the absorption of all minerals.
Yours for better health and medical freedom,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
Ref: "Oral zinc sulfate in the treatment of rosacea: a
double-blind, placebo-controlled study," Sharquie KE, Najim
RA, et al, Int J Dermatol, 2006; 45(7): 857-61.

|
| 50 |
The best way to remove deadly chemicals from
your body
Toxins are everywhere. One of the most common is dioxin, which is
one of the most insidious cancer-inducers we've found. This
notorious chemical poisoned many of our GIs during the Vietnam
War. I treated many of these GIs. And dioxin was particularly
difficult to treat. You've got to unload the chemicals. These
hydrocarbons melt into your fat. So they can be hard to get rid
of. But I had a secret weapon that really helps with these
difficult cases.
It's called chlorella. I've used this blue-green algae as a
detoxifying agent for years. And there are times when it can work
miracles. Now science if finally catching up.
A Japanese study on pregnant women found that taking chlorella
while pregnant reduces the amount of dioxin in their breast milk
by 30%. Breast milk is loaded with fat, so you would expect it to
carry fat-soluble poisons as well. Many DDT-exposed women were
scared to nurse their babies for the same reason.
While you may not be pregnant or nursing, this study has huge
implications for you. All of us come into contact with thousands
of man-made chemicals throughout our life. Some of these, such as
dioxin, are deadly.
Chlorella is an easy way to remove any of these chemicals stored
in your body. It's one of the few supplements I take regularly. I
consider it more of a super food than a supplement. Not only does
it detoxify, but it is chock full of essential nutrients,
including all the essential amino acids and vitamin B12.
Sun Chlorella is an excellent choice and is readily available at
most health food stores. The one I like best is E-Lyte Chlorella
produced by rigid German organic standards. It's available at
800-896-1484.
If you'd like more information on chlorella, I'm planning to do a
major report on it in a future issue of my newsletter Second
Opinion. If you're not a subscriber, you can subscribe on my
website www.secondopinionnewsletter.com
Yours for better health and medical freedom,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
Ref: Nakano S, Noguchi T, Takekoshi H, Suzuki G, Nakano M.;
Saiseikai Nara Hospital, 4-chome, 8-jyo, Nara, Nara 630-8145,
Japan.

|
| 51 |
Cocoa Polyphenols Support Healthy Blood Sugar
Levels According to New Study
Dietary Supplementation with Cacao (Cocoa) reduced blood
glucose levels in obese diabetic mice, may support and promote
Healthy Blood Sugar levels and offer other significant benefits
for Humans, according to a new study from Japan.
"Dietary Supplementation with CLP (Cacao
Proanthocyanidins) can dependently prevent the development of
hyperglycemia in diabetic obese mice," wrote lead author
Makoto Tomaru in the Journal of Nutrition. "The
dietary intake of food or drinks produced from Cocoa Beans might
be beneficial in preventing the onset of type -2 mellitus."
The potential health benefits of cocoa have been gaining
increased interest, with studies reporting that flavonoid - rich
Dark Chocolate may reduce the risk of Cardiovascular disease.
However, according to Tomaru and co-workers, this is the first
study to report that CLP (Cocoa) may prevent aggravation of type -
2 diabetes mellitus.

|
| 52 |
Beef diet 'damages sons' sperm'
Scientists have produced evidence to suggest that Europe was
right to ban the beef industry from using growth promoters to
increase yield.
A US study has linked use of the chemicals to damage to human
sperm.
The University of Rochester found men whose mothers ate a lot
of beef during pregnancy had lower sperm counts.
The Human Reproduction study found they were three times more
likely to have a sperm count so low they could be classified as
sub-fertile.
|
It confirms that Europe was justified to ban the use of
these hormones when they did
Dr Allan Pacey
University of Sheffield |
The use of growth promoting chemicals was banned in Europe in
1988.
But although the US banned the use of some growth promoters in
1979, others, such as the sex hormones testosterone and
progesterone, are still in use in the beef industry.
The Rochester team examined sperm counts among US men born
between 1949 and 1983.
They found those whose mothers ate more than seven beef meals a
week had an average sperm concentration of 43.1 million sperm per
millilitre of seminal fluid.
In contrast, the sons of mothers who ate less beef had an
average of 56.9 million sperm.
Fertility threshold
|
GROWTH PROMOTERS
Six growth promoters are legally in use in the US:
Natural steroids:
estradiol
testosterone
progesterone
Synthetic hormones:
zeranol
trenbolene acetate
melengestrol acetate |
Among sons of mothers who ate a lot of beef, 17.7% had a sperm
concentration below the World Health Organization sub-fertility
threshold of 20 million sperm per millilitre of seminal fluid. The
figure for the sons of lower beef consumers was 5.7%.
Lead researcher Professor Shanna Swan said the findings
suggested that exposure to growth promoters contained in the beef
eaten by the boys' mothers was to blame.
However, she admitted the research team had no specific data on
which chemicals the meat contained, and conceded other possible
causes, such as exposure to pesticides, or lifestyle factors could
not be ruled out.
She said: "Theoretically, the foetus and young children
are particularly sensitive to exposure to sex steroids.
"Therefore, the consumption of residues of steroids in
meat by pregnant women and young children is of particular
concern."
Professor Swan said to pin down the role of growth promoters
the study would have to be repeated in men born in Europe after
1988.
Damaging effects
|
EU POSITION
Hormonal growth promoters banned in EU in 1988
UK government runs a system of surveillance for residues
of such substances in UK cattle to monitor compliance with
the ban
EU law bans meat from hormonally treated animals being
exported to the EU by non-member countries |
Dr Allan Pacey, senior lecturer in andrology at the University
of Sheffield, said: "Even though males don't start producing
sperm until puberty, it is during the time in their mother's womb,
and in the early years of their life as an infant, that the
testicles develop their capacity to produce sperm.
"Scientists have been concerned for a number of years that
oestrogen mimicking chemicals in water supplies, plastics or
make-up can affect the critical stages in the development of young
boys' testicles.
"In extreme cases of exposure, this could lead to sperm
counts in adult men that are low enough to be the cause of
infertility
"That hormones given to cattle might have lowered the
sperm counts of adult men because their mothers ate a lot of beef
when they were pregnant with them is alarming to say the least.
"But it confirms that Europe was justified to ban the use
of these hormones when they did."
Professor Alastair Hay, an expert on environmental toxicology
at the University of Leeds, said one weakness of the study was
that it relied on women being able accurately to recall how much
beef they had eaten during pregnancy - something which may have
happened many years earlier.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/6496977.stm
Published: 2007/03/27 23:10:27 GMT
© BBC MMVII

|
| 53 |
Heavy mobile use 'damages sperm'
Heavy use of mobile phones may damage men's fertility, a study
has suggested.
Researchers found those men who used a phone for four hours or
more a day had fewer sperm and those they had moved less well and
were of poorer quality.
The Ohio study involving 364 men was presented to the American
Society for Reproductive Medicine in New Orleans.
But a UK expert said it was unlikely the phones were to blame,
as they were in use and not near the testes, and it may be being
sedentary was the cause.
|
If you are holding [the phone] up to your head to
speak a lot, it makes no sense that it is having a
direct effect on your testes
Dr Allan Pacey, British Fertility Society
|
The team from the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Ohio tested
the sperm of 364 men who were being treated at fertility clinics
in Mumbai, India, with their partners.
It was found that the heaviest users, those who used their
phones for more than four hours a day had the lowest average
sperm counts, at 50 million per millilitre (ml) and the least
healthy sperm.
Men who used their phones for between two and four hours a
day averaged sperm counts of 69 million per ml and had
moderately healthy sperm.
Those who said they did not use mobile phones at all had the
highest average sperm counts, of 86 million per ml, and their
sperm was of the highest quality seen.
'Used without thinking twice'
Dr Ashok Agarwal, who led the research, told the New Orleans
conference the study did not prove mobiles damaged fertility,
but said it showed more research was warranted.
"There was a significant decrease in the most important
measures of sperm health and that should definitely be reflected
in a decrease in fertility, which is seen worldwide.
"People use mobile phones without thinking twice what
the consequences might be.
"It is just like using a toothbrush, but mobiles could
be having a devastating effect on fertility.
"It still has to be proved, but it could be having a
huge impact because mobiles are so much part of lives."
He suggested radiation from mobile phones might harm sperm by
damaging DNA, affecting the cells in the testes which produce
testosterone or the tubes where sperm is produced.
But a British expert cast doubt on the suggested link between
mobile phone use and infertility in the men studied.
Dr Allan Pacey, senior lecturer in andrology at the
University of Sheffield, said: "This is a good study, but I
don't think it tackles the issue.
"If you're using your phone for four hours a day,
presumably it is out of your pocket for longer.
"That raises a big question: how is it that testicular
damage is supposed to occur?"
Dr Pacey, who is honorary secretary of the British Fertility
Society, added: "If you are holding it up to your head to
speak a lot, it makes no sense that it is having a direct effect
on your testes."
He added that people who use phones for longer might be more
sedentary, more stressed or eat more junk food, which might be
more likely explanations for the link found in the study.
|
| 54 |
Low-fat dairy infertility warning
A diet rich on low-fat dairy food may make it harder for some
women to conceive, according to a study involving thousands of US
women.
Harvard researchers found women who frequently ate these foods
were 85% more likely to have ovulation problems.
In contrast, the Human Reproduction study found eating full-fat
dairy foods, including ice cream, cut the risk of this type of
infertility.
However, UK experts insist there is scant evidence of a link.
The research used a database of 116,000 US nurses which is
regularly updated with information about their lifestyle, diet
and health.
|
I'm not convinced that there is any reason for women
who are trying to conceive to alter their diet, unless
they are obese
Dr Richard Fleming
Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine
|
They were asked whether they had been trying, and failing, to
conceive, and whether a diagnosis of 'ovulatory failure' -
infertility due to irregularity in the normal monthly cycle -
had been made.
Over an eight year period between 1991 and 1999, 438 women
reported this set of circumstances, and their answers to
questions about their diet were analysed.
If the women ate two or more portions of low-fat dairy
produce a week, the risk of infertility due to ovulatory failure
appeared to be 85% higher.
When women eating two or more portions of full-fat dairy
produce such as whole milk or ice cream were compared with those
eating one or fewer, they had a 27% lower risk of infertility
due to lack of ovulation.
Food swap
Dr Jorge Chavarro, who led the project, said that the link
needed further investigation.
He said that women trying to conceive should think about
their diet: "They should consider changing low-fat dairy
foods for high-fat dairy foods; for instance, by swapping
skimmed milk for whole milk and eating ice cream, not low fat
yoghurt."
He believes the key may be that there is a substance vital
for healthy ovarian function that requires the presence of fat
for it to be properly absorbed into the body.
However, other scientists say that the only compelling
evidence of a link between diet and infertility involves
obesity, which is linked to a significant reduction in the
chances of conception.
Dr Richard Fleming, from the Glasgow Centre for Human
Reproduction, pointed out that women reporting a low-fat
'healthy' diet might be those already aware of fertility issues
and trying to improve their chances.
He said: "Women with ovulatory failure make up a
relatively small proportion of cases of female infertility.
"I'm not convinced that there is any reason for women
who are trying to conceive to alter their diet unless they are
obese, and I would not advise any woman to do this."
|
| 55 |
Overly Anxious And Driven People Prone To Irritable
Bowel Syndrome
28 Feb 2007
Overly anxious and driven people are susceptible to
irritable bowel syndrome, usually known as IBS, indicates
research published ahead of print in the journal Gut.
The researchers studied 620 people who had confirmed
gastroenteritis caused by a bacterial infection. None had
had IBS before, or indeed any serious bowel disorder.
Each participant completed a detailed questionnaire when
their infection was confirmed. This included questions about
mood, perceived stress levels, perfectionism and illness
beliefs and behaviours.
They were then monitored three and six months later to see
whether they had developed the typical symptoms of IBS,
which include diarrhoea and/or constipation, abdominal pain
and bloating.
In all, 49 people had IBS at both time points. Women were
more than twice as likely to have IBS as the men.
Those with IBS were significantly more likely to have
reported high levels of stress and anxiety and psychosomatic
symptoms than those who did not develop the condition
They were also significantly more likely to be
"driven," carrying on regardless until they were
forced to rest - a pattern of behaviour which only worsens
and prolongs the condition, say the authors.
Although not likely to be depressed, those with IBS were
more likely to take a pessimistic view of illness.
IBS affects between 10 and 15% of adults in industrialised
countries, but its exact cause is unknown.
"Gastroenteritis may trigger the symptoms, but
cognitions, behaviour and emotions may help to prolong and
maintain them over time," conclude the authors, who
suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy may be an
effective treatment.
Contact: Emma Dickinson
BMJ-British Medical Journal
Article URL:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=63861

|
|
| 56 |
The Dangers of Meat
A summary of the PBS special called:
"Modern Meat: A PBS Frontline
Documentary"
Aired Thursday, April 18, at 9pm, 60 minutes
It's as American as apple pie and vastly more popular. The
hamburger has become our national food: Americans eat more meat
than any other people in the world, with the average person
devouring three hamburgers a week. And with more meat available
than ever before, today's beef costs 30 percent less than it did
in 1970, making it that much more attractive to consumers looking
for a quick, cheap meal.
Yet despite new federal safety regulations, more than 100
million pounds of meat has been recalled since 1998 due to
suspected bacterial contamination. And just last summer, the
nation's largest meat processor had to recall 500,000 pounds of
beef contaminated with e.coli bacteria from seventeen states.
How much does the average American know about the beef they're
eating? Have dramatic changes in the U.S. meat industry
compromised the overall safety of American beef? And are the new
federal regulations enough to guarantee the safety of the meat we
eat?
FRONTLINE explores these and other questions in "Modern
Meat," airing Thursday, April 18, at 9 P.M. on PBS. Through
interviews with current and former U.S. Department of Agriculture
officials, meat inspectors, food safety experts, and industry
representatives, the one-hour documentary reveals how today's
highly-industrialized meat business has fundamentally changed the
composition of the typical American burger, causing some to fear
the spread of serious -- and even deadly -- bacteria. The program
also explores the powerful U.S. meat industry's attempts to resist
certain government regulations aimed at preventing contaminated
meat from ending up in supermarkets and fast food chains across
America.
"I think what the [meat] industry is saying is that they
don't want to be accountable for the product that they're
selling," says Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation, an
expose of the meat and fast food industry. "This industry has
fought against food safety inspection for a hundred years."
"Modern Meat" takes viewers inside the U.S. meat
industry, beginning at the cattle ranch and then moving on to the
"feedlot" -- a huge industrial holding pen where as many
as 100,000 cattle are held together until they are fat enough to
be slaughtered. Then the carcasses make their way down a
Detroit-style assembly line or "dis-assembly line," as
one industry insider quips -- where modern advances have enabled
some meat companies to strip as many as 400 carcasses an hour --
nearly three times as many as in 1970.
But such modern efficiency may pose potential health risks.
In "Modern Meat," FRONTLINE speaks with numerous
scientists and industry observers who raise serious concerns about
today's meat production system. With large numbers of animals
being raised together in huge feedlots covered with feces, they
say, it's easy for bacteria to spread from one animal to another.
"Cows tend to produce feces [and] feces is primarily
bacteria," says Glen Morris, a microbiologist at the
University of Maryland and a former USDA official "When those
bacteria are spread around, there's ample opportunity for bacteria
to be spread from one cow to the next.
"In the larger feedlots," he adds, "there's a
greater chance for the passage of microorganisms back and forth.
All of that contributes to the spread of microorganisms like e.
coli."
Dr. Robert Tauxe is also concerned. "The new highly
industrialized way we produce meat has opened up new ecological
homes for a number of bacteria," says Tauxe, head of the
Centers for Disease Control's Foodborne Illness Section.
Gone are the days, Tauxe says, when a hamburger patty contained
the meat from a single cow; with enormous numbers of cattle now
being herded, fattened, slaughtered, and ground up together, it's
virtually impossible to determine how many cows contribute to a
single burger.
"If we take meat from a thousand different animals and
grind that together," he says, "we're pooling bacteria
from a thousand different animals as well."
What's more, there is increasing evidence that the modern meat
industry's widespread use of antibiotics to promote growth and
keep livestock healthy may result in the development of bacteria
strains that are resistant to antibiotic treatment.
The consequences of bacterial contamination can be deadly. In
1993, Jack in the Box hamburgers contaminated with a deadly strain
of e. coli killed four children and injured 750, causing the
government to seek a more scientific system for inspecting meat.
For decades, industry experts say, meat inspectors had
practiced the "poke and sniff" method of visually
inspecting carcasses for signs of disease. Following the Jack in
the Box outbreak, the government proposed implementing a new
inspection system -- known as "HACCP" (Hazard Analysis
and Critical Control Points) -- that would require microbial
testing to detect the presence of invisible -- yet harmful --
bacteria such as e. coli and salmonella.
The proposed testing for salmonella, however, was not embraced
by the meat industry. In "Modern Meat," FRONTLINE speaks
with industry insiders and government officials who say the
powerful U.S. food lobby -- which has contributed heavily to key
Capitol Hill lawmakers -- aggressively fought including this
testing as part of the new regulations.
It's a charge that the American Meat Institute's J. Patrick
Boyle denies. "It's not the beef industry that's fighting
standards that are meaningful, that improve the wholesomeness of
the product," Boyle tells FRONTLINE. "The beef industry
has reservations about unscientific standards that have no
relation to the safety of our products."
The USDA resisted industry pressure, and in 1996 the U.S. meat
industry began making the transition to the new inspection system.
Since then, the USDA has reported a marked drop in salmonella
contamination of ground beef, while the CDC has also begun to see
a drop in some food borne illnesses. Yet the American consumer
still faces serious risks.
Each year, the CDC tracks numerous cases of food poisoning,
while the USDA maintains a running list of tainted meat recalls.
The growth in global trade, meanwhile, has increased the risk of
diseased cattle or beef coming into the country and decimating the
U.S. livestock population. Last year, for example, USDA Inspector
General Roger Viadero discovered that 650,000 pounds of foreign
meat from a country embargoed because of foot and mouth disease
found its way into America's heartland.
In addition, a recent court ruling threatens to limit the
government's enforcement of its new food safety regulations. In
"Modern Meat," FRONTLINE examines a lawsuit filed by
Texas meat grinding company Supreme Beef against the U.S.
Department of Agriculture. When the USDA effectively shut down the
company after it failed bacterial contamination tests three times
-- once after nearly 50 percent of its meat was found to be
contaminated with salmonella -- the company sued. Supported in its
lawsuit by the National Meat Association, Supreme Beef charged
that the government didn't have the right to shut down its
operations simply because it failed to meet the USDA salmonella
standards. Last month, a federal appeals court ruled in favor of
the meat industry, prompting concern from some industry observers.
Carol Tucker Foreman, head of food safety at the Consumer
Federation of America and a former USDA official, believes the
modern meat production and distribution system leaves consumers
vulnerable to a widespread outbreak of bacterial contamination.
She points to a case in which sixteen deaths and five stillbirths
were connected to Ball Park Franks found to be contaminated with
deadly listeria.
"Those hot dogs were shipped everywhere," Foreman
says. "And thousands and thousands of them were made every
day. So the potential for one mistake rippling out and causing
thousands of deaths is there."
Following the broadcast, visit FRONTLINE's Web site at
www.pbs.org/frontline for more on this report, including:
Statistics and articles on the industrialization of the U.S.
meat industry; Background reports from inside the slaughterhouse,
readings and interviews on current conditions, and the movement
for humane slaughter; Facts and advice for the consumer about
choosing meat and eating safely; Extended interviews, chronologies
and a video report. "Modern Meat" is a FRONTLINE
co-production with Cam Bay Productions. The producer and writer is
Doug Hamilton. The co-producer is Steve Johnson. The senior
producer for FRONTLINE is Sharon Tiller.
FRONTLINE is produced by WGBH Boston and is broadcast
nationwide on PBS.

|
| 57 |
Too much of this healthy fat increases your risk of cancer
I've told you in the past that eating the wrong fat can make
prostate cancer grow twice as fast. But now there's evidence that
reducing how much of this fat you eat now will lower your risk of
ever getting the disease. And I've got an even easier way to help
you reduce your risk, which I'll tell you about in just a moment.
First, an article published in the Journal of Urology has further
linked prostate cancer to too many omega-6 fatty acids. The
researchers conducted this study in Jamaica, a country with the
highest incidence of prostate cancer in the world. The researchers
biopsied the patients to prove cancer's presence. They then did a
fatty acid analysis of their blood cells. The researchers found
that all of the prostate cancer patients had way too many omega-6s
in their blood.
Omega-6 fatty acids are essential for life. The trouble is, most
of us get way too many. And here's one area where you can easily
get way too much of a good thing. I've been to Jamaica. Most of
the population eats a lot of fried foods - a primary source of
omega-6 fatty acids.
The ideal ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids in your diet is
4:1. Most people have at least 12:1. That's way too many omega-6s,
which means most men have an increased risk of prostate cancer. No
wonder the disease is becoming epidemic.
You really don't need a lot of oils in your diet. I like salad
dressing as much as you do. So, when you do eat oil, make sure
it's a high quality oil, such as olive oil or sesame oil (these
are great for salads). There is NO place for common vegetable
oils, such as Wesson or Canola oils, anywhere in your diet.
If you must cook with oil (cooking is the worst for oil), use
coconut, macadamia nut, sesame, or olive oils, and keep the
temperature as low as possible. I believe that you can get all the
omega-3 you need from a diet rich in living foods. I would bet
that the high rate of prostate cancer in Jamaica is not just
omega-6, but an overall terrible deterioration in their diet.
I also recommend you take a high-quality omega-3 essential fatty
acid supplement. I think Yes! EFA is on of the best on the market.
You can order it by calling 800-728-2288.
Yours for better health and medical freedom,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
Ref: J Urol, 2007; 177(1): 97-101.

|
| 58 |
Fat hormone 'boosts colon cancer'
A chemical produced by fat cells makes colon cancers grow
faster, a US study has suggested.
The British Journal of Surgery study could help explain why
severely overweight people appear to be at far greater risk of the
disease.
A team at the University of California, San Diego found that
the hormone leptin triggered increased growth in human colon
cancer cells.
Obese people are up to three times more likely to develop
colorectal cancer.
Other researchers have already found that some colon cancer
cells appear to be set up to respond to leptin, with
"receptors" for the chemical on their surfaces.
|
These results may explain why obesity increases a
person's risk of colonic cancer
Dr Kim Barrett
University of California, San Diego |
The more fat cells a person has, the more leptin will be in
their bloodstream.
The San Diego team wanted to find further evidence of the link
by watching what happened to human cancer cells exposed to the
hormone.
In a laboratory, they added the hormone to different varieties
of cancer cell.
Growth was stimulated in all the cell lines - and in two out of
three tested, the hormone also hampered the usual process of
programmed death that allows the body to replace normal cells, but
which often malfunctions in cancers.
Dr Kim Barrett, who led the research, said: "These results
may explain why obesity increases a person's risk of colonic
cancer.
"The fact we have shown how leptin stimulates these cells
means that drug companies may be in a better position to develop
new treatments against the disease."
Obesity increasing
In the UK it is currently estimated that one in five men and a
quarter of women are obese, with as many as 30,000 people a year
dying prematurely from obesity-related conditions, including
cancers.
Britain now has the most obese population in Europe.
A study published this week suggested that severely obese men
doubled their risk of dying from prostate cancer, and obesity is
also believed to increase the chance of developing breast cancer.
|
Body Mass Index
Underweight: less than 20
Normal weight: 20-25
Overweight: 25 - 29.9
Obese: over 30
Morbidly obese: over 40
|
Professor Alan Clarke said: "This research builds on
previous work suggesting that leptin, a hormone released from fat
cells, may play a role in the link between obesity and cancer.
"The researchers have shown that leptin is involved in two
molecular pathways known to play a role in bowel cancer
development."
"Although at an early stage, the findings shed light both
on the development of bowel cancer and the link between obesity
and cancer."
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/health/6529677.stm
Published: 2007/04/07 23:03:40 GMT
© BBC MMVII
|
| 59 |
SWEET BUT POISON--Aspartame--stop using it!
SWEET BUT POISON - A MUST
READ
In October of 2001, my sister started getting very sick. She
had stomach spasms and she was having a hard time getting
around. Walking was a major chore. It took everything she
had just to get out of bed; she was in so much pain.
By March 2002, she had undergone several tissue and muscle
biopsies and was on 24 various prescription medications. The doctors could
not determine what was wrong with her. She was in so much pain, and so sick.
she just knew she was dying. She put her house, bank accounts, life insurance,
etc., in her oldest daughters name, and made sure that her younger
children were to be taken care of. She also wanted her last hooray, so she
planned a trip to Florida (basically in a wheelchair) for March 22nd.
On March 19th I called her to ask how her most recent tests
went, and she said they didn't find anything on the test, but they believe
she had MS. I recalled an article a friend of mine e-mailed to me and I
asked my sister if she drank diet soda? She told me that she did. As a matter
of fact, she was getting ready to crack one open that moment. I told her not
to open it, and to stop drinking the diet soda !!! I e-mailed her the
article my friend, a lawyer, had sent.
My sister called me within 32 hours after our phone
conversation and told me she had stopped drinking the diet soda AND she could
walk!!!! The muscle spasms went away. She said she didn't feel 100% but she sure
felt a lot better. She told me she was going to her doctor with this
article and would call me when she got home. Well, she called me, and said her
doctor was amazed! He is going to call all of his MS patients to find
out if they consumed artificial sweeteners of any kind.
In a nutshell, she was being poisoned by the Aspartame in
the diet soda... and literally dying a slow and miserable death. When she got
to Florida March 22nd, all she had to take was one pill, and that was a
pill for the Aspartame poisoning! She is well on her way to a complete
recovery. And she is walking!!! No wheelchair!!! This article saved
her life.
If it says 'SUGAR FREE' on the label; DO NOT EVEN THINK
ABOUT IT!!!
I have spent several days lecturing at the WORLD
ENVIRONMENTAL CONFERENCE on "ASPARTAME," marketed as
'NutraSweet,' 'Equal,' and 'Spoonful.' In the keynote address by the EPA, it was announced that in the
United States in 2001 there is an epidemic of multiple sclerosis and systemic
lupus. It was difficult to determine exactly what toxin was causing this
to be rampant. I stood up and said that I was there to lecture on exactly
that subject.
I will explain why Aspartame is so dangerous: When the
temperature of this sweetener exceeds 86 degrees F, the wood alcohol in
ASPARTAME converts to formaldehyde and then to formic acid, which in turn causes
metabolic acidosis. Formic acid is the poison found in the
sting of fire ants. The methanol toxicity mimics, among
other conditions, multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus.
Many people were being diagnosed in error. Although multiple
sclerosis is not a death sentence, Methanol toxicity is!
Systemic lupus has become almost as rampant as multiple
sclerosis, especially with Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi
drinkers. The victim usually does not know that the
Aspartame is the culprit. He or she continues its use;
irritating the lupus to such a degree that it may become a
life-threatening condition. We have seen patients with
systemic lupus become asymptotic, once taken off diet sodas.
In cases of those diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis, most of
the symptoms disappear.
We've seen many cases where vision loss returned and hearing
loss improved markedly. This also applies to cases of
tinnitus and fibro myalgia.
During a lecture, I said, "If you are using ASPARTAME
(NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc) and you suffer from fibro
myalgia symptoms, spasms, shooting,pains, numbness in your
legs, cramps, vertigo, dizziness, headaches, tinnitus, joint
pain, unexplainable depression, anxiety attacks, slurred
speech, blurred vision, or memory loss.you probably have
ASPARTAME poisoning!" People were jumping up during the
lecture saying, "I have some of these symptoms."Is it reversible?"
Yes! Yes! Yes! STOP drinking diet sodas and be alert for
Aspartame on food labels! Many products are fortified with
it!!!
This is a serious problem. Dr. Espart (one of my speakers)
remarked that so many people seem to be symptomatic for MS
and during his recent visit to a hospice; a nurse stated
that six of her friends, who were heavy Diet Coke addicts,
had all been diagnosed with MS. This is beyond coincidence!
Diet soda is NOT a diet product! It is a chemically altered,
multiple SODIUM (salt) and ASPARTAME containing product that
actually makes you crave carbohydrates. It is far more
likely to make you GAIN weight! These products also contain
formaldehyde, which stores in the fat cells, particularly in
the hips and thighs. Formaldehyde is an absolute toxin and
is used primarily to preserve "tissue specimens"
Many products we use every day contain this chemical but we
SHOULD NOT store it IN our body!!!
Dr. H. J. Roberts stated in his lectures that once free of
the "diet products" and with no significant
increase in exercise; his patients lost an average of 19
pounds over a trial period.
Aspartame is especially dangerous for diabetics. We found
that some physicians, who believed that they had a patient
with retinopathy, in fact, had symptoms caused by Aspartame.
The Aspartame drives the blood sugar out of control. Thus
diabetics may suffer acute memory loss due to the fact that
aspartic acid and phenylalanine are NEUROTOXIC when taken
without the other amino acids necessary for a good balance.
Treating diabetes is all about BALANCE. Especially with
diabetics, the Aspartame passes the blood/brain barrier and
it then deteriorates the neurons of the brain; causing
various
levels of brain damage, seizures, depression, manic
depression, panic attacks, uncontrollable anger and rage.
Consumption of Aspartame causes these same symptoms in
non-diabetics as well. Documentation and observation also
reveal that thousands of children diagnosed with ADD and
ADHD have had complete turnarounds in their behavior when
these chemicals have been removed from their diet. So called
"behavior modification prescription drugs"
(Ritalin and others) are no longer needed. Truth be told,
they were never NEEDED in the first place! Most of these
children were being "poisoned" on a daily basis
with the very foods that were "better for them than
sugar."
It is also suspected that the Aspartame in thousands of
pallets of diet Coke and diet Pepsi consumed by men and
women fighting in the Gulf War, may be partially to blame
for the well-known Gulf War Syndrome.
Dr. Roberts warns that it can cause birth defects, i.e.
mental retardation, if taken at the time of conception and
during early pregnancy. Children are especially at risk for
neurological disorders and should NEVER be given artificial
sweeteners. There are many different case histories to
relate of children suffering grand mal seizures and other
neurological disturbances due to the use of NutraSweet.
Unfortunately, it is not always easy to convince people that
Aspartame is to blame for their child's illness.
Stevia,
which is a sweet herb, NOT A MANUFACTURED ADDITIVE, helps in
the metabolism of sugar, which would be ideal for diabetics.
It has now been approved as a dietary supplement by the FDA.
It is known that for many years the FDA outlawed this true
sweet food," due to their loyalty to MONSANTO Chemical
Company."
Books on this subject are available:
EXCITOTOXINS: THE TASTE THAT KILLS written by Dr. Russell
Blayblock
(Health Press 1-800-643-2665) AND: DEFENSE AGAINST
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE-
written by DR H. J. Roberts,
also a diabetic specialist.
These two doctors will soon be posting a position paper with
case histories on the deadly effects of Aspartame on the
Internet. According to the Conference of the American
College of Physicians, "We are talking about a plague
of neurological diseases directly caused by the use of this
deadly poison."
Herein lies the problem: There were Congressional Hearings
when Aspartame was included 100 different products and
strong objection was made concerning it's use. Since this
initial hearing, there have been two subsequent hearings and
still, nothing has been done. The drug and chemical lobbies
have very deep pockets. Sadly, MONSANTO'S patent on
Aspartame has EXPIRED!!
There are now over 5,000 products on the market that
contain this deadly chemical and there will be thousands
more introduced. Everybody wants a piece of the Aspartame
pie." I assure you that MONSANTO, the creator of
Aspartame, knows how deadly it is. And isn't it ironic that
MONSANTO funds, among others, the American Diabetes
Association, the American Dietetic Association and the
Conference of the American College of Physicians? This has
been recently exposed in the New York Times. These cannot
criticize any additives or convey their link to MONSANTO
because they take money from the food industry and are
required to endorse their products.
Senator Howard Metzenbaum wrote and presented a bill that
would require label warnings on products containing
Aspartame, especially regarding pregnant women, children and
infants. The bill would also institute independent studies
on the known dangers and the problems existing in the
general population regarding seizures, changes in brain
chemistry, neurological changes and behavioral symptoms. The
bill was killed.
It is known that the powerful drug and chemical lobbies are
responsible for this,
letting loose the hounds of disease and death on an
unsuspecting and uninformed public. Well, you're informed
now!!!! YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW!!!!
Please print this out and/or e-mail to your family and
friends. They have a right to know too.

|
| 60 |
- The Mass Poisoning
Of Humanity
An Exploration Of Human Stupidity
By Mike Adams
NewsTarget.com
11-27 -5
- The mass poisoning of humanity: an exploration of
human stupidity As human beings, we're the only species
stupid enough to actually poison ourselves. As part of
modern living, we create a wide variety of chemical
toxins that go into the ecosystem through rivers and
streams, the air, the soil and so on. Not only that, we
actually synthesize toxic chemicals and then inject them
directly into the food supply -- knowing full well that
they are poisonous and are major contributors to the
epidemic rates of chronic disease we are experiencing
today.
- What are these chemicals I'm talking about? Well, you're
about to get a whirlwind tour of humanity's toxic
chemicals. And if you look at toxic chemicals, you have to
start in the realm of dentistry, because in no other
profession (save medicine) will you find the use of so
many toxic chemicals that are deliberately prescribed to
patients or injected into their bodies. We're talking
about, of course, mercury fillings and fluoride dripped
into the public water supplies.
- Dr. Poison Mercury, DDS
- When we talk about mercury fillings, you have to keep in
mind that mercury is simply one of the most toxic
substances you can put into the human body, aside from
radioactive substances. Right now, today, dentists all
across the country and around the world are taking this
highly toxic metal and literally putting it into the teeth
of human beings. Those teeth are then used to chew food,
and as a person chews; they effectively grind away the
surfaces of these mercury fillings. These fillings release
gas mercury vapor and mercury particles, which people then
breathe into their lungs, or digest in their stomachs.
- Now, I can understand that maybe 50 years ago, the
dental industry was too ignorant to realize that it was
advocating this toxic metal and putting it into patients'
mouths. The industrial revolution is full of examples of
companies that used lots of toxic substances and
therapies, thinking they were good for you. Recall the
X-rays and radiation of the first half of the twentieth
century, people thought that radiation was great for you.
Manufacturers were equating radiation with energy and
thinking that if you consumed radiation pills, you would
be more energetic. These were actually sold and sponsored
by p hysicians and doctors, it was a mainstay of the
medical industry in those days.
- Later, we had the lead issue with industrial companies
like DuPont, which has an interesting history in the
manufacture and distribution of lead. People were
convinced lead was great for everything. They put it into
the gasoline, and leaded gasoline was born. We later found
out that lead causes nervous system disorders and that
it's very unhealthy to have lead emissions in the air. We
ended up getting rid of lead paint, and banning the use of
lead in foods and cosmetics.
- But for some reason, today dentists still think mercury
is perfectly good for you. It's like they're living in the
Dark Ages. Gee, why don't they have you swallow radiation
pills at the same time they're putting mercury fillings in
your mouth? That way you can be energized and have
fillings, too!
- Some of the greatest quackery in the world right now
takes place in dentists' offices; and dentists strongly
deny the problems associated with mercury toxicity and
mercury fillings. Of course, I don't mean all dentists,
some dentists are slowly coming around to this issue. In
fact, these selected dentists are leading the change; they
are pioneering dentists, just as those in the world of
medicine that are trying to change conventional medicine.
- These few dentists that are trying to make changes and
get mercury fillings banned deserve tremendous credit for
taking the lead and standing up and fighting against the
dogma of their own industry to protect their patients.
There's no doubt in my mind that within a few years,
mercury fillings will be banned and they will join the
ranks of lead paint, asbestos insulation, leaded gasoline
and radiation pills. They will go into the historical
annals of bad medicine, and some day future generations
will think we were absolutely crazy to be putting mercury
in people's mouths.
- More Poison From Dentists - Fluoride
- That's not the end of the toxicity in the world of
dentistry, we also h ave dentists pushing for, get this,
the dripping of a highly toxic chemical waste product into
the water supply... a substance that's scraped off the
smokestacks of industrial polluters. They want every
person in the community to actually drink this substance.
- This material is a toxic waste that's regulated by the
EPA. It would be illegal to drip it into a river or a
stream, but for some reason, it is perfectly legal to drip
it into the public water supply and let people drink it.
It's a bizarre cycle of rationalization that can only be
called medical lunacy. They no longer consider this toxic
substance toxic if it passes through the bodies of human
beings first. What substance am I talking about?
Fluorosilicic acid, otherwise known by its short name,
fluoride.
- Across the country and around the world, dentists are
insisting that we drip fluoride into the public water
supply. For what purpose? To protect the teeth? Can you be
serious? People are swallowing this liquid. They're not
rinsing it in their mouth and spitting it out, they're
ingesting it. Now as a result we have fluorosis, and bone
disorders that are related to the over-consumption of
fluoride.
- For some reason, dentists have decided that they now
have medical degrees, and that they want to medicate the
entire population with a drug, a biologically active drug,
without first diagnosing any individual in that community.
In other words, they want to medicate everyone across the
board with the exact same dosage, regardless of that
person's individual health needs, and regardless of how
much other fluoride they may be exposed to on a regular
basis. This is the insanity of the modern dentistry
community. Remember, these are the same people that want
to put mercury in your mouth, so it only makes sense that
they also want to poison your entire body by putting
fluorosilicic acid into the water supply.
- They don't call it fluorosilicic acid of course, because
that might scare people. They call it fluoride -- and in
fact they will even deceive the public and call it
"naturally-occurring fluoride." There's nothing
natural about fluorosilicic acid.
- If you go to any community water supply where they are
dripping so called "fluoride" into the water
system, you will find out where they actually get the
fluoride -- ask them, "Hey, do you dig this out of
the ground in natural fluoride deposits?," and they
will tell you "No, we buy it from an industrial waste
processing company because it's cheaper than fluoride out
of the ground." I've asked this question myself of
people who are in charge of dripping fluoride into the
public water supply, and that's exactly what they have
told me. You can verify this yourself and find out just
how your local community is poisoning you and your family
with this highly toxic waste chemical.
- How To Poison The Entire Population
- Again, we are the only species stupid enough to actually
poison ourselves. And we do it in highly efficient ways.
If you want to poison a population, there's no easier way
than to drip a substance into the water supply. And if you
really want to make sure everyone is poisoned, you would
pass laws that mandate the dripping of this poison into
the water supply (i.e. fluoridation laws). That would
ensure that everybody gets some, whether it's an infant,
an adult or a senior citizen. This is increasingly what is
happening across the United States and around the world.
- There's absolutely no good science behind any of the
fluoride arguments. Even if they were using genuine
natural fluoride, there are no studies that show the
ingestion of fluoride decreases the incidence of dental
caries in modern society. Yet this myth persists in the
dental community, and the American Dental Association
stands firmly behind this national poisoning agenda. They
will call anybody who disagrees with it a "nut,"
and they will say that every population must be
fluoridated -- for their own good, of course. That's the
only way to ensure they have healthy teeth, the logic
goes.
- Put More Chemicals In Our Food, Please
- If you wanted to poison the entire population, but you
were worried that not everyone drinks from the water
supply, there is another way: just poison the food supply.
This, too, is happening today, with food manufacturing
practices and the FDA looking the other way on toxic food
ingredients.
- Our population is being poisoned with artificial
chemical sweeteners. Let's take a look at these. Aspartame
is a sweetener that was never proven safe; in fact, the
original safety recommendation panel at the FDA
recommended that aspartame be denied approval as a safe
food ingredient. It was none other than Donald Rumsfeld at
the time who helped push aspartame through the FDA to get
it legalized as a food additive.
- Today, we now see the vast majority of complaints of
food side effects sent to the FDA being caused by
aspartame. Aspartame is an excitotoxin, that is, a
neurotoxic chemical, and it breaks down in your body into
both formic acid and formaldehyde. Now, would you like to
go out and drink some formaldehyde? Well, you might do
that if you were a biological specimen that needed to be
preserved for dissection, but if you're a normal, healthy,
sane human being, you'd never drink formaldehyde. Unless,
of course, they put it in an artificial sweetener compound
and added it to cans of your favorite carbonated soft
drink, in which case Americans will gladly drink
formaldehyde in can after can, poisoning their nervous
systems, going half blind, experiencing epilepsy and
increasing the onset of neurodegenerative disorders such
as Alzheimer's disease.
- Again, we're the only species stupid enough to actually
poison ourselves with these chemicals. And yet we have
entire groups, food lobbies and public apologizers who run
around saying that these ingredients are perfectly good
for you. There's nothing wrong with drinking formaldehyde
and formic acid. You'll be fine! Drink more! Here, in fact
here's a 50 percent more coupon, so you can buy even more!
- Want Some Chlorine In Your Food Today?
- Some say, "Well, aspartame is on the way out -- the
big sweetener now is Sucralose or Splenda." This is
the artificial sweetener that claims to be made from
sugar. Well, I suppose you can claim that it starts out as
sugar, but it's made by removing some of the atoms from
sugar and replacing them with atoms of chlorine, which is
of course one of the chemical elements used during the
atrocities of World War II to create poison gas, the same
element used in chlorine to disinfect pools and public
water supplies.
- When it's put that way, you might start thinking,
"Well, gee, maybe there's something wrong with this
sugar, maybe I shouldn't be putting chlorine atoms into my
body." Would you go out and drink chlorine? If you
know anybody who works on pools, or who has a pool
maintenance business, they will tell you that chlorine gas
will kill you. In fact, just to handle chlorine, they have
to wear protective rubber gloves and protective
respiration devices, because if they get chlorine powder
wet and touch it or inhale it, they are in for a world of
hurt. Chlorine gas can cause serious injury or even death.
In fact, if you just take household ingredients like
chlorine bleach and mix it with ammonia, you will create a
highly toxic gas that will literally kill you, which is
why these products often contain warnings that they should
not be mixed.
- And yet, in our food supply, we take chlorine atoms and
we attach them to molecules that used to be sugar, and we
call that a safe sweetener. And now we're putting it into
all kinds of foods, whether it's soft drinks, muffins,
pancake mixes and pretty much everything in the low-carb
arena. I'm not sure people realize that they are actually
ingesting chlorine atoms. Maybe they're too dazed from the
fluoride.
- Okay, so far we have dentists putting mercury fillings
in your mouth that give off mercury vapor and cause
neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease.
We have the same insane dentists mandating the dripping of
EPA-regulated environmental pollutants into the public
water supply, making sure that human beings in the United
States have to drink toxic waste product... after which it
enters into the rivers and streams as part of human waste,
even though if such chemicals were dripped directly into
the rivers and streams in this country it would be a
violation of federal law. We have food and beverage
companies using artificial chemical sweeteners to replace
sugar and claiming that their products are healthier than
sugar products. And yet, these artificial chemical
sweeteners break down into dangerous chemical components
such as formaldehyde and formic acid, or they are made
with chlorine atoms that simply do not belong in the human
body. These chemicals do not appear anywhere in nature
attached to a sugar molecule.
- Yummy Poison: Hydrogenated Oils
- So, what else can the money-hungry corporations think of
to put into the food or the water to poison America? They
are quite creative and they have a lot of poisons at their
disposal. The next terrible poison on the list is
hydrogenated oils. They're called brain poisons, and
they're present in perhaps half of all the foods found at
every grocery store. It's listed right on the label -- you
can see it as hydrogenated oil" or
"partially-hydrogenated vegetable oil".
- This artificial fat directly causes cardiovascular heart
disease, it destroys normal cardiovascular health, it
destroys the healthy functioning of the nervous system, it
causes brain disorders, it causes heart attacks -- it is
one of the most prominent and yet toxic ingredients put
into the food supply. It also causes birth defects and
essential fatty acid deficiencies in both the mother and
her fetus.
- And it's put in foods on purpose, for the convenience of
the food manufacturers. Hydrogenated oils don't go bad,
which means they save money for the food manufacturing
companies, because their foods don't go bad on the
shelves. And how do you make hydrogenated oils? Well, you
don't find them anywhere in nature -- you have to have a
chemical processing facility to make hydrogenated oils.
And you do it by bubbling hydrogen gas through liquid
soybean oil or other types of oils, using a catalyst (in
most cases the catalyst is nickel). So with this nickel
and the bubbling of hydrogen gas, you get extra hydrogen
atoms attached to the molecules in oil, which makes them
solid at room temperature. Since they are solid at room
temperature, they can be more easily used to make
margarine products, or used in crackers and cookies. And
all of this, again, is for the convenience of the food
manufacturing companies.
- Food manufactures don't care what happens to your
health, their job is just to sell food products. If you
have a health problem as a result, that's your problem,
not theirs. You won't find food companies offering to pay
for your medical bills if you have a heart attack from
eating hydrogenated oils. They are basically passing the
buck and demanding that you pay for the health
consequences caused by their foods. In fact, they're
working hard to pass legislation that would outlaw
lawsuits against food companies!
- Pepperoni-Shaped Poison
- Not to be outdone, the meat processing companies in this
country also want to make sure they get lots of poison
into your food products. It's not enough to just sell you
red meat, which is by itself an extremely unhealthy food
ingredient that promotes colon cancer, heart disease,
obesity and many other disorders, they also have to put
cancer-causing chemicals in various meat products.
- This makes sure that you get colon cancer from the
additives, if not from the red meat itself. This additive
is called sodium nitrite, and you'll find it in virtually
every packaged meat product found at the grocery store,
whether it's pepperoni, breakfast sausage, or bacon. You
can buy sliced ham, sliced chicken, deli slices, lunch
meat, packaged ham, pepperoni, the meat that goes into
soups, the meat that goes into those little lunch trays
... pretty much any form of packaged meat at the grocery
store has this toxic ingredient in it. That's why the
daily consumption of processed meats has now been
clinically shown to produce a 6,700% increase in the risk
of pancreatic cancer!
- Guinea Pig People
- And what is this ingredient again? Sodium nitrite! When
you ingest sodium nitrite, it mixes with the digestive
juices of your stomach and creates a class of chemical
compounds called nitrosamines. These nitrosamines are
potent cancer-causing chemicals. In fact, as I've
mentioned before, they are so potent that lab researchers
actually inject mice with nitrosamines when they want to
give those mice breast cancer or other form of cancer they
can study. And yet, as humans, we put sodium nitrite (see
related ebook on sodium nitrite) right into the food
supply. It's almost as if we were treating the entire
population as lab rats -- and in fact that's not far from
the truth.
- Drugs are frequently released in this country on an
experimental basis, using the population as guinea pigs to
find out how many people might die from that drug in order
to get more safety data. Let's face it, when the FDA
approves drugs for public use, they are not at all proven
safe. The American public is routinely treated as a
collection of guinea pigs in order to promote prescription
drugs, foods, artificial sweeteners or other elements.
- Toxic Personal Care Products
- So now we've got toxic chemicals in our mouths, in our
public water supplies, and in our foods and beverages.
Where else can money hungry corporations put toxic
chemicals into our immediate environment and get them into
our bodies? Well, think hard and you might come up with
some other ideas. Let's look at the personal care products
industry, because practically every brand name shampoo,
cologne, perfume, deodorant, antiperspirant or other
personal care product on the market is made with toxic
fragrance chemicals. These can contain solvents,
carcinogens and compounds that are registered in
government databases as having strong liver toxicity.
- The reason these ingredients are allowed in these
products are because the FDA has mistakenly assumed for
many, many years that whatever you put on your body
doesn't get absorbed into your body. They think, for
example, that you could just coat your body with toxic
chemicals and you would be fine, because your skin is a
barrier. I've even heard pharmacists tell me that the skin
is a great barrier, so whatever you put on your skin won't
go into your body.
- That's utterly ridiculous! As pharmacists, haven't these
people ever sold nicotine patches? How do you think those
work? They work by releasing nicotine that gets absorbed
directly through your skin into your bloodstream. If your
skin didn't absorb nicotine, the nicotine patches wouldn't
deliver a dosage. You have to be half-crazy to think that
the skin is some kind of permanent barrier that keeps out
everything you put on it.
- In fact, the skin is very porous -- the skin breathes.
Yes, it keeps out bacteria, but it sure doesn't keep out
chemical solvents, and it doesn't keep out molecules as
big as nicotine. Nicotine molecules are not very small, by
the way. There are many things that go right through your
skin, and those include fragrance chemicals, solvents, and
a lot of other toxic ingredients that are found in
personal care products. One such ingredient called MIT was
recently discovered in most brand-name shampoos, and this
MIT ingredient is known to cause brain cancer.
- Voluntary Chemical Suicide
- So now we are really stupid as a species, because we've
poisoned our mouths, our water supply, our food, our
beverages and even our shampoos and personal care
products. And if you use dryer sheets, then you've got
your clothes poisoned as well, they're coated in a layer
of toxic chemicals found in dryer sheet products. So what
else could we use to poison the population? There are
still many other options.
- One way would be to sell a toxic chemical that people
voluntarily put into their mouths because another person
in a position of authority told them to do so. This is
describing the prescription drug industry, where people
are poisoning themselves each and every day with toxic
painkiller drugs like COX-2 inhibitors or toxic
anti-cholesterol drugs like statin drugs. People are
poisoning their minds with antidepressant drugs that
promote violent behavior and suicides. They're poisoning
their cardiovascular system with beta-blockers and other
drugs. And of course they're poisoning their livers.
- And yet people volunteer to do this -- each and every
day they will put these toxic chemicals into their bodies
simply because someone with a degree from a school of
disease (also known as medical school) told them to do so.
And, not only that, they will actually pay for the
privilege of poisoning their own bodies.
- They'll pay good money too, not just a few hundred
dollars a month, but several thousand dollars a month.
Some people will spend six figures a year poisoning their
bodies because their doctor told them to do so. And, then
when something goes wrong and they have a small tumor show
up on a mammogram, or some other blood test comes back
positive that indicates they may have some sort of cancer
tumor, they will gladly pay another $100,000 or more in
order to destroy their entire immune system with a
treatment known as chemotherapy.
- They will literally sit there and let other doctors
inject highly toxic poisons directly into the bloodstream
and allow them to circulate through their body. How toxic
is this stuff? Well, gee, think about it, your hair falls
out, you get sick and you vomit -- are these signs that
maybe this stuff doesn't belong in your body? I don't know
about you, but I think that's a very strange way to heal
someone.
- If I were a medical professional and I were healing
someone, and I had them do something which made their hair
fall out and they started vomiting and it looked like they
were going to melt away right before my very eyes, I would
think that, hey, maybe this isn't good for them.
- But that's not what conventional oncologists think. They
think, oh, this is great stuff. Look, we're going to
destroy the cancer tumor and, if we're lucky, there may
even be a patient left by the time we're done. And if not
-- that's alright, as long as they pay the bill.
- Official, Government-Approved Drug Dealers
- We as a species actually have a class of professionals,
highly-paid professionals, who we give the right to poison
us with toxic chemicals. These people are called doctors.
I call them drug dealers. Just like illegal drugs, their
drugs kill people. The main difference is that these
"legal" drugs enrich politically influential
corporations, whereas illegal drugs enrich drug lords. Our
national "War on Drugs" is quite selective in
its targets, don't you think? Industrial hemp is outlawed,
but doping up millions of children on powerful narcotics
is perfectly legal: it's called Ritalin.
- So, remember, we're the only species stupid enough to
actually poison ourselves. And if we don't do it in just
one or two ways, we do it in half a dozen different ways!
Then we regulate that poisoning, we make it federal law!
And we have lobbyists and groups out there defending this
use of poison in the food supply, and defending the use of
it in cosmetic products and personal care products. We
have defenders of the drug industry, people who say,
"Yeah, well there was a study five years ago that
showed a 1200 percent heart attack increase, but we
thought that really wasn't relevant to this drug and we
decided to go ahead and market that drug anyway."
That's what we have today. And the real details of this
gruesome story have only begun to be uncovered. Wait until
the rest of the story comes out...
- We're #1!
- Is it any wonder, with all of the poisoning going on at
all the different levels in our bodies, that we are now
the most chronically diseased population that has ever
been recorded in the history of civilization? It's true --
there is no population that has suffered from diseases
like we do in America today. You would have to be
clinically insane to not think that there's a correlation
between the poison we are putting into our bodies and the
diseases we are getting as a result.
- Plus, as recent studies have shown, we're the #1 nation
in the world in terms of mental disorders as well! Let's
see: #1 in obesity, #1 in diabetes, #1 in cancer, #1
mental disorders, and we have the HIGHEST health care
costs in the world, too. We have the most expensive drugs
in the world. We have more doctors and health care
professionals per capita than any country in the world.
And, frighteningly, we're the country with the most nukes.
Great idea, huh? Put the nuclear weapons under control of
the most mentally disturbed population in the world... now
if only our leaders were at least sane...
- But no, wait a minute -- the doctors are right, all
diseases are just genetic. None of these poisons matter,
it's just your genes. They say the gene pool of the human
race was perfectly fine 100 years ago when people didn't
have all these diseases, but it has somehow mutated to a
gene pool that gives you heart disease and cancer and
osteoporosis and diabetes, and, by the way, there's
nothing you can do about it. That's what they want you to
believe, because then they take away your power. Then you
have no ability to make changes.
- Actually, We're Pretty Darned Clever, Aren't We?
- Not only are we the most stupid species on the planet,
because we're poisoning ourselves, we are simultaneously
the cleverest species, because we find ways to justify all
that poisoning. We find scientific gobbledygook to claim
that, yes, NutraSweet is good for you! Or that these
chlorine atoms attached to sugar are great for you, or
that mercury in your mouth somehow doesn't have a toxic
effect on your body. Or that hydrogenated oils are
perfectly fine for your heart health.
- We stupidly say if you take those and you drink this
weight loss shake made with sugar, you'll be healthy. And
if you have this barbaric surgical procedure called
gastric bypass surgery, you'll no longer be obese. And if
you're not healthy, don't worry; we have magic bullet
prescription drugs that will make you even healthier. So
we're a clever population at the same time that we're
incredibly stupid. Do you know what that's called? That's
called being a population of great technicians and lousy
healers. And that's exactly what we are today.
- Having used the word "stupid" throughout this
editorial, I use it deliberately. I don't mean it in the
way that a teenager might say, "My stupid little
brother flipped me off." I mean it in a more precise
way, in the way defined by Dictionary.com:
- Stupid:
- 1. Slow to learn or understand; obtuse. 2. Tending to
make poor decisions or careless mistakes. 3. Marked by a
lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless: a
stupid mistake. 4. Dazed, stunned, or stupefied.
- Can you think of a better word to describe the people
around here?
- As Einstein once said, "Only two things are
infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former."
- http://www.newstarget.com/008511.html
-

|
|
| 61 |
Rense.com
-
MSG - Slowly
Poisoning America
Author Unknown
5-1-4
- I wondered if there could be an
actual chemical causing the massive obesity
epidemic, so did a friend of mine, John Erb. He
was a research assistant at the University of
Waterloo, and spent years working for the
government.
- He made an amazing discovery
while going through scientific journals for a book
he was writing called The Slow Poisoning of
America. In hundreds of studies around the world,
scientists were creating obese mice and rats to
use in diet or diabetes test studies.
- No strain of rat or mice is
naturally obese, so the scientists have to create
them. They make these morbidly obese creatures by
injecting them with a chemical when they are first
born. The MSG triples the amount of insulin the
pancreas creates, causing rats (and humans?) to
become obese They even have a title for the race
of fat rodents they create: "MSG-Treated
Rats" .
- MSG?
- I was shocked too. I went to my
kitchen, checking the cupboards and the fridge.
- MSG was in everything! The
Campbell's soups, the Hostess Doritos, the Lays
flavored potato chips, Top Ramen, Betty Crocker
Hamburger Helper, Heinz canned gravy, Swanson
frozen prepared meals, Kraft salad dressings,
especially the 'healthy low fat' ones. The items
that didn't have MSG had something called
Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein, which is just
another name for Monosodium Glutamate. It was
shocking to see just how many of the foods we feed
our children everyday are filled with this stuff.
They hide MSG under many different names in order
to fool those who catch on.
- But it didn't stop there. When
our family went out to eat, we started asking at
the restaurants what menu items had MSG. Many
employees, even the managers, swore they didn't
use MSG. But when we ask for the ingredient list,
which they grudgingly provided, sure enough MSG
and Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein were everywhere.
Burger King, McDonalds, Wendy's, Taco Bell, every
restaurant, even the sit down ones like TGIF,
Chilis', Applebees and Denny's use MSG in
abundance. Kentucky Fried Chicken seemed to be the
WORST offender: MSG was in every chicken dish,
salad dressing and gravy. No wonder I loved to eat
that coating on the skin, their secret spice was
MSG!
- So why is MSG in so may of the
foods we eat? Is it a preservative or a vitamin?
- Not according to my friend John.
In the book he wrote, an expose of the food
additive industry called The Slow Poisoning of
America, (www.spofamerica.com ), he said that MSG
is added to food for the addictive effect it has
on the human body.
- Even the propaganda website
sponsored by the food manufacturers lobby group
supporting MSG at
http://www.msgfacts.com/facts/msgfact12.html
explains that the reason they add it to food is to
make people eat more. A study of elderly people
showed that people eat more of the foods that it
is added to. The Glutamate Association lobby group
says eating more benefits the elderly, but what
does it do to the rest of us?
- 'Betcha can't eat just one',
takes on a whole new meaning where MSG is
concerned!
- And we wonder why the nation is
overweight? The MSG manufacturers themselves admit
that it addicts people to their products. It makes
people choose their product over others, and makes
people eat more of it than they would if MSG
wasn't added.
- Not only is MSG scientifically
proven to cause obesity, it is an addictive
substance: NICOTINE for FOOD!
- Since its introduction into the
American food supply fifty years ago, MSG has been
added in larger and larger doses to the
prepackaged meals, soups, snacks and fast foods we
are tempted to eat everyday.
- The FDA has set no limits on how
much of it can be added to food. They claim it's
safe to eat in any amount.
- How can they claim it is safe
when there are hundreds of scientific studies with
titles like these?
- The monosodium glutamate (MSG)
obese rat as a model for the study of exercise in
obesity. Gobatto CA, Mello MA, Souza CT, Ribeiro
IA. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol. 2002
- Adrenalectomy abolishes the
food-induced hypothalamic serotonin release in
both normal and monosodium glutamate-obese rats.
Guimaraes RB, Telles MM, Coelho VB, Mori RC,
Nascimento CM, Ribeiro Brain Res Bull. 2002 Aug
- Obesity induced by neonatal
monosodium glutamate treatment in spontaneously
hypertensive rats: an animal model of multiple
risk factors. Iwase M, Yamamoto M, Iino K,
Ichikawa K, Shinohara N, Yoshinari Fujishima
- Hypertens Res. 1998 Mar
- Hypothalamic lesion induced by
injection of monosodium glutamate in suckling
period and subsequent development of obesity.
Tanaka K, Shimada M, Nakao K, Kusunoki Exp Neurol.
1978 Oct
- Yes, that last study was not a
typo, it WAS written in 1978. Both the medical
research community and food
"manufaturers" have known MSG's side
effects for decades!
- Many more studies mentioned in
John Erb's book link MSG to Diabetes,
- Migraines and headaches, Autism,
ADHD and even Alzheimer's.
- But what can we do to stop the
food manufactures from dumping fattening and
addictive MSG into our food supply and causing the
obesity epidemic we now see?
- Even as you read this, George W.
Bush and his corporate supporters are pushing a
Bill through Congress. Called the "Personal
Responsibility in Food Consumption Act" also
known as the "Cheeseburger Bill", this
sweeping law bans anyone from suing food
manufacturers, sellers and distributors. Even if
it comes out that they purposely added an
addictive chemical to their foods. Read about it
for yourself at:
http://www.yahoo.com.http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?
tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040311/ap_on_go_co/obesity_lawsuits_4
- The Bill has already been rushed
through the House of Representatives, and is due
for the same rubber stamp at Senate level. It is
important that Bush and his corporate supporters
get it through before the media lets everyone know
about MSG, the intentional Nicotine for food.
- Several months ago, John Erb
took his book and his concerns to one of the
highest government health officials in Canada.
While sitting in the Government office, the
official told him "Sure I know how bad MSG
is, I wouldn't touch the stuff!" But this top
level government official refused to tell the
public what he knew.
- The big media doesn't want to
tell the public either, fearing legal issues with
their advertisers. It seems that the fallout on
the fast food industry may hurt their profit
margin.
- So what do we do?
- The food producers and
restaurants have been addicting us to their
products for years, and now we are paying the
price for it.
- Our children should not be
cursed with obesity caused by an addictive food
additive.
- But what can I do about it? I'm
just one voice, what can I do to stop the
poisoning of our children, while guys like Bush
are insuring financial protection for the industry
that is poisoning us.
- I for one am doing something
about it.
- I am sending this email out to
everyone I know in an attempt to show you the
truth that the corporate owned politicians and
media won't tell you.
- The best way you can help save
yourself and your children from this drug-induced
epidemic, is to forward this email to everyone.
With any luck, it will circle the globe before
Bush can pass the Bill protecting those who
poisoned us.
- The food industry learned a lot
from the tobacco industry. Imagine if big tobacco
had a bill like this in place before someone blew
the whistle on Nicotine?
- Blow the whistle on MSG.
- If you are one of the few who
can still believe that MSG is good for us, and you
don't believe what John Erb has to say, see for
yourself. Go to the National Library of Medicine,
at www.pubmed.com
- http://www.pubmed.com . Type in
the words "MSG Obese", and read a few of
the 115 medical studies that appear.
- We do not want to be rats in one
giant experiment, and we do not approve of food
that makes us into a nation of obese, lethargic,
addicted sheep, waiting for the slaughter.
- With your help we can put an end
to this, and stop the Slow Poisoning of America.
Let's save our children
- http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/FluoridePoisoning/message/1908
-

|
| 62 |
Hidden Sources Of MSG
In Foods
From the book 'Excitotoxins - The Taste That Kills'
By Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD
3-6-3 What if someone were to tell you
that a chemical (MSG) added to food could cause
brain damage in your children, and that this
chemical could effect how your children's nervous
systems formed during development so that in later
years they may have learning or emotional
difficulties? What if there was scientific
evidence that these chemicals could permanently
damage a critical part of the brain known to
control hormones so that later in life your child
might have endocrine problems? How would you feel?
Suppose evidence was presented to you strongly
suggesting that the artificial sweetener in your
diet soft drink may cause brain tumors to develop,
and that the number of brain tumors reported since
the introduction of this widespread introduction
of this artificial sweetener has risen
dramatically? Would that affect your decision to
drink these products and especially to allow your
children to drink them? What if you could be shown
overwhelming evidence that one of the main
ingredients in this sweetener (aspartate) could
cause the same brain lesions as MSG? Would that
affect your buying decisions? And finally, what if it could be
demonstrated that all of these types of chemicals,
called excitotoxins, could possibly aggravate or
even precipitate many of today's epidemic
neurodegenerative brain diseases such as Parkinson's
disease, Huntington's disease, ALS, and Alzheimer's
disease? Would you be concerned if you knew that
these excitotoxin food additives are a particular
risk if you have diabetes, or have ever had a
stroke, brain injury, brain tumor, seizure, or have
suffered from hypertension, meningitis, or viral
encephalitis?
Would you also be upset to learn
that many of the brain lesions caused by these
products in your children are irreversible and can
result from a SINGLE exposure of these products in
sufficient concentration?
How would you feel when you learn
the food industry hides and disguises these
excitotoxin additives (MSG and Aspartate) so they
can't be recognized? Incredulous? Enraged? The fact
is many foods are labeled as having "No
MSG" but in fact not only contain MSG but also
are laced with other excitotoxins of equal potency
and danger.
All of the above are true. And all
of these well known brain toxins are poured into our
food and drink by the thousands of tons to boost
sales. These additives have NO OTHER purpose other
than to enhance to TASTE of food and the SWEETNESS
of various diet products. Hidden Sources Of MSG As discussed previously, the
glutamate (MSG) manufacturers and the processed food
industries are always on a quest to disguise the MSG
added to food. Below is a partial list of the most
common names for disguised MSG. Remember also that
the powerful excitotoxins, aspartate and L-cystine,
are frequently added to foods and according to FDA
rules require NO LABELING AT ALL. * Food Additives that ALWAYS
contain MSG * Monosodium Glutamate Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein
Hydrolyzed Protein
Hydrolyzed Plant Protein
Plant Protein Extract
Sodium Caseinate
Calcium Caseinate
Yeast Extract
Textured Protein (Including TVP)
Autolyzed Yeast
Hydrolyzed Oat Flour
Corn Oil
* Food Additives That
FREQUENTLY Contain MSG *
Malt Extract
Malt Flavoring
Bouillon
Broth
Stock
Flavoring
Natural Flavors/Flavoring
Natural Beef Or Chicken Flavoring
Seasoning
Spices
* Food Additives That MAY
Contain MSG Or Excitotoxins *
Carrageenan
Enzymes
Soy Protein Concentrate
Soy Protein Isolate
Whey Protein Concentrate
Also: Protease Enzymes of various sources can release
excitotoxin amino acids from food proteins
Aspartame - An Intense Source
Of Excitotoxins
Aspartame is a sweetener made from
two amino acids, phenylalanine and the excitotoxin
aspartate. It should be avoided at all costs.
Aspartame complaints accounts for approximately 70%
of ALL complaints to the FDA. It is implicated in
everything from blindness to headaches to
convulsions. Sold under dozens of brand names such
as NutraSweet and Equal, aspartame breaks down
within 20 minutes at room temperature into several
primary toxic and dangerous ingredients:
1. DKP (diketopiperazine) (When ingested, converts to a
near duplicate of
a powerful brain tumor causing agent)
2. Formic Acid (ant venom)
3. Formaldehyde (embalming fluid)
4. Methanol (causes blindness...extremely dangerous
substance)
Common Examples:
Diet soft drinks, sugar free gums,
sugar free Kool Aid, Crystal Light, childrens'
medications, and thousands of other products
claiming to be 'low calorie', 'diet', or 'sugar
free'.
A Final Note...
Dr. Blaylock recounted a meeting
with a senior executive in the food additive
industry who told him point blank that these
excitotoxins are going to be in our food no matter
how many name changes are necessary...

|
| 63 |
Better Omega 3 To Omega 6 Ratio Could
Reduce Depression And Boost Mood According To A New
Study
Improving the ratio of Omega 3 to Omega 6 Essential
Oils in the Diet may improve mood and reduce
depression, suggests a new study.
Researchers from Ohio State University compared
markers for inflammation, and found that people with
high ratios of Omega 6 to Omega 3 Essential Fatty Acids
were more likely to suffer depression and inflammatory
diseases.
"Our findings highlight ways in which diet may
enhance or inhibit depression-related inflammation
among older adults," wrote lead author Janice
Kiecolt-Glaser, in the Journal Psychosomatic Medicine.
"These behavior-dietary-immune interactions have
important implications for both mental and physical
health."
The new study adds to the growing body of evidence
linking an increased Omega 3 to Omega 6 intake ratio to
improved health.
|
| 64 |
Selenium pills 'may combat HIV'
Taking daily selenium supplements may block the build
up of HIV in a patient's blood, research suggests.
The University of Miami found a lower HIV viral load in
patients who took selenium supplements for nine months.
Selenium deficiencies have been recorded in HIV
patients, and evidence suggests the mineral can improve
the function of the immune system.
The Archives of Internal Medicine study suggests the
supplements may be a cheap and easy way to help keep
HIV in check.
This research suggests that selenium supplements may be
useful in addition to traditional combination therapy
Roger Pebody
Terrence Higgins Trust
Advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) have given HIV
patients a longer life expectancy.
However, strict adherence to the therapy is required to
keep HIV viral counts low, and there is a risk of side
effects.
Therefore, scientists have been searching for
alternative treatments to keep HIV under control.
More immune cells
Over nine months, the University of Miami team gave 91
HIV patients a daily capsule containing 200 micrograms
of high-selenium yeast, and another 83 patients a daily
placebo capsule.
The two groups had similar selenium levels at the
beginning of the study, but after nine months levels
were higher in the group taking the capsules containing
the mineral.
Those with higher selenium levels in their blood were
more likely to have a lower HIV viral load, and higher
numbers of CD4 cells, which play a key role in fighting
off infection.
The researchers said the exact mechanism by which
selenium exerts its effects on HIV is not known.
One hypothesis is that selenium's antioxidant
properties may repair damage done to immune cells by
oxygen, which is produced at higher levels in the
bodies of patients with HIV.
Writing in the journal, the researchers said:
"Given the challenges of using conventional
pharmacotherapy to achieve and maintain virologic
suppression in HIV-spectrum disease, our results
support the use of selenium as a simple, inexpensive
and safe adjunct therapy."
Roger Pebody, of the HIV charity Terrence Higgins
Trust, said: "We have known for some time that
selenium plays a role in the immune system, but
previous studies before combination therapy didn't show
that these supplements have an impact on HIV.
"This research is more encouraging and suggests
that selenium supplements may be useful in addition to
traditional combination therapy.
"However, we wouldn't advise that people with HIV
should rush out and buy these supplements immediately.
"Decisions on the value of taking supplements
should always be made in consultation with your
doctor."
Yusef Azad, director of the National Aids Trust,
described the research as valuable.
"However, in interpreting this new report, it must
be remembered that antiretroviral therapy is the only
currently effective treatment for HIV.
"Selenium may have a supportive role alongside
antiretroviral therapy but it cannot be a treatment in
itself. "
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/6623631.stm
Published: 2007/05/05 23:24:29 GMT
© BBC MMVII
|
| 65 |
Med diet 'cuts lung disease risk'
Eating a Mediterranean diet halves the risk of serious
lung disease like emphysema and bronchitis, a study
says.
Grouped under the umbrella term chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD), they are expected to become
the world's third leading cause of death by 2020.
French researchers tracked almost 43,000 men for 12
years.
The Thorax study suggests the key could be that the
Mediterranean diet is rich in anti-oxidants, which
reduce the risk of tissue inflammation.
Alternatively, lower levels of sugar and nitrates in
the diet - both of which have been linked to impaired
lung function - may play a role.
People in the Mediterranean eat lots of fruit,
vegetables, whole grains and fish.
A more standard Western diet tends to include higher
levels of processed foods, refined sugars, and cured
and red meats.
The researchers, from the French research institute
Inserm, found that a Mediterranean diet was associated
with a 50% lower risk of developing COPD than the
Western diet - even after taking factors such as
smoking and age into account.
And men who ate a predominantly Western diet were more
than four times as likely to develop COPD.
Other benefits
The study showed that the higher the compliance with a
Mediterranean diet, the lower the risk of developing
COPD over the 12-year period.
Conversely, the higher the compliance with the Western
diet, the higher was the risk of developing COPD.
Last month, an international study reported that a
Mediterranean diet helped prevent the development of
asthma and respiratory allergies in children.
And last year, US researchers found that eating a
Mediterranean diet could reduce the risk of developing
Alzheimer's.
Dr Keith Prowse, chairman of the British Lung
Foundation, said: "COPD is a hugely disabling
illness and we welcome the findings of this large study
which provide an interesting insight into a possible
link between diet and the disease.
"COPD is the only major cause of death whose
incidence is on the increase in the UK and we urgently
need more research into all aspects of the disease so
that health services can prevent and treat it more
effectively."
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/6647811.stm
Published: 2007/05/15 00:05:04 GMT
© BBC MMVII
|
| 66 |
Mammograms cause breast cancer
(and other cancer facts you probably never knew)
by Dawn Prate
Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among
American women between the ages of 44 and 55. Dr.
Gofinan, in his book, Preventing Breast Cancer,
cites this startling statistic along with an in-depth
look at mammographic screening, an early-detection
practice that agencies like the American Cancer Society
recommend to women of all age groups. According to most
health experts, catching a tumor in its early stages
increases a woman's chances of survival by at least 17
percent.
The most common method for early
detection is mammography. A mammogram is an X-ray
picture of your breast that can reveal tumor growths
otherwise undetectable in a physical exam. Like all
x-rays, mammograms
use doses of ionizing radiation to create this image.
Radiologists then analyze the image for any abnormal
growths. Despite continuous improvements and
innovations, mammography
has garnered a sizable opposition in the medical
community because of an error rate that is still high
and the amount of harmful radiation used in the
procedure.
Effectiveness of Mammography
Is mammography an effective tool for detecting tumors?
Some critics say no. In a Swedish study of 60,000
women, 70 percent of the mammographically detected
tumors weren't tumors at all. These "false
positives" aren't just financial and emotional
strains, they may also lead to many unnecessary and
invasive biopsies. In fact, 70 to 80 percent of all
positive mammograms do not, upon biopsy,
show any presence of cancer.
At the same time, mammograms also have a high rate
of missed tumors, or "false negatives." Dr.
Samuel S. Epstein, in his book, The Politics Of
Cancer, claims that in women ages 40 to 49, one in
four instances of cancer is missed at each mammography.
The National
Cancer Institute (NCI) puts the false negative rate
even higher at 40 percent among women ages 40-49. National
Institutes of Health spokespeople also admit that
mammograms miss 10 percent of malignant tumors in women
over 50. Researchers have found that breast tissue is
denser among younger women, making it difficult to
detect tumors. For this reason, false negatives are
twice as likely to occur in premenopausal mammograms.
Radiation Risks
Many critics of mammography cite the hazardous health
effects of radiation. In 1976, the controversy over
radiation and mammography reached a saturation point.
At that time mammographic technology delivered five to
10 rads (radiation-absorbed doses) per screening, as
compared to 1 rad in current screening methods. In
women between the ages of 35 and 50, each rad of
exposure increased the risk of breast
cancer by one percent, according to Dr. Frank
Rauscher, then-director of the NCI.
According to Russell L. Blaylock, MD, one estimate
is that annual radiological breast exams increase the
risk of breast cancer by two percent a year. So over 10
years the risk will have increased 20 percent. In the
1960s and 70s, women, even those who received 10
screenings a year, were never told the risk they faced
from exposure. In the midst of the 1976 radiation
debate, Kodak,
a major manufacturer of mammography film, took out
full-page ads in scientific journals entitled About
breast cancer and X-rays:
A hopeful message from industry on a sober topic.
Despite better technology and decreased doses of
radiation, scientists still claim mammography is a
substantial risk. Dr. John W. Gofman, an authority on
the health effects of ionizing radiation, estimates
that 75 percent of breast cancer could be prevented by
avoiding or minimizing exposure to the ionizing
radiation. This includes mammography, x-rays and other
medical and dental sources.
Since mammographic screening was introduced, the
incidence of a form of breast cancer called ductal
carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased by 328 percent.
Two hundred percent of this increase is allegedly due
to mammography. In addition to harmful radiation,
mammography may also help spread existing cancer
cells due to the considerable pressure placed on
the woman's breast during the procedure. According to
some health practitioners, this compression could cause
existing cancer cells to metastasize from the breast
tissue.
Cancer research has also found a gene, called
oncogene AC, that is extremely sensitive to even small
doses of radiation. A significant percentage of women
in the United
States have this gene, which could increase their
risk of mammography-induced cancer. They estimate that
10,000 A-T carriers will die of breast cancer this year
due to mammography.
The risk of radiation is apparently higher among
younger women. The NCI released evidence that, among
women under 35, mammography could cause 75 cases of
breast cancer for every 15 it identifies. Another
Canadian study found a 52 percent increase in breast
cancer mortality in young women given annual
mammograms. Dr. Samuel Epstein also claims that
pregnant women exposed to radiation could endanger
their fetus. He advises against mammography during
pregnancy because "the future risks of leukemia to
your unborn child, not to mention birth
defects, are just not worth it." Similarly,
studies reveal that children exposed to radiation are
more likely to develop breast cancer as adults.
Navigating the Statistics
While the number of deaths caused by breast
cancer has decreased, the incidence of breast
cancer is still rising. Since 1940, the incidence of
breast cancer has risen by one to two percent every
year. Between 1973 and 1991, the incidence of breast
cancer in females over 65 rose nearly 40 percent in the
United States.
Some researchers attribute this increase to better
detection technologies; i.e., as the number of women
screened for breast cancer rises, so does the number of
reported cases. Other analysts say the correlation
between mammographic screening and increases in breast
cancer is much more ominous, suggesting radiation
exposure is responsible for the growing number of
cases. While the matter is still being debated,
Professor Sandra Steingraber offers ways to navigate
these statistics. According to Steingraber, the rise in
breast cancer predates the introduction of mammograms
as a common diagnostic tool. In addition, the groups of
women in whom breast cancer incidence is ascending most
swiftly – blacks and the elderly – are also least
likely to get regular mammograms.
The majority of health experts agree that the risk
of breast cancer for women under 35 is not high enough
to warrant the risk of radiation exposure. Similarly,
the risk of breast cancer to women over 55 justifies
the risk of mammograms. The statistics about
mammography and women between the ages of 40 and 55 are
the most contentious. A 1992 Canadian National Breast
Cancer Study showed that mammography had no positive
effect on mortality for women between the ages of 40
and 50. In fact, the study seemed to suggest that women
in that age group are more likely to die of breast
cancer when screened regularly.
Burton Goldberg, in his book, Alternative
Medicine, recommends that women under 50 avoid
screening mammograms, although the American
Cancer Society encourages mammograms every two
years for women ages 40 to 49. Trying to settle this
debate, a 1997 consensus panel appointed by the NIH
ruled that there was no evidence that mammograms for
this age group save lives; they may even do more harm
than good. The panel advises women to weigh the risks
with their doctors
and decide for themselves.
New Screening Technologies
While screening is an important step in fighting breast
cancer, many researchers are looking for alternatives
to mammography. Burton Goldberg totes the safety and
accuracy of new thermography technologies. Able to
detect cancers
at a minute physical stage of development, thermography
does not use x-rays, nor is there any compression of
the breast. Also important, new thermography
technologies do not lose effectiveness with dense
breast tissue, decreasing the chances of false-negative
results.
Some doctors are now offering digital mammograms.
Digital mammography is a mammography system in which
x-ray film is replaced by solid-state detectors that
convert x-rays into electric signals. Though radiation
is still used, digital mammography requires a much
smaller dose. The electrical signals are used to
produce images that can be electronically manipulated;
a physician can zoom in, magnify and optimize different
parts of breast tissue without having to take an
additional image.
The experts speak on mammograms and breast cancer:
Regular mammography of younger women increases their
cancer risks. Analysis of controlled trials over the
last decade has shown consistent increases in breast
cancer mortality within a few years of commencing
screening. This confirms evidence of the high
sensitivity of the premenopausal breast, and on
cumulative carcinogenic effects of radiation.
The Politics Of Cancer by Samuel S Epstein MD,
page 539
In his book, "Preventing Breast Cancer,"
Dr. Gofinan says that breast cancer is the leading cause
of death among American women between the ages of
forty-four and fifty-five. Because breast tissue is
highly radiation-sensitive, mammograms can cause
cancer. The danger can be heightened by a woman's
genetic makeup, preexisting benign breast disease,
artificial menopause, obesity, and hormonal imbalance.
Death By Medicine by Gary Null PhD, page 23
"The risk of radiation-induced breast cancer
has long been a concern to mammographers and has driven
the efforts to minimize radiation dose per
examination," the panel explained. "Radiation
can cause breast cancer in women, and the risk is
proportional to dose. The younger the woman at the time
of exposure, the greater her lifetime risk for breast
cancer.
Under The Influence Modern Medicine by Terry A
Rondberg DC, page 122
Furthermore, there is clear evidence that the
breast, particularly in premenopausal women, is highly
sensitive to radiation, with estimates of increased
risk of breast cancer of up to 1% for every rad
(radiation absorbed dose) unit of X-ray exposure. This
projects up to a 20% increased cancer
risk for a woman who, in the 1970s, received 10
annual mammograms of an average two rads each. In spite
of this, up to 40% of women over 40 have had mammograms
since the mid-1960s, some annually and some with
exposures of 5 to 10 rads in a single screening from
older, high-dose equipment.
The Politics Of Cancer by Samuel S Epstein MD,
page 537
No less questionable—or controversial—has been
the use of X rays to detect breast cancer: mammography.
The American Cancer Society initially promoted the
procedure as a safe and simple way to detect breast
tumors early and thus allow women to undergo
mastectomies before their cancers had metastasized.
The Cancer Industry by Ralph W Moss, page 23
The American Cancer Society, together with the
American College of Radiologists, has insisted on
pursuing largescale mammography screening programs for
breast cancer, including its use in younger women, even
though the NCI and other experts are now agreed that
these are likely to cause more cancers than could
possibly be detected.
The Politics Of Cancer by Samuel S Epstein MD,
page 291
A number of "cancer societies" argued,
saying the tests — which cost between $50-200 each -
- are a necessity for all women over 40, despite the
fact that radiation from yearly mammograms during ages
40-49 has been estimated to cause one additional breast
cancer death per 10,000 women.
Under The Influence Modern Medicine by Terry A
Rondberg DC, page 21
Mammograms Add to Cancer Risk—mammography exposes
the breast to damaging ionizing radiation. John W.
Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., an authority on the health effects
of ionizing radiation, spent 30 years studying the
effects of low-dose radiation on humans. He estimates
that 75% of breast cancer could be prevented by
avoiding or minimizing exposure to the ionizing
radiation from mammography, X rays, and other medical
sources. Other research has shown that, since
mammographic screening was introduced in 1983, the
incidence of a form of breast cancer called ductal
carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which represents 12% of all
breast cancer cases, has increased by 328%, and 200% of
this increase is due to the use of mammography.69 In
addition to exposing a woman to harmful radiation, the
mammography procedure may help spread an existing mass
of cancer cells. During a mammogram, considerable
pressure must be placed on the woman's breast, as the
breast is squeezed between two flat plastic surfaces.
According to some health practitioners, this
compression could cause existing cancer cells to
metastasize from the breast tissue.
Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page
588
In fact the benefits of annual screening to women
age 40 to 50, who are now being aggressively recruited,
are at best controversial. In this age group, one in
four cancers is missed at each mammography. Over a
decade of pre-menopausal screening, as many as three in
10 women will be mistakenly diagnosed with breast
cancer. Moreover, international studies have shown that
routine premenopausal mammography is associated with
increased breast cancer death rates at older ages.
Factors involved include: the high sensitivity of the
premenopausal breast to the cumulative carcinogenic
effects of mammographic X-radiation; the still higher
sensitivity to radiation of women who carry the A-T
gene; and the danger that forceful and often painful
compression of the breast during mammography may
rupture small blood vessels and encourage distant
spread of undetected cancers.
The Politics Of Cancer by Samuel S Epstein MD,
page 540
Since a mammogram is basically an x-ray (radiation)
of the breast, I do not recommend mammograms to my
patients for two reasons: 1) Few radiologists
are able to read mammogams correctly, therefore
limiting their effectiveness. Even the man who
developed this technique stated on national television
that only about six radiologists in the United States
could read them correctly. 2) In addition, each time
the breasts are exposed to an x-ray, the risk of breast
cancer increases by 2 percent.
The Hope of Living Cancer Free by Francisco
Contreras MD, page 104
Mammography itself is radiation: an X-ray picture of
the breast to detect a potential tumor. Each woman must
weigh for herself the risks and benefits of
mammography. As with most carcinogens, there is a
latency period or delay between the time of irradiation
and the occurrence of breast cancer. This delay can
vary up to decades for different people. Response to
radiation is especially dramatic in children. Women who
received X-rays of the breast area as children have
shown increased rates of breast cancer as adults. The
first increase is reflected in women younger than
thirty-five, who have early onset breast cancer. But
for this exposed group, flourishing breast cancer rates
continue for another forty years or longer.
Eat To Beat Cancer by J Robert Hatherill, page
132
The use of women as guinea pigs is familiar. There
is revealing consistency between the tamoxifen trial
and the 1970s trial by the NCI and American Cancer
Society involving high-dose mammography of some 300,000
women. Not only is there little evidence of
effectiveness of mammography in premeno-pausal women,
despite NCI's assurances no warnings were given of the
known high risks of breast cancer from the excessive
X-ray doses then used. There has been no investigation
of the incidence of breast cancer in these high-risk
women. Of related concern is the NCI's continuing
insistence on premeno-pausal mammography, in spite of
contrary warnings by the American College of Physicians
and the Canadian Breast Cancer Task Force and in spite
of persisting questions about hazards even at current
low-dose exposures. These problems are compounded by
the NCI's failure to explore safe alternatives,
especially transillumination with infrared light
scanning.
The Politics Of Cancer by Samuel S Epstein MD,
page 544
High Rate of False Positives—mammography's high
rate of false-positive test results wastes money and
creates unnecessary emotional trauma. A Swedish study
of 60,000 women, aged 40-64, who were screened for
breast cancer revealed that of the 726 actually
referred to oncologists for treatment, 70% were found
to be cancer free. According to The
Lancet, of the 5% of mammograms that suggest
further testing, up to 93% are false positives. The
Lancet report further noted that because the great
majority of positive screenings are false positives,
these inaccurate results lead to many unnecessary
biopsies and other invasive surgical procedures. In
fact, 70% to 80% of all positive mammograms do not, on
biopsy, show any presence of cancer.71 According to
some estimates, 90% of these "callbacks"
result from unclear readings due to dense overlying
breast tissue.72
Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page
588
"Radiation-related breast cancers occur at
least 10 years after exposure," continued the
panel. "Radiation from yearly mammograms during
ages 40-49 has been estimated to cause one additional
breast cancer death per 10,000 women."
Under The Influence Modern Medicine by Terry A
Rondberg DC, page 122
According to the National Cancer Institute, there is
a high rate of missed tumors in women ages 40-49 which
results in 40% false negative test results. Breast
tissue in younger women is denser, which makes it more
difficult to detect tumours, so tumours grow more
quickly in younger women, and tumours may develop
between screenings. Because there is no reduction in
mortality from breast cancer as a direct result of
early mammogram, it is recommended that women under
fifty avoid screening mammograms although the American
Cancer Society still recommends a mammogram every two
years for women age 40-49. Dr. Love states, "We
know that mammography works and will be a lifesaving
tool for at least 30%."
Treating Cancer With Herbs by Michael Tierra ND,
page 467
Equivocal mammogram results lead to unnecessary
surgery, and the accuracy rate of mammograms is poor.
According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), in
women ages 40-49, there is a high rate of "missed
tumors," resulting in 40% false-negative mammogram
results. Breast tissue in younger women is denser,
which makes it more difficult to detect tumors, and
tumors grow more quickly in younger women, so cancer
may develop between screenings.
Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page
973
Even worse, spokespeople for the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) admit that mammograms miss 25 percent
of malignant tumors in women in their 40s (and 10
percent in older women). In fact, one Australian study
found that more than half of the breast cancers in
younger women are not detectable by mammograms.
Underground Cures by Health Sciences Institute,
page 42
Whatever you may be told, refuse routine mammograms
to detect early breast cancer, especially if you are
premenopausal. The X-rays may actually increase your
chances of getting cancer. If you are older, and there
are strong reasons to suspect that you may have breast
cancer, the risks may be worthwhile. Very few
circumstances, if any, should persuade you to have
X-rays taken if you are pregnant. The future risks of
leukaemia to your unborn
child, not to mention birth defects, are just not
worth it.
The Politics Of Cancer by Samuel S Epstein MD,
page 305
Other medical research has shown that the incidence
of a form of breast cancer known as ductal carcinoma in
situ (DCIS), which accounts for 12% of all breast
cancer cases, increased by 328% — and 200% of this
increase is due to the use of mammography!
Under The Influence Modern Medicine by Terry A
Rondberg DC, page 123
As the controversy heated up in 1976, it was
revealed that the hundreds of thousands of women
enrolled in the program were never told the risk they
faced from the procedure (ibid.). Young women faced the
greatest danger. In the thirty-five- to fifty-year-old
age group, each mammogram increased the subject's
chance of contracting breast cancer by 1 percent,
according to Dr. Frank Rauscher, then director of the
National Cancer Institute (New York Times, August 23,
1976).
The Cancer Industry by Ralph W Moss, page 24
Because there is no reduction in mortality from
breast cancer as a direct result of early mammograms,
it is recommended that women under 50 avoid screening
mammograms, although the American Cancer Society is
still recommending a mammogram every two years for
women ages 40-49. The NCI recommends that, after age
35, women perform monthly breast self-exams. For women
over 50, many doctors still advocate mammograms.
However, breast self-exams and safer, more accurate
technologies such as thermography should be strongly
considered as options to mammography.
Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page
973
In the midst of the debate, Kodak took out full-page
ads in scientific journals entitled "About breast
cancer and X-rays: A hopeful message from industry on a
sober topic" (see Science, July 2, 1976). Kodak is
a major manufacturer of mammography film.
The Cancer Industry by Ralph W Moss, page 24
The largest and most credible study ever done to
evaluate the impact of routine mammography on survival
has concluded that routine mammograms do significantly
reduce deaths from breast cancer. Scientists in the
United States, Sweden, Britain, and Taiwan compared the
number of deaths from breast cancer diagnosed in the 20
years before mammogram screening became available with
the number in the 20 years after its introduction. The
research was based on the histories and treatment of
210,000 Swedish women ages 20 to 69. The researchers
found that death from breast cancer dropped 44 percent
in women who had routine mammography. Among those who
refused mammograms during this time period there was
only a 16 percent reduction in death from this disease
(presumably the decrease was due to better treatment of
the malignancy).
Dr Isadore Rosenfeld's Breakthrough Health By
Isadore Rosenfeld MD, page 47
In 1993—seventeen years after the first pilot
study—the biochemist Mary Wolff and her colleagues
conducted the first carefully designed, major study on
this issue. They analyzed DDE and PCB levels in the
stored blood specimens of 14,290 New York City women
who had attended a mammography screening clinic. Within
six months, fifty-eight of these women were diagnosed
with breast cancer. Wolff matched each of these
fifty-eight women to control subjects—women without
cancer but of the same age, same menstrual status, and
so on—who had also visited the clinic. The blood
samples of the women with breast cancer were then
compared to their cancer-free counterparts.
Living Downstream by Sandra Steingraber PhD,
page 12
One reason may be that mammograms actually increase
mortality. In fact numerous studies to date have shown
that among the under-50s, more women die from breast
cancer among screened groups than among those not given
mammograms. The results of the Canadian National Breast
Cancer Screening Trial published in 1993, after a
screen of 50,000 women between 40-49, showed that more
tumors were detected in the screened group, but not
only were no lives saved but 36 percent more women died
from
The Cancer Handbook by Lynne McTaggart, page 57
One Canadian study found a 52 percent increase in
breast cancer mortality in young women given annual
mammograms, a procedure whose stated purpose is to
prevent cancer. Despite evidence of the link between
cancer and radiation exposure to women from
mammography, the American Cancer Society has promoted
the practice without reservation. Five radiologists
have served as ACS presidents.53
When Healing Becomes A Crime by Kenny Ausubel,
page 233
Premenopausal women carrying the A-T gene, about 1.5
percent of women, are more radiation sensitive and at
higher cancer risk from mammography. It has been
estimated that up to 10,000 breast cancer cases each
year are due to mammography of A-T carriers.
The Politics Of Cancer by Samuel S Epstein MD,
page 539
A study reported that mammography combined with
physical exams found 3,500 cancers, 42 percent of which
could not be detected by physical exam. However, 31
percent of the tumors were noninfiltrating cancer.
Since the course of breast cancer is long, the time
difference in cancer detected through mammography may
not be a benefit in terms of survival.
Woman's Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Dr
Gary Null, page 86
The American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists also has called for more mammograms among
women over 50. However, constant screening still can
miss breast cancer. mammograms are at their poorest in
detecting breast cancer when the woman is under 50.
The Cancer Handbook by Lynne McTaggart, page 53
Despite its shortcomings, every woman between the
ages of fifty and sixty-nine should have one every
year. I also recommend them annually for women over
seventy, even though early detection isn't as important
for the slow-growing form of breast cancer they tend to
get. One mammogram should probably be taken at age
forty to establish a baseline, but how often women
should have them after that is debatable. Some
authorities favor annual screening. Others feel there's
not enough evidence to support screening at all before
fifty. Still others believe that every two years is
sufficient. I lean toward having individual women and
their doctors go over the pros and cons and make their
own decisions. Finally, a mammogram is appropriate at
any age if a lump has been detected.
The Longevity Code By Zorba Paster MD, page 234 For
breast cancer, thermography offers a very early warning
system, often able to pinpoint a cancer process five
years before it would be detectable by mammography.
Most breast tumors have been growing slowly for up to
20 years before they are found by typical diagnostic
techniques. Thermography can detect cancers when they
are at a minute physical stage of development, when it
is still relatively easy to halt and reverse the
progression of the cancer. No rays of any kind enter
the patient's body; there is no pain or compressing of
the breasts as in a mammogram. While mammography tends
to lose effectiveness with dense breast tissue,
thermography is not dependent upon tissue densities.
Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page
587
Originally published
August 15 2005
|
| 67 |
Aspirin 'prevents bowel cancer'
Taking aspirin each day can prevent bowel cancer
developing, a study says.
Oxford University researchers said taking a dose of
300mg a day for five years offered the protection.
Long-term aspirin use is generally not backed because
of the risk of stomach problems, but the team said it
could benefit those at high-risk of cancer.
Cancer campaigners welcomed the study - published in
the Lancet - which examined data from previous research
covering more than 7,500 people.
These findings are not an indication that the general
population should rush out and take what is a high
dosage of aspirin on a daily basis.
Rob Glynne-Jones
Bowel Cancer UK
Each year, around 35,000 men and women in the UK are
diagnosed with bowel cancer, and more than 16,000 die
from the disease.
The researchers looked at the results from two
large-scale UK trials carried out in the late 1970s and
early 1980s covering over 7,500 people which had given
some people 300, 500 or 1,200mg per day doses of
aspirin or a dummy pill for five to seven years.
The people in the study were then followed for up to 20
years, and deaths from bowel cancer were logged.
The team say it takes at least 10 years to see an
effect, because that is how long it takes for a
pre-cancerous growths to develop into cancer.
Other studies have examined aspirin's benefits.
However, this was the first where people were allocated
to take different doses of the drug, or the fake
version, rather than looking back at the aspirin use of
bowel cancer patients and comparing them with healthy
people.
High risk group 'benefit'
The researchers found that taking 300mg of aspirin -
the equivalent of one pill - a day for five years
reduced the incidence of bowel cancer by 74% in the
subsequent 10 to 15 years.
An accompanying review of 30 observational studies
suggested taking medium-to-high doses of aspirin for 10
years or more reduced the risk of developing the
disease by 50%-70%.
The protective effect of aspirin appeared to be
consistent regardless of age, sex, race or country of
origin.
It was also seen in individuals who had a close family
relative with bowel cancer, which normally raises the
lifetime risk two to four times.
Professor Peter Rothwell, who led the research, said:
"What we are saying is that for a subgroup of
people at high risk of bowel cancer, they probably
aren't going to be dramatically harmed by taking
aspirin.
"They may have some risk of bleeding in the
stomach, but they will see potentially significant
benefits in the reduction of their colon cancer risk.
"In that situation, I think taking aspirin daily
would be worthwhile."
Warning
Dr Andrew Chan, from Massachusetts General Hospital in
Boston, writing in the Lancet, said the findings were
"convincing evidence" that aspirin can reduce
the incidence of bowel cancer.
But he added: "With the concerns about the
potential risks of long-term aspirin use and the
availability of alternative prevention strategies -
such as screening - these findings are not sufficient
to warrant a recommendation for the general population
to use aspirin for cancer prevention."
Rob Glynne-Jones, chief medical advisor to the charity
Bowel Cancer UK, said: "This is very interesting
and it certainly confirms what we already know and
believe about the links between aspirin, polyps and the
development of bowel cancer.
"However, these findings are not an indication
that the general population should rush out and take
what is a high dosage of aspirin on a daily basis.
"Aspirin at this dose over a prolonged period of
time could lead to potentially serious side effects in
a few people."
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/6643547.stm
Published: 2007/05/10 23:01:24 GMT
© BBC MMVII
|
| 68 |
Hot water kills dust mites
Posted on May 28, 2007 7:06:00 AM
Washing your laundry in hot water - 140 degrees
Fahrenheit - completely eliminates allergy-aggravating
dust mites (image left), according to new
research. Don't like the added expense of using hot
water? Well, you could do a double-rinse of cold water
and get pretty good results. The study was conducted by
South Korean researchers, who presented their data at a
recent meeting of the American
Thoracic Society.
|
| 69 |
Court Begins Hearings on Vaccine Link
to Autism
Monday , June 11, 2007
The parents of 12-year-old Michelle Cedillo asked a
federal court Monday to find that their child's autism
was caused by common childhood vaccines, a
precedent-setting case that could pave the way for
thousands of autistic children to receive compensation
from a government fund set up to help people injured by
the shots.
Wearing noise-canceling headphones, Michelle, of Yuma,
Ariz., was brought into the courtroom in a wheelchair
at the start of the proceedings before the U.S. Court
of Federal Claims. She stayed only a short time.
Her parents, Theresa and Michael Cedillo, allege a
preservative called thimerosal that had been used in
vaccines weakened their daughter's immune system and
prevented her body from clearing the measles virus
after she was immunized for the disease at age 15
months.
Today, Michelle suffers from a litany of health
problems, including severe autism, inflammatory bowel
disease, glaucoma and epilepsy.
"We hope to find out what happened and hopefully
get the help she needs," said Theresa Cedillo, who
takes care of her daughter full time at home.
Special Master George Hastings Jr. thanked the family
for allowing theirs to be the first of nine test cases
that will help guide the resolution of some of the
nearly 5,000 similar claims lodged with the government.
"Clearly the story of Michelle's life is a tragic
one," Hastings said in pledging to listen
carefully to the evidence presented during the
three-week hearing.
The burden of proof is easier than in a traditional
court. Plaintiffs only have to prove that a link
between autism and the shots is more likely than not,
based on a preponderance of evidence.
Large scientific studies have found no association
between autism and vaccines containing thimerosal.
But many parents say their children's symptoms did not
show up until after their children received the
vaccines, required by many states for admission to
school.
"These are families who followed the rules. These
are families who brought children in for vaccines.
These are families who immunized their children,"
said the Cedillos' attorney, Thomas Powers.
Powers said that the science regarding a possible
vaccine-autism link is in dispute.
Government attorney Vincent Matanoski dismissed much of
what the plaintiffs are expected to present as
conjecture or speculation.
"You'll find their hypotheses untested or, when
tested, have been found false," Matanoski said.
Since 1999, more than 4,800 families have filed claims
with the government alleging their children developed
autism as a result of routine vaccinations. Most
contend that a preservative called thimerosal is to
blame for the impaired social interaction typical of
the disorder.
The court is being asked to decide whether there is a
link between autism and childhood vaccines. If it finds
one exists, the families could be eligible for
compensation under the Vaccine Injury Compensation
Fund, a program established by Congress to ensure an
adequate supply of vaccines by safeguarding
manufacturers from lawsuits. Under the program, people
injured by vaccines receive compensation through a
special trust fund.
Autism is characterized by impaired social interaction.
Those affected often have trouble communicating, and
they exhibit unusual or severely limited activities and
interests. Classic symptoms of mercury poisoning
include anxiety, fatigue and abnormal irritation, as
well as cognitive and motor dysfunction.
Monday's case addresses the theory that the cause of
autism is the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in
combination with other vaccines containing thimerosal.
The preservative, about 50 percent mercury by weight,
is no longer found in routine childhood vaccines but is
used in some flu shots.
In July 1999, the U.S. government asked vaccine
manufacturers to eliminate or reduce, as expeditiously
as possible, the mercury content of their vaccines to
avoid any possibility of infants who receive vaccines
being exposed to more mercury than is recommended by
federal guidelines.
Copyright 2007 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights
reserved.
|
| 70 |
CANCER UPDATE FROM JOHN HOPKINS
HOSPITAL
1. Every person has cancer cells in
the body. These cancer cells do not show up in the
standard tests until they have multiplied to a few
billion.
When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no
more cancer cells in their bodies after treatment, it
just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer
cells because they have not reached the detectable size
2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times
in a person's lifetime.
3. When the person's immune system is strong the cancer
cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying
and forming tumours.
4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has
multiple nutritional deficiencies. These could be due
to genetic, environmental, food and lifestyle factors.
5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies,
changing diet and including supplements will strengthen
the immune system.
6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing
cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy
cells in the bone marrow, gastro-intestinal tract etc,
and can cause organ damage, like liver,kidneys, heart,
lungs etc.
7. Radiation, while destroying cancer cells, also
burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and
organs.
8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation
will often reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of
chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor
destruction.
9. When the body has too much toxic burden from
chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either
compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb
to various kinds of infections and complications.
10. Chemotherapy and radiation can cause cancer cells
to mutate and become resistant and difficult to
destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread
to other sites.
11. An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the
cancer cells by not feeding it with the foods it needs
to multiply.
CANCER CELLS FEED ON:
a. Sugar is a cancer-feeder. By cutting off
sugar it cuts off one important food supply to the
cancer cells. Sugar substitutes like NutraSweet,
Equal,Spoonful, etc are made with Aspartame and it is
harmful. A better natural substitute would be Manuka
honey or molasses but only in very small amounts.
Stevia is the best, natural sweetner. Table salt has a
chemical added to make it white in colour. Better
alternative is Bragg's aminos or sea salt.
b. Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in
the gastro-intestinal tract. Cancer feeds on mucus. By
cutting off milk and substituting with unsweetened soya
milk cancer cells are being starved.
c. Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A
meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish,
and a little chicken rather than beef or pork. Meat
also contains livestock antibiotics, growth hormones
and parasites, which are all harmful, especially to
people with cancer.
d. A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole
grains,seeds, nuts and a little fruits help put the
body into an alkaline environment.
About 20% can be from cooked food including beans.
Fresh vegetable juices provide live enzymes that are
easily absorbed and reach down to cellular levels
within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance growth of
healthy cells. To obtain live enzymes for building
healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice (most
vegetables including bean sprouts)and eat some raw
vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at
temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C).
e. Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate, which have high
caffeine.Green tea is a better alternative and has
cancer-fighting properties.
Water-best to drink purified water, or filtered, to
avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap water.
Distilled water is acidic, avoid it.
12. Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a
lot of digestive enzymes. Undigested meat remaining in
the intestines become putrefied and leads to more toxic
buildup.
13. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By
refraining from or eating less meat it frees more
enzymes to attack the protein walls of cancer cells and
allows the body's killer cells to destroy the cancer
cells.
14. Some supplements build up the immune system (IP6,
Flor-ssence,Essiac, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals,
EFAs etc.) to enable the body's own killer cells to
destroy cancer cells. Other supplements, like vitamin
E, are known to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell
death, the body's normal method of disposing of
damaged, unwanted, or unneeded cells.
15. Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit.
A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer
warrior be a survivor. Anger, unforgiveness and
bitterness put the body into a stressful and acidic
environment. Learn to have a loving and forgiving
spirit. Learn to relax and enjoy life.
16. Cancer cells cannot thrive in an oxygenated
environment. Exercising daily, and deep breathing help
to get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen
therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer
cells.
PLEASE FORWARD IT TO PEOPLE YOU CARE ABOUT CANCER
UPDATE FROM JOHN
HOPKINS HOSPITAL , U S - PLEASE READ
1. No plastic containers in micro.
2. No water bottles in freezer.
3. No plastic wrap in microwave.
Johns Hopkins has recently sent this out in its
newsletters. This information is being circulated at
Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well.
Dioxin chemicals causes cancer, especially breast
cancer.
Dioxins are highly poisonous to the cells of our
bodies.
Don't freeze your plastic bottles with water in them as
this releases dioxins from the plastic.
Recently, Dr. Edward Fujimoto, Wellness Program Manager
at Castle Hospital , was on a TV program to explain
this health hazard.
He talked about dioxins and how bad they are for us.
He said that we should not be heating our food in the
microwave using plastic containers. Best not to use
microwave at all, causes radiation damage.
This especially applies to foods that contain fat.
He said that the combination of fat, high heat, and
plastics releases dioxin into the food and ultimately
into the cells of the body.
Instead, he recommends using glass, such as Corning
Ware, Pyrex or ceramic containers for heating food. You
get the same results, only without the dioxin. So such
things as TV dinners, instant ramen and soups, etc.,
should be removed from the container and heated in
something else.
Paper isn't bad but you don't know what is in the
paper.
It's just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware,
etc.
He reminded us that a while ago some of the fast food
restaurants moved away from the foam containers to
paper.
The dioxin problem is one of the reasons.
Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran,
is just as dangerous when placed over foods to be
cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high
heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of
the plastic wrap and drip into the food.
Cover food with a paper towel instead.
This is an article that should be sent to anyone
important in your life
|
| 71 |
Caution: Some soft drinks may seriously harm your
health
Expert links additive to cell damage
By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent
Published: 27 May 2007
A new health scare erupted over soft drinks last night
amid evidence they may cause serious cell damage.
Research from a British university suggests a common
preservative found in drinks such as Fanta and Pepsi
Max has the ability to switch off vital parts of DNA.
The problem - more usually associated with ageing and
alcohol abuse - can eventually lead to cirrhosis of the
liver and degenerative diseases such as Parkinson's.
The findings could have serious consequences for the
hundreds of millions of people worldwide who consume
fizzy drinks. They will also intensify the controversy
about food additives, which have been linked to
hyperactivity in children.
Concerns centre on the safety of E211, known as sodium
benzoate, a preservative used for decades by the £74bn
global carbonated drinks industry. Sodium benzoate
derives from benzoic acid. It occurs naturally in
berries, but is used in large quantities to prevent
mould in soft drinks such as Sprite, Oasis and Dr
Pepper. It is also added to pickles and sauces.
Sodium benzoate has already been the subject of concern
about cancer because when mixed with the additive
vitamin C in soft drinks, it causes benzene, a
carcinogenic substance. A Food Standards Agency survey
of benzene in drinks last year found high levels in
four brands which were removed from sale.
Now, an expert in ageing at Sheffield University, who
has been working on sodium benzoate since publishing a
research paper in 1999, has decided to speak out about
another danger. Professor Peter Piper, a professor of
molecular biology and biotechnology, tested the impact
of sodium benzoate on living yeast cells in his
laboratory. What he found alarmed him: the benzoate was
damaging an important area of DNA in the "power
station" of cells known as the mitochondria.
He told The Independent on Sunday: "These
chemicals have the ability to cause severe damage to
DNA in the mitochondria to the point that they totally
inactivate it: they knock it out altogether.
"The mitochondria consumes the oxygen to give you
energy and if you damage it - as happens in a number if
diseased states - then the cell starts to malfunction
very seriously. And there is a whole array of diseases
that are now being tied to damage to this DNA -
Parkinson's and quite a lot of neuro-degenerative
diseases, but above all the whole process of
ageing."
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) backs the use of sodium
benzoate in the UK and it has been approved by the
European Union but last night, MPs called for it to
investigate urgently.
Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat chair of
Parliament's all-party environment group said:
"Many additives are relatively new and their
long-term impact cannot be certain. This preservative
clearly needs to be investigated further by the
FSA."
A review of sodium benzoate by the World Health
Organisation in 2000 concluded that it was safe, but it
noted that the available science supporting its safety
was "limited".
Professor Piper, whose work has been funded by a
government research council, said tests conducted by
the US Food and Drug Administration were out of date.
"The food industry will say these compounds have
been tested and they are complete safe," he said.
"By the criteria of modern safety testing, the
safety tests were inadequate. Like all things, safety
testing moves forward and you can conduct a much more
rigorous safety test than you could 50 years ago."
He advised parents to think carefully about buying
drinks with preservatives until the quantities in
products were proved safe by new tests. "My
concern is for children who are drinking large
amounts," he said.
Coca-Cola and Britvic's Pepsi Max and Diet Pepsi all
contain sodium benzoate. Their makers and the British
Soft Drinks Association said they entrusted the safety
of additives to the Government.
|
| 72 |
Report: Soda May Seriously Harm Your Health
Sunday , May 27, 2007
You may want to put that soda can down.
A common preservative found in drinks such as
Coca-Cola, Sprite, Dr. Pepper, Fanta and Diet Pepsi and
may cause serious cell damage, according to a report in
Britain's The Independent.
Sodium benzoate has the ability to switch off vital
parts of a person's DNA, according to research from a
British university.
The problem is usually associated with aging and
alcohol abuse, but new findings show that drinking soda
with the preservative can eventually lead to cirrhosis
of the liver and degenerative diseases such as
Parkinson's.
Click here to read the full story in The Independent.
Sodium benzoate, which derives from benzoic acid, has
been used for years by the carbonated drinks industry
to prevent mold from developing in soft drinks. The
ingredient has been the subject of concern on cancer,
because when mixed with Vitamin C, it turns into a
carcinogenic substance called benzene, the Independent
reported.
Last year, a Food Standards Agency survey of benzene in
drinks found high levels in four brands that were
removed from store shelves.
"These chemicals have the ability to cause severe
damage to DNA in the mitochondria to the point that
they totally inactivate it: they knock it out
altogether," said Peter Piper, a professor of
molecular biology and biotechnology.
|
| 73 |
Feeling lethargic, moody, tired, fat? It could be
your thyroid
POSTED: 10:16 a.m. EDT, May 10, 2007
By Melanie Haiken
Health.com
Most people say they're tired when they skip their
morning run or nod off during their favorite 9 o'clock
sitcom. But if you want to know about real
bone-crunching fatigue, the kind that chains you to
your bed, ask someone with a thyroid disorder.
For me, the exhaustion was totally out of character.
I'd always been high-energy, even a tad hyper. Six
hours of sleep a night was enough. Then last fall I
became a different person, someone I didn't like very
much at all.
I'd get up at 7:15 and see my 13-year-old out the door,
then lie down. Next thing I knew it was 8 a.m. and
there were a mere 10 minutes left to get my 10-year-old
fed and to school. As if her tardies weren't bad
enough, I started crawling back into bed again after I
dropped her off. Suddenly there weren't enough hours in
the day to earn the living that supported us all.
Though I mentioned the problem to my doctor, all he did
was offer sleeping pills. But then my younger sister
discovered she had a thyroid problem, and her doctor
said it runs in families. (Health.com: Why thyroid
disorders are so common )
I read a list of the possible symptoms -- exhaustion,
depression, constipation, hair loss, and heavy periods,
among others -- and all the pieces began to fall into
place. I have hypothyroidism. I share the disorder with
millions of Americans, most of them women. And today,
in many ways, I'm luckier than most. Thanks to my
symptoms and a family history, my doctor put me on
thyroid medication.
Now, at 44, I'm back to my usual self. My fatigue and
constipation are gone and my eyebrows are growing back.
I'm lucky. Millions of people aren't getting the help
they deserve. You may be one of them.
A thyroid epidemic?
The Colorado Thyroid Disease Prevalence Study,
published in 2000, found that as much as 10 percent of
the population may have a thyroid disorder, and as many
as half of those cases were thought to be undiagnosed.
Six years later, that's considered a conservative
estimate. Some experts say a woman over 35 has a 30
percent chance of developing hypothyroidism. When I
tell people about my condition, the room echoes. They
say they have it, too, or report that a friend or
family member does. (Health.com: Feeling sluggish? Try
sushi )
What's going on?
New thinking seems to be uncovering many more people
who suffer from hypothyroidism -- happy news, assuming
they get treated. For decades the disorder has usually,
but not always, been diagnosed with a blood test, a
good place to start if you think you may have it (see
"How to Find Answers," at right). In recent
years the American Association of Clinical
Endocrinologists recommended narrowing the so-called
normal range for blood-test scores, catching millions
more whose thyroid issues wouldn't have been diagnosed
otherwise. Even if your results fail to flag a problem,
you may still have symptoms and be a candidate for
treatment. (Health.com: Help for hypothyroidism )
Hello, sluggishness
Your thyroid is a tiny, butterfly-shaped gland at the
base of your neck. Sometimes described as the body's
thermostat, it controls energy flow. Hypothyroidism,
also called low thyroid, means the gland isn't
producing enough hormones to do its job. The most
frequent cause is Hashimoto's thyroiditis, a condition
that causes your body to produce antibodies that attack
the thyroid. A shortage of thyroid hormones makes you
sluggish at every level.
Slowed digestion causes constipation, sluggish
metabolism leads to weight gain and elevated
cholesterol, even hair and skin can become dry and
coarse (and hair can fall out) because they're not
getting enough nutrients. The brain also needs thyroid
hormones to use oxygen and stimulate the production of
chemicals like serotonin and dopamine that regulate
emotions. That's why hypothyroidism can lead to
depression and moodiness, not to mention the fuzzy
thinking that nearly every thyroid patient complains
about. Other symptoms, such as heavy periods, cramps,
and a queasy stomach, are trickier for doctors to
connect to an underactive thyroid. (Health.com: Making
sense of medical tests)
Most of these symptoms may sound familiar--it's not
unusual for a 30-, 40-, or 50-something woman to feel
tired, bummed out, and a little bit overweight -- and
this makes hypothyroidism that much harder to diagnose.
In many cases, doctors assume a woman is simply going
through perimenopause or suffering mild depression.
"It's all too common for a doctor to hear 'tired,
moody, forgetful' and offer the patient a prescription
for antidepressants," says Richard Shames, M.D.,
of San Rafael, California, a thyroid specialist.
There are few things more frustrating than getting the
wrong treatment. My younger sister was told to take
antacids for her nausea. Doctors didn't immediately
recognize her hypothyroidism in part because she's thin
and didn't feel tired. "It was awful," she
says. "My husband would cook us a great dinner,
I'd eat one bite and feel so sick I'd have to crawl
into bed."
After doing her own research and insisting that her
doctor give her a relatively new kind of test, my
sister got an accurate diagnosis. It took a while to
get the right dosage of medication, and that's not
uncommon. (Treatment usually consists of replacement
hormones.) But the nausea is gone now.
Good-bye, desperation
"I've seen so many patients come in with the same
story," says Stephen E. Langer, M.D., a thyroid
specialist in Berkeley, California. "From their
symptoms, it's clear that their thyroid is underactive.
But either it doesn't show up on standard tests, so
their previous doctor refused to prescribe medication,
or they are on medication but it's not working."
The desperation seems all the more unjust when you
realize that being treated can be a life-affirming
event. My friend Cathryn Jakobson Ramin, 49, a fellow
writer from Mill Valley, California, is a wonderful
example. A few years ago, she noticed that her hands
and feet were always cold, her hair was falling out,
and her memory was increasingly iffy. After a few years
of being told her thyroid tests were normal, Cathryn
found her way to a specialist. Once treated, she
noticed a huge improvement in her memory.
At a recent party where hypothyroidism came up in
conversation, several friends described unsuccessful
attempts to get treated for symptoms that seemed
suspiciously hypothyroid, while others raved about how
much better they felt taking thyroid medication.
Cathryn came up to the group, listened for a moment,
then announced, "They should put it in the
water."
|
| 74 |
Other Ways to Beat Eczema
In our last health alert, I told you about an exciting
new prescription drug that can improve and, in some
cases, eliminate eczema. I usually don't get excited
about prescription drugs. But this may be one that will
help. However, there are other excellent ways to treat
this irritating skin condition. In most cases, I would
try these before getting the prescription.
The first one was also recommended by the researcher
who discovered PEA, the prescription drug. Dr. Rebecca
Smith also prescribes one of my favorite treatments -
though I doubt she knows what it is. She suggests
adding one-eighth cup of bleach to a half-full bath
tub. Then soak in it for 15 minutes twice a week.
I was shocked to hear her recommend this treatment.
Why? Because this treatment is actually an oxidative
bath. Bleach is very similar to hydrogen peroxide.
There are even formulations that can be given
intravenously and orally (only from your integrative
physician). Dr. Smith recommends the baths to prevent
or treat infections. Bleach contains the powerful
oxidant sodium hypochlorite, a compound made by your
infection-fighting white blood cells to kill bacteria.
Another way to heal your skin is with shea butter. The
oil comes from shea nuts, another powerful hydrating
agent. It's available in health food stores.
Action to take: If you have eczema, first eliminate
common food allergens. These include dairy, corn,
wheat, peanuts, eggs, and chocolate. That alone could
go a long way to easing the itch. Consider evening
primrose oil (two capsules twice daily) supplements to
provide your skin with the much needed omega-6 fatty
acids.
Then replace your steroid creams with non-steroidal
creams like MimyX (available at most pharmacies with a
prescription) or shea butter. These won't damage and
thin the collagen in your skin.
As for the weekly oxidation baths, they cost almost
nothing. Bleach is very cheap. And it's definitely
worth trying. In fact, I recommend these baths for
periodic use for just about everyone - not just when
you get skin infections. They're great for routine
immune maintenance.
If these don't work, then ask your doctor for a
prescription for PEA. You'll find amazing relief if you
follow this treatment regimen. In fact, most eczema
sufferers will see their skin clear up completely.
Yours for better health and medical freedom,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
|
| 75 |
Low cholesterol 'link' to cancer
People who significantly cut their cholesterol
levels with statins may raise the risk of cancer, a
study says.
The study of 40,000 people found those with little
of the "bad" cholesterol LDL saw one more
cancer case per 1,000 than those with higher levels.
The Boston-based researchers could not say if this
was a side-effect of the statin or due to the low
cholesterol.
They also write in the Journal of the American
College of Cardiology that the benefits of statins
outweigh the risks.
"The analysis doesn't implicate the statin in
increasing the risk of cancer," says lead author
Richard Karas of Tufts University School of Medicine in
Boston. "The demonstrated benefits of statins in
lowering the risk of heart disease remain clear.
"However certain aspects of lowering LDL with
statins remain controversial and merit further
research."
Reservations
Researchers looked at the summary data from 13
trials of people taking statins - a total of 41,173
patients.
| |
These findings do not change the message that
the benefits of taking statins greatly outweigh
any potential risks
British Heart Foundation |
They examined the relationship between low, medium
and high doses of statins and rates of newly diagnosed
cancer.
Higher rates of the disease - which were not of any
type or location - were observed in the group with the
lower levels.
The authors noted their findings were particularly
important at a time when more and more trials show
significant reductions in LDL levels can greatly
benefit cardiovascular health.
Cancer Research UK was wary of the study.
Cancer information officer Dr Alison Ross said:
"The findings of this study should be treated with
caution - it is based on summary data from previous
trials and, as the authors point out themselves, it
does not prove that low LDL cholesterol levels can
increase cancer risk.
"Much more research is needed before any firm
conclusions can be made."
The British Heart Foundation said they had long
known of a relationship between low cholesterol and
cancer.
"While this highlights an association between
low levels of LDL and cancer, this is not the same as
saying that low LDL or statin use increases the risk of
cancer," said June Davison, cardiac nurse.
"There is overwhelming evidence that lowering
LDL cholesterol through statins saves lives by
preventing heart attacks and strokes. These findings do
not change the message that the benefits of taking
statins greatly outweigh any potential risks."
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/6911530.stm
Published: 2007/07/24 00:44:22 GMT
© BBC MMVII
|
| 76 |
OT: re "Dr." Barrett of
Quackwatch/Quackbuster
FYI as we've had lots of discussions about Barrett over
the years. I received this from Ted Koren's office re
their lawsuit with Barrett.
Barrett Loses Appeal, Leaves Town
Self proclaimed Quackbuster, Stephen Barrett, MD,
recently handed crushing defeats by chiropractor Tedd
Koren and Ilena Rosenthal, has announced he is leaving
his home town and operating base in Allentown,
Pennsylvania.
On June 11th, 2007, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania
affirmed a lower court dismissal of Barrett's
defamation suite against Dr. Koren. Barrett's case was
so lacking in merit the judge blocked it from going to
the jury. Barrett simply had no case against Dr. Koren.
This followed another stunning defeat last month in
California. There an appeals court ordered Barrett and
crony Terry Polevoy, MD to post bonds of more than
$400,000.00 after they lost a defamation case against
Illena Rosenthal virtually identical to the Koren case.
Perhaps the fact that lawyers and judges in Allentown
are catching on to his intimidation schemes explains
why Barrett is moving to Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Barrett can run but he can't hide. Chapel Hill
collection attorneys are already being asked to locate
his assets to pay his unmet legal obligations. Assets
of other Quackwatch, Inc., principals might also be
sought.
Who Is Steven Barrett, What Are Quackbusters?
Steven Barrett is an unlicensed Pennsylvania
psychiatrist, who, though he failed his psychiatric
boards and has been criticized for his lack of
expertise by several courts, still claims to often
advise the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), the FBI, State Attorneys
General, HMOs, Consumer Reports, medical journals and
state medical, chiropractic and dental boards.
The insurance industry cites Barrett's highly
opinionated "Quackbuster" attacks to deny
paying claims for chiropractic and other natural
healthcare.
Barrett and the "Quackbusters," a vigilante
group of self proclaimed skeptics of any medical or
health modality that avoids drugs, surgery or
radiation, attack almost all non-conventional
healthcare practices as quackery. Ignoring all
scientific research to the contrary, they dismiss Gulf
War Syndrome, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Chemical
Sensitivity, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and dietary
supplements as rubbish. Double Nobel Prize winner Linus
Pauling is on their "quack" hit list along
with many well known and respected doctors and
scientists, including Deepak Chopra, Andrew Weil, and
dozens of others.
Barrett claims to give over 500 interviews a year to
newspapers, magazines, and television shows, including
CNN and the Today Show. He claims to have been a peer
reviewer for seven medical journals, including the
Journal of the American Medical Association, even
though he had no license to practice medicine when he
did the reviewing.
The Quackbusters run over 70 websites. Millions of
people go to them every year. Look up chiropractic,
acupuncture, homeopathy or even vitamin C, as well as
almost every other natural health topic, on the
Internet and you (and the public) will be led to
Quackbuster sites advising you of natural health
"dangers." In all these forums Barrett and
the Quackbusters relentlessly attack the consumer right
to informed choice. These activities continue the AMA's
anti-quackery committee's activities that were struck
down by federal courts as an illegal restraint of trade
in a landmark lawsuit brought by Illinois chiropractor
Chester Wilk. They also help insurance companies deny
consumer reimbursement claims.
At the same time, Barrett flacks for products like
aspartame (NutraSweet), which is the subject of tens of
thousands of consumer complaints. Question (asked on
Barrett's web site): "An email message is being
circulated with many statements to the effect that
aspartame is dangerous. How worried should I be?"
Answer (from Barrett): "Not at all. The message is
pure rubbish."
What Did Dr. Koren Do to Provoke Barrett's
Shakedown?
Dr. Tedd Koren is a well-known chiropractor,
researcher, writer and lecturer. Barrett sued Dr. Koren
in 2003 for calling him a Quackpot, saying he was in
big trouble because of a racketeering law suit brought
against him and attacking his lack of a medical license
in his internet newsletter.
The trial judge and three appeals judges agreed
unanimously that these statements were so far from
defamation that no jury could be legally allowed to
call them defamation. Dr. Koren also said Barrett was
"delicensed." One of the three appeals courts
judges thought a jury might be able to find this to be
defamation. However two appellate judges disagreed and
jurors interviewed after the trial said they too saw
through Barrett and felt that he was a litigious,
ungrounded and biased denier of the truth.
In part jurors formed this view because Barrett
testified with great self-satisfaction in the Koren
case that he had sued many doctors-close to forty-in
similar cases, demanding up to $100,000 if they wished
to avoid a costly lawsuit. Some paid-how many is yet to
be discovered. Drs. Koren and Rosenthal and a few
others did not. Barrett has failed to win a single
lawsuit in this shakedown scheme.
Dr. Koren's Legal Team
Well known consumer advocate, James S. (Jim) Turner,
general counsel to Koren Publications, who several
years earlier had persuaded the FTC to drop an
investigation against Dr. Koren (brought at a time when
Barrett was a consultant to the FTC), organized and
coordinated the legal team that represented Dr. Koren.
Attorney Christopher Reid of Allentown, Pennsylvania
acted as associate trial counsel and appellate counsel
and California health freedom attorney Carlos Negrete
acted as trial counsel.,
Mr. Negrete said, "Fortunately for all of his
colleagues, Dr. Koren decided not to back down and took
the case to trial. Barrett is part of a group of
intolerant individuals. I am not certain who the
supporters of the so-called Quackbusters are, but they
seem to me to be just skinheads with
stethoscopes."
During heated and often dramatic courtroom proceedings,
Mr. Negrete pointed out many of the questionable
statements Barrett includes on his websites attacking
chiropractic, as well as facts about Barrett's own
credentials that shocked even his supporters.
Mr. Turner says, "It is very important that a very
responsible judge in Barrett's hometown recognized that
he was making false allegations and dismissed the case.
Barrett has cost untoward numbers of consumers pain,
anguish and probably serious harm by his
misrepresentation of the facts about subjects ranging
from acupuncture to zinc."
Mr. Turner, who among other campaigns led the team that
got acupuncture needles approved as safe by FDA, worked
with a Senate committee to abolish the dysfunctional
vaccine regulatory agency, worked with whistleblowers
to stop the Swine Flu inoculation campaign, kept
aspartame off the market for ten years, and played a
key role in lobbying the Organic Food Production Act
through Congress (all areas on which the Foundation for
Health Choice focuses), says, "Our objective is to
end Barrett's abuse of consumers by eliminating the
false and misleading information from his website and
his entire network of websites and replacing it with
sound, useful information for consumers."
Says Dr. Koren, "This is just the beginning. Just
as the FTC battle was not about Tedd Koren alone but
had ramifications for the entire chiropractic and
natural health professions so the Barrett v. Koren
battle will have major ramifications for all. We're
going to give the Quackbusters a taste of their own
medicine. They'll learn how dangerous medicine can
be."
"Our mission is not just about revealing the
Quackbusters to be the unscientific bigots that they
are. We are fighting for health care freedom. One of
our goals is to permit parents to make sound decisions
about vaccination for their children. There are too
many sound health reasons for certain children to avoid
vaccination and the government has recognized too many
vaccine caused deaths and maimings (over $1.5 billion
of compensation has been paid to bereaved families by
the federal vaccine injury compensation system since
1988) to allow a non-vaccinated child to be refused day
care, school, college, or employment," says Dr.
Koren.
Mr. Turner is also lead counsel in a case brought
against Barrett by Dr. Don Harrison, the chiropractor
who founded and leads Chiropractic Biophysics.
|
| 77 |
Funding for research on parasites
Dundee University has received £1.5m to carry out
research into parasites that cause some of the
developing world's most serious diseases.
Illnesses such as African sleeping sickness and Chagas'
disease kill tens of thousands of people every year.
Scientists have received a grant from the Wellcome
Trust to study the biology of the parasites' defence
mechanisms, using special 3-D X-ray images.
The information will then be used to develop new
treatments.
The grant will provide funding for five new staff and
essential equipment.
SLEEPING SICKNESS
Sleeping sickness is endemic in sub-Saharan Africa
It is passed on by the tsetse fly
It is fatal if left untreated
The trust has previously awarded Dundee University's
School of Life Sciences £8.1m to develop new drugs to
fight tropical diseases.
This latest research team, led by Professor Bill
Hunter, will focus on how to stop the parasites.
He said: "We need to develop new knowledge about
the parasites which cause diseases such as African
sleeping sickness, diseases for which the current
treatments are inadequate.
CHAGAS' DISEASE
Chagas' disease is spread by bites from beetle-like
bugs
Many patients do not realise they have been infected
Drugs are toxic and only cure some patients in the
early stages of infection
"We also need to improve our understanding of
parasite biology - how they work, how they stay alive,
what makes them tick essentially.
"That leads to the second stage of the research,
which is how do we stop them working and how we can
develop the chemical tools which will do just
that."
The scientists want to find out how enzymes in the
parasites protect them in the human immune system.
The team will build a detailed picture of the chemical
structure by shining X-rays through crystals made from
the enzymes.
That information will also be used to try and develop
new drugs for malaria and tuberculosis.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/6949344.stm
Published: 2007/08/16 14:22:11 GMT
© BBC MMVII
|
| 78 |
Black Walnut Herb Anti-fungal Parasite Cleanse
Black Walnut is both an anti-fungal and anti-parasite
herb and acts as a laxative which expells worms and
parasites from the body.
Black walnut trees can grow up to 100 feet tall and
they bear delicious, oily nuts that make for superb
chocolate chip cookies. Black walnut wood is prized by
furniture and cabinet makers.
Black Walnut oxygenates the blood which helps to kill
parasites. Black Walnut aids in expelling tapeworms,
pinworms and ringworm. It has also been shown to be
specific for treatment of Candida Albicans. Black
Walnut has been highly thought of as a dependable
remedy for "bad blood" diseases such as
scrofulous, syphilis and diptheria.
It is antiseptic, therefore it is useful in healing and
is useful in all sorts of cleansing programs,
especially in expelling parasites. It is also helpful
with skin problems such as herpes and eczema. It is a
great parasite cleanse.
Black Walnut may also be used to deworm your pets. Open
a capsule and mix the powder with the dog or cat food.
Ingredients: Black Walnut hull powder.
|
| 79 |
Metabolic syndrome
Dr Trisha Macnair
For centuries, doctors have recognised the dangers of
conditions such as diabetes, high blood pressure and
obesity, but only recently have they realised there's a
strong link between them.
In this article
What is it? What are the symptoms?
What causes it? How can I prevent it?
Advice and support
What is it?
Many people who have either diabetes, high blood
pressure or obesity also have one or more of the other
conditions, although it may have gone unrecognised.
Individually, each of these conditions can lead to
damage to the blood vessels, but together they're far
more likely to do harm. People with these conditions in
combination become much more likely to experience heart
disease, stroke and other conditions related to
problems with the blood vessels.
When a person has such a combination, they're said to
have metabolic syndrome. This is also sometimes called
insulin resistance syndrome (because one of the
features is a very high level of the hormone insulin in
the blood, which the body doesn’t react to or is
'resistant' to) or syndrome X.
Metabolic syndrome is very common and becoming more so.
In the United States, surveys estimate that as many as
one in four adults has metabolic syndrome and UK
research suggests a similar number of people are
affected here. It's more common in certain ethnic
groups (such as Asian and Afro-Caribbean people) and
among women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
What are the symptoms?
The problems found in metabolic syndrome include:
Central obesity, when fat is laid down around the
abdomen, rather than spread evenly around the body
Abnormal fat levels in the blood - specifically, high
levels of triglycerides and low levels of HDL (or
'good') cholesterol, which can lead to arteriosclerosis
(fatty plaques) on the walls of blood vessels
High blood pressure - 130/85 mmHg or above
Insulin resistance or glucose intolerance - an
inability to use insulin properly or control blood
sugar levels very well, which is a very important
factor in metabolic syndrome
A prothrombotic state - an increased tendency to make
tiny clots in the blood
A proinflammatory state - an increased tendency to
inflammation
What causes it?
Metabolic syndrome is very complex and doctors have yet
to work out exactly what goes on in the body at the
level of the cells and molecules. However, there seem
to be three contributory factors: an inherited genetic
tendency, being overweight and physical inactivity.
It seems some people are born with a genetic tendency
to develop insulin resistance. If they put on a lot of
weight and don’t do enough exercise, they become
insulin resistant and develop the metabolic syndrome.
How can I prevent it?
Although much more research has to be done to work out
the relationship between different factors in metabolic
syndrome, and how drug treatments might be used to help
people, there are steps you can take to reduce your
risk.
Lifestyle changes can make a big difference, preventing
or delaying the development of serious disease. Losing
weight and getting active are the top priority. But
make sure you get proper advice and support - research
has shown that people who join a weight-loss group, for
example, are more likely to lose weight and keep it
off.
In terms of getting fit, join a gym or find a sport you
enjoy. You're more likely to stick at it if you like
what you're doing.
Some preventative treatments are also available from
your GP. It's important to keep your blood pressure
under control, for example. However, some blood
pressure treatments, such as diuretics and beta
blockers, can actually make metabolic syndrome worse.
Check with your doctor if you're concerned. Drugs to
control blood fat and cholesterol levels, and blood
glucose levels, are often needed, too.
Advice and support
British Heart Foundation
Information line: 0845 070 8070
Website: (External) www.bhf.org.uk
Diabetes UK
Helpline: 0845 120 2960
Website: (External) www.diabetes.org.uk
This article was last medically reviewed by Dr Rob
Hicks in January 2007.
|
| 80 |
Study: High Fructose Corn Syrup Used in Soda Linked
to Diabetes
Tuesday , August 28, 2007
Researchers have found new evidence that soft drinks
sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) may
contribute to the development of diabetes, particularly
in children.
In a laboratory study of commonly consumed carbonated
beverages, the scientists found that drinks containing
the syrup had high levels of reactive compounds that
have been shown by others to have the potential to
trigger cell and tissue damage that could cause the
disease, which is at epidemic levels.
The findings were reported last week at the 234th
national meeting of the American Chemical Society.
HFCS is a sweetener found in many foods and beverages,
including non-diet soda, baked goods, and condiments.
It is has become the sweetener of choice for many food
manufacturers because it is cheaper, sweeter and more
easy to blend into beverages than table sugar.
Some researchers have suggested that high-fructose corn
syrup may contribute to an increased risk of diabetes
as well as obesity, a claim which the food industry
disputes.
In the current study, Chi-Tang Ho, Ph.D., conducted
chemical tests among 11 different carbonated soft
drinks containing HFCS. He found "astonishingly
high" levels of reactive carbonyls in those
beverages.
Carbonyls are undesirable and highly-reactive compounds
associated with “unbound” fructose and glucose
molecules are believed to cause tissue damage, said Ho,
a professor of food science at Rutgers University in
New Jersey.
By contrast, reactive carbonyls are not present in
table sugar, whose fructose and glucose components are
“bound” and chemically stable, the researcher
noted.
Reactive carbonyls also are elevated in the blood of
individuals with diabetes and linked to the
complications of that disease. Based on the study data,
Ho estimates that a single can of soda contains about
five times the concentration of reactive carbonyls than
the concentration found in the blood of an adult person
with diabetes.
Ho and his associates also found that adding tea
components to drinks containing HFCS may help lower the
levels of reactive carbonyls.
The scientists found that adding epigallocatechin
gallate (EGCG), a compound in tea, significantly
reduced the levels of reactive carbonyl species when
added to the carbonated soft drinks studied. In some
cases, the levels of reactive carbonyls were reduced by
half, the researchers say.
“People consume too much high-fructose corn syrup in
this country,” said Ho, in a news release. “It’s
in way too many food and drink products and there’s
growing evidence that it’s bad for you.”
The tea-derived supplement provides a promising way to
counter its potentially toxic effects, especially in
children who consume a lot of carbonated beverages, he
said.
Although eliminating or reducing consumption of HFCS is
preferable, the researchers are currently exploring the
chemical mechanisms by which tea appears to neutralize
the reactivity of the syrup.
|
| 81 |
Morgellons Disease - new epidemic
IMPORTANT information about a new American Epidemic
called Morgellons Disease - It's a parasite infection
that causes "fibers" to come out of skin
lesions - the fibers themselves are alive - MANY people
with Morgellons are being told that it is "all in
their heads". This has gotten quite a bit of
national press lately and we have been flooded with
questions and concerns. Here is an informative report:
The Following Six Signs or Symptoms Are The Basis of
Morgellons Disease 1. Skin lesions, both spontaneously
appearing and self-generated, with intense itching. The
former may initially appear as “urticarial-like”,
or as “pimple-like” with or without a white center.
The latter appear as linear or “picking”
excoriations. Even when not self-generated, lesions
often progress to open wounds that heal abnormally and
usually incompletely. (e.g., heal very slowly with
discolored epidermis or seal over with a thick
gelatinous outer layer.) 2. Crawling sensations, both
within and on the skin surface. Often conceptualized by
the patient as “bugs moving, stinging or biting”
intermittently. Besides the general dermis, may also
involve the scalp, nares, ear canal, and body hair or
hair follicles. The sensations are at times related to
the presence of easily seen insects, arthropods, and
other human and non-human associated parasites that
require serious attention from the observing clinician.
3. Fatigue significant enough to interfere with the
activities for daily living. 4. Cognitive difficulties,
including measurable short term memory and attention
deficit, as well as difficulty processing thoughts
correctly. Described by patients as "brain
fog". 5. Behavioral effects are common in many
patients. Many have been or will be diagnosed as
Attention Deficit Disorder, Attention Deficit
Hyperactivity Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, or
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. A minority do not show
this pattern. Almost all, if previously seen by
well-read physicians without prolonged observation,
will have been labeled as “Delusional Parasitosis”.
Temporal relationship to skin lesion onset is not
known. 6.“Fibers” are reported in and on skin
lesions. They are generally described by patients as
white, but clinicians also report seeing blue, green,
red, and black fibers, that fluoresce when viewed under
ultraviolet light (Wood's lamp).
Objects described as “granules”, similar in size
and shape to sand grains, can occasionally be removed
from either broken or intact skin by physicians, but
are commonly reported by patients. Patients report
seeing black “specks” or “dots” on or in their
skin, as well as unusual 1-3 mm “fuzzballs” both in
their lesions and on (or falling from) intact skin.
OTHER COMMONLY REPORTED SYMPTOMS AND SIGNS 1. Change in
visual acuity. 2. Numerous neurological findings. A
variety of neurological symptoms have been reported.
Some patients have been diagnosed with Amyotrophic
Lateral Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, and other
well-known and recognized disorders, while others
display significant symptoms not falling into any
well-defined neurological category. 3. Gastrointestinal
symptoms, which may include dyspepsia, gastroesophageal
reflux, and/or changes in bowel habits often similar to
Irritable Bowel Syndrome. 4. Neuropsychiatric symptoms
and signs, ranging from mood or personality changes to
diagnosed disorders including Attention Deficit
Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive
Disorder and occasionally frank psychosis. Temporal
relationship to skin lesion onset is not known 5. Acute
changes in skin texture and pigment. The skin is
variously thickened and thinned, with an irregular
texture and irregular hyperpigmentation pattern. The
changes resemble age associated sun-exposure skin
damage, but typically appear acutely 6. Skin
examination often reveals excoriated and/or crusted
lesions which, on examination with lighted
magnification, are seen to have inclusions of variously
colored (white, blue, black, or red) fibers. Skin
examination may also reveal multiple hyper-pigmented
macules, and an increase of what appears to be villous
hair on arms and face. 7. Arthralgias are reported by
many patients. 8. Associated diagnoses which have been
commonly reported in this patient population include
Borreliosis (better known as Lyme Disease),
Fibromyalgia, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
OTHER COMMONLY REPORTED OBSERVATIONS 1. Most patients
will have sought care from multiple medical care
providers. A large number will have been diagnosed with
Delusional Parasitosis likely because of the
juxtaposition of unexplained skin lesions and
sensations and psychiatric overlay. Unfortunately,
almost none will have received an appropriate
diagnostic physical examination (particularly a
microscopic or biopsy examination of lesions), but will
have been diagnosed by history alone with grossly
incomplete observation. 2. Most of these patients feel
abandoned by the traditional medical care system and
have sought alternative care providers or have self
medicated, seriously compounding an already difficult
medical situation
LABORATORY AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION To date,
there have been no formal laboratory or imaging studies
done in this patient group. There are some reasonably
consistent clinical findings, however, that need
further examination, in controlled studies, to be
corroborated or refuted.
|
| 82 |
Hormone linked to autistic traits
By Rebecca Morelle
Science reporter, BBC News, York
|
High levels of a male sex hormone in foetuses are
linked to a higher chance of developing autistic traits
in childhood, scientists say.
The findings come from an eight-year study relating
the development of 253 children to levels of
testosterone they were exposed to in the womb.
The scientists said it was unclear whether the
hormone was causing the traits or was a by-product of
them.
The research was presented at the BA Festival of
Science in York.
The research team, from the University of
Cambridge, looked at levels of foetal testosterone in
the womb by examining samples taken from women
undergoing amniocentesis for clinical reasons.
The children were then followed during their
development.
At 12 months, 18 months and 46 months, the
scientists used tests to spot autism-like traits, such
as counting how often a child looked at its mother's
face or how large its vocabulary was.
At these early stages, the team found a link
between the traits and higher foetal testosterone
levels.
But the scientists' latest research results came
from a study undertaken when the children were eight
years old.
|
This is the first time autistic traits have
been linked to levels of foetal testosterone
Simon Baron-Cohen
|
The children's mothers filled in a questionnaire
called the autism spectrum quotient. This is designed
to test the number of autistic traits a child has by
examining factors such as social interest and pattern
recognition.
Typical questions included whether the child
preferred social activities like parties or spending
time alone, or whether he or she was quick at picking
up numerical patterns, like remembering number plates
or phone numbers.
The results were then compared with the pre-natal
testosterone levels, which had a 20-fold variation,
between 0.1 to 2.05 nanomoles per litre.
Bonnie Auyeng, who carried out the study, said:
"The correlation is not perfect, but foetal
testosterone will account for about 20% of the
variability in [questionnaire] scores. Although this
doesn't sound like a very high number, it is
statistically significant."
Extreme male brain
Professor Simon Baren-Cohen, who was also involved
in the study, said: "This is the first time
autistic traits have been linked to levels of foetal
testosterone, measured in the womb using
amniocenteses."
Animal research has previously linked brain
development to foetal testosterone levels, and some
believe the hormone may play a causal role in autism.
However, the scientists stressed that the study
only showed a link between autistic traits and the
hormone, rather than a direct link to autism itself.
Dr Auyeng said: "We're still in the early
stages of figuring out what actual role foetal
testosterone plays. We don't know if it is causing
autistic traits, if it is a by-product of them, or an
indication of various interactions.
"We are just not sure yet."
Scientists currently do not know what causes
elevated levels of foetal testosterone. Professor
Baron-Cohen said previous research suggested that it
could be a mixture of genetic and environmental
factors.
He said that the hormone could be affecting the
brain through altering neural cell connectivity and
chemicals that carry messages, known as
neurotransmitters.
The team is now planning to follow up its study to
test direct links between autism and testosterone
levels in foetuses. The group will use Denmark's
archive of 90,000 amniocentesis samples and its
register of psychiatric diagnoses.
The work is connected to Professor Baron-Cohen's
hypothesis suggesting that autism is a version of the
extreme male brain.
He said that although researchers had tested this
theory at the psychological level, the new studies
meant it could now be tested at the biological level.
|
| 83 |
Autism symptoms reversed in lab
Symptoms of mental retardation and autism have been
reversed for the first time in laboratory mice.
US scientists created mice that showed symptoms of
Fragile X Syndrome - a leading cause of mental
retardation and autism in humans.
They then reversed symptoms of the condition by
inhibiting the action of an enzyme in the brain.
The study, by Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
appears in Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences.
|
This implies that future treatment may
still be effective even after symptoms are
already pronounced
Dr Susumu Tonegawa
|
Fragile X Syndrome is linked to mutation in a gene
carried on the X chromosome called FMR1.
It can cause symptoms ranging from mild learning
disabilities to severe autism.
The researchers, based at MIT's Picower Institute
for Learning and Memory, targeted an enzyme called PAK
which affects the number, size and shape of connection
between brain cells.
They found that inhibiting the enzyme stopped mice
with Fragile X Syndrome behaving in erratic ways.
Prior to treatment they showed signs of
hyperactivity, purposeless and repetitive movements.
Abnormalities corrected
Further analysis showed that not only were
structural abnormalities in connections between brain
cells righted, proper electrical communication was
restored between the cells.
In the brain small protrusions called dendritic
spines are responsible for communication between
cells.
People with Fragile X Syndrome have more dendritic
spines than usual, but each is longer and thinner, and
transmits weaker electric signals.
Blocking PAK activity in the lab mice corrected
these abnormalities.
Researcher Dr Susumu Tonegawa stressed that the
mice were not treated until a few weeks after symptoms
of disease first appeared.
"This implies that future treatment may still
be effective even after symptoms are already
pronounced," he said.
Professor Eric Klann, of New York University's
Center for Neural Science, agreed that the research
was potentially significant.
He said: "This is very exciting because it
suggests that PAK inhibitors could be used for
therapeutic purposes to reverse already established
mental impairments in fragile X children."
|
| 84 |
Does vitamin C cure cancer or not?
Here's the final answer...
Vitamin C has been labeled as a cure for just about
every disease we know. Some of those claims are true;
some are not. So when I say that vitamin C can cure
cancer, am I just adding to the hoopla? Didn't
scientists prove it doesn't work? Well, here's the real
story.
You already know about Linus Pauling. He is the pioneer
who put vitamin C on the map and was also a two-time
Nobel laureate. That alone should have given him
awesome credibility. But since he was a chemist and not
a physician, mainstream medicine scoffed at him. He
proposed a simple hypothesis: Enough vitamin C should
kill cancer cells.
Researchers studied his proposition. But there were
some severe flaws in their studies - flaws that seemed
deliberate. I'll tell you how in a moment. The failed
studies kicked back the vitamin C and cancer story by
two decades.
It now appears that Pauling was right. A Canadian
journal told the story of three patients with advanced
cancer. One was a 49-year-old man with terminal bladder
cancer. He refused poisons (chemotherapy). Instead, he
got vitamin C in 1996. Not only did it cure his cancer,
but he was still cancer free nine years later.
Another patient, a 66-year-old woman, had an aggressive
lymphoma with a "dismal prognosis" in 1995.
She was similarly treated and still alive 10 years
later.
Then there's a 51-year-old woman with kidney cancer
that spread to her lungs. She was diagnosed in 1995.
She had a normal chest X-ray two years later.
Pathologist confirmed the findings.
Why did the earlier studies fail to prove Pauling's
hypothesis? That research used oral vitamin C rather
than the IV route these patients received. Alternative
physicians deplored the poorly designed research. We
knew that oral doses can never come close to the blood
levels provided by IV - the levels needed to kill
cancer.
Now we're finally seeing studies from the National
Institutes of Health that prove these results. In one
study, Dr. Mark Levine showed that only IV vitamin C
can achieve the high levels necessary to kill cancer.
You see, your kidney will get rid of vitamin C as fast
as your gut can absorb it. But given intravenously, the
IV can far exceed your kidney's ability to eliminate
it. So for a protracted time, you can get super high
blood levels.
Dr. Levine has brilliantly shown that vitamin C is
metabolized to hydrogen peroxide (our old friend) in
the immediate vicinity of cancer cells. Peroxide is
totally permeable to the cell membrane. It will quickly
enter any cell. But cancer cells are vulnerable to
peroxide, while normal cells are rather invulnerable.
Artemisinin, which I reported on several years ago,
also has a peroxide connection. It carries a peroxide
and is selectively toxic to cancer cells. By IV route
(only), vitamin C can reach levels of peroxide lethal
to malignant cells long enough to kill them.
I recently got an update from my friend Chuck Mary, MD
of New Orleans. He has been using absolutely massive
doses of vitamin C - up to 300 grams per day. That's
300,000 mg! He's got a long string of apparent
remissions from some highly advanced cancers. I am very
impressed.
Vitamin C is not a particularly expensive therapy. It
does involve intravenous infusions. If you have cancer,
talk to your integrative physician about vitamin C
therapy. And even if you do choose to do chemo, IV
vitamin C can dramatically reduce the toxicity while
helping the desirable effects of the chemo.
Yours for better health and medical freedom,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
Ref. Canadian Medical Association Journal March
28, 2006.
|
| 85 |
How to double niacin's ability to treat
high cholesterol
I've used niacin in my clinic for years to help my
patients treat their high cholesterol. It's a fantastic
nutrient that actually increases your HDL. The higher
your HDL, the better your body deals with LDL (bad)
cholesterol.
As good as niacin is, I've found that sometimes it
doesn't increase good cholesterol enough. But many
years ago, I found a way to greatly increase the
effectiveness of niacin.
And now, a study has confirmed what my patients and
subscribers have known for years. The breakthrough
study came from the Giovanni Lorenzini Medical
Foundation. The Foundation sponsored two studies on
niacin and fish oil. Neither study received any
commercial support.
The first study evaluated 14 patients with high
triglycerides, low HDL, and normal LDL levels. Seven
received 1 gm of immediate release niacin three times
daily plus 3.4 gm of omega-3 fish oil. The other seven
received a placebo.
After only seven weeks, the treated patients had
fantastic results. Their triglycerides dropped an
average of 52% and their HDL raised 33%. The placebo
patients had an average rise in triglycerides of 10%
and HDL rose by only 4%.
The results astonished one of the researchers, William
Harris, PhD (professor of medicine at the University of
Missouri-Kansas City). He said that the addition of
fish oil almost doubled the previously published
effectiveness of niacin.
A small second study performed in seven type-2
diabetics confirmed Dr. Harris's conclusion. Serum
triglycerides fell a whopping 52% from 238 to 114 mg/dL
after 16 weeks of treatment. HDL rose from 40 to 63
mg/dL, a whopping 58% increase in this "good"
cholesterol. The placebo did nothing. The combination
had no effect on LDL cholesterol or hemoglobin A1c. The
latter is a measure of long-term blood sugar levels.
Researchers used the same seven patients as their own
controls. When switched back to placebo, their numbers
returned to baseline.
Folks, what more could you ask for? This is a fantastic
and inexpensive way to boost your body's ability to
handle cholesterol, with no side effects. It's great to
see this treatment gaining acceptance, even in the
mainstream. If you're taking niacin to treat your
cholesterol, make sure you add fish oil to your
treatment as well. You'll be amazed at the added
benefit.
Yours for better health and medical freedom,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
Ref: Family Practice News, September 15, 2005.
|
|